Bandura's Theory Of Self Efficacy Theory

1035 Words5 Pages

Folkman’s (1984) where Lazarus himself stated that “The interpretation of stressful events is more important than the events themselves. The model itself is under the transactional based models where focuses on the approach of the person to the environmental demands. Both of them had given the definition of stress as the product of the transaction between the person and the environment that is needed to be evaluated or “appraised” by the individual. The arising of stress from the appraisal that is being demanded by the environment can result to implicit and explicit kinds of threat to the resources or directly to the state-of-being of the individual (Holroyd and Lazarus 1982). In this so called “Environmental transaction” the individual gathers …show more content…

From the given context, self-efficacy refers to an individuals convictions about his/her skills and abilities and also from Bandura’s definition he referred to it “as a people’s belief about their capabilities to produce levels of performance that exercise influence over events that affect their lives or high assurance in their capabilities”. In this theory, summarizing that will only pursue things that they think or believe that are in their capable of doing and accomplishing and vice versa for the things they think they are going to fail. In addition, people with a strong sense of efficacy strongly believes that they can accomplish even the most difficult task; this way of point viewing, they are seeing it as a challenging goal to be mastered than threats to be …show more content…

It simply states that watching someone like you succeed will increase the attempt of self-efficacy and if someone like you fail under your observation will surely threatens your self-efficacy.
VERBUAL PERSUASION
It is the third factor that affects the self-efficacy. When an individual that is undergoing to a task and has been verbally persuaded they’ve got the higher chance for achieving or mastering the task and more likely to accomplish the given task. Giving the individual a strong trust among himself/herself in the long way.
SOMATIC AND EMOTIONAL STATES
Stress, anxiety, worry, fear, and all negativity will surely affect self-efficacy and will lead to failure or the inability to performed the task that is imposed by fear (Pajares, 2002). Both physical and emotional aspects can create some pathways to success and failure. If the emotional state improves – that is, emotional arousal or stress is reduced- a change in self-efficacy can b expected (Bandura & Adams,