Gottwald vs. Sebert was a court case that has to deal with the breaking of a contract. The defendant, Kesha Rose Sebert, is a songwriter as well as a recording artist. The plaintiff, Lukasz Sebastian Gottwald, is a music producer who was suing Sebert and her mother for breach of contract and defamation. The initial contract, which began in 2005, between Sebert and Gottwald stated that Sebert had to provide six albums for Kemosabe/Kasz Money, Inc., a music label. Sebert’s mother, however, felt that the two of them were not being paid fairly.
PAGE 1 Oswald Lewis Professor Monford Audio Distribution 20 September 2016 Bob Lifton and Regent sound studio The recording industry during early 1970 was a smaller community than what it is today, during this time many individual were working from personal studios. There was few manufacturer of audio equipment, not too much information to read on and not many people knew about this equipment something that a lot of engineers were doing during this time was modifying equipment or building their own equipment out the machine that were design to do a completely different function and if you were a successful studio they were very secretive about the key to success. Robert Lifton better knowed as Bob Lifton was a sound engineer from New York during 1959,
As a result of copyright laws, artist can cover a song as long as they pay a composer similar to radio stations playing a song; they also pay the composer a fee. A surprising comparison is made by cable companies
Thomas-Rasset took the case to Supreme Court. Joel Tenenbaum had an RIAA lawsuit filed against him while he was a student at Boston University. He downloaded thirty songs between 1999 and 2007. Like Thomas-Rasset, Tenenbaum decided to fight against the lawsuit in Supreme Court. 2.
Negativland’s point is that artists do not have much creative freedom because the copyright law allows artists to profit off lawsuits. Artists will feel more inclined to create new music because they will not have to worry about being
Avec Audio Grant Questions Note: Please highlight any edits you have made! ☺ 1.) Tell us about your business and what makes it unique. Please provide a general description of your product, customers, competitive landscape, and overall performance. Avec Audio is uniquely positioned to be a global leader in advanced virtual recording technology in 5-10 years, by producing professional instrumental performances for a fraction of the cost of traditional recording techniques. Professional performers have prerecorded every note and technique of all instruments and compiled these recordings into libraries of data that are used to render recordings of music.
Sometimes, because of their actions against their record labels the musicians got their way other times they were forced to find new record labels to start hopefully a brighter future. Tom Petty was one of those unfortunate musicians who got into a dispute with their record label. In Tom Petty's case the dispute was over the amount of money he was getting. How the record labels worked was that they would give them royalties, earnings for their music. These royalties however could not be earned until all cost for creating the music were recovered.
In the article entitled “A Royal Revolution: An Analysis of the Influence of Prince on Music Marketing” by Deirde T. Guion Peoples, record labels paid all the costs for an artist’s album—production, distribution, marketing. But in return, they owned the recordings thanks to the ‘work for hire’ copyright law. Gaining ownership through contracts was standard, but lots of musicians hated giving up their song rights. This incisive point illuminates the fact that artists put in the effort to share their creativity with their audiences, but they had no control over their
After a song has been written, released, and enjoyed by the masses, songwriters receive compensation for their work through their Performing Rights Organizations (“PROs”). PROs negotiate license agreements for the use of songs, collect any royalties the songs generate, and distribute those royalties back to the songwriters. Today there are three major PROs: the American Society of Composers and Music Publishers (“ASCAP”), Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) and SESAC, Inc. (“SESAC”). Currently, ASCAP, BMI and SESAC license practically every copyrighted musical work in the United States. In 1941, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) began investigating ASCAP and BMI for allegedly monopolizing “…the market for performance rights for copyrighted songs played on the radio.”
Because of this lawsuit against Ozzy, other musicians were fearing for their creative
Darrius Johnson, a author, says that well established artists can lose much from corporate deals. He supports this claim by talking about U2, a band that received large amounts of criticism and hate from fans about how they were forced to except music that they did not want to listen to. Even though this is a example of a corporate deal gone wrong, this is extremely rare and the benefits far outweigh the cons. Johnson also says in the same article, that artists need to make money in order to keep making music. If artists do not accept corporate deals, consequently, they will not be able to make
For example, in the above section there was a brief explanation given about the band the Verve in regards to them loosing all their rights to the Rolling Stones manager. This example is given because it is a prime example of how copyright can be a double-edged-sword used to make money as opposed to protecting. The Verve in 1997 produced a major hit that went number one worldwide called “Bitter Sweet Symphony”. The band sampled a five-note sample from an orchestrated version of The Rolling Stones song “The Last Time”.
Record labels avoid speaking about it and also artists to not raise attention to the problem. Thankfully this topic is starting to be brought up in conversations around the music world. More and more fans on the daily seem to be becoming outraged at this situation. As more and more producers start to speak up about their personal experiences , the more people it's getting too. ‘‘I've seen it happen often over the last few years.
People that make movies and music make money and have good lives. They always find reasons to sue people a large amount of money for downloading movies, songs etc. They want every last dime of their money and they could really live without it. There is a law saying that you have up to 5 years in prison, and you have to pay a 150,000 dollar fee per file of illegal downloaded material! That is kind of crazy.
Working in the music industry I have learned a few vital pieces of information. 1. When you go out, always plan on having to listen to an artist go on and on about who did this and who produced what on their latest EP.. If you are really lucky, you will get a demo cd to take home. There is no shame in name dropping for most here in Nashville.
