ipl-logo

Board Of Regents Of Sonnet V Southworth Case Summary

607 Words3 Pages

Case: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000). Facts: The parties to this lawsuit include the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (Petitioner), and Scott Harold Southworth, a student at the University of Wisconsin (Respondent). In this particular case, the dispute revolves around an “activity fee” imposed on the students by the University, which the students are required to pay. This fee is partially used to support registered student organizations, some of which participate in political and/or ideological speech. Southworth and two other students originally sued the University in Federal Court, where they challenged the constitutionality of the mandatory “activity fee,” namely how the funds were allocated. The US District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Southworth and his classmates. The University then attempted to appeal this decision in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals upheld the District Court’s judgment and refused …show more content…

Holding: No, the Court unanimously held for judgment IN FAVOR of the University, concluding that the University was NOT in violation of the First Amendment rights of certain students by imposing such a compulsory “activity fee” on all students, the funds of which are partially used by the University to support registered student organizations that are at odds with the viewpoints and beliefs of certain other students. 6/9 Justices provided the Court’s holding and majority opinion — Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Rehnquist, O’Conner, Scalia, Thomas and Ginsburg, delivered the Court’s unanimous judgement and the Court’s majority

Show More
Related

Hernandez V. Arizona Board Of Regents Case Brief

1228 Words | 5 Pages

Leonel Torres (Group #1) BUS3 80 09/08/14 Case Brief Case Name: Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents, 172 Ariz. 244; 866 P.2d 1330; 1994Ariz. LEXIS 6 Arizona Supreme Court, 1994. Facts: A fraternity from the University of Arizona gained new members to their organization, on August 27, 1988. The fraternity was accustomed to serving alcoholic beverages to those members who help fund the drinks.

Read More

Jacob Winkleman Case Summary

806 Words | 4 Pages

The Winkelmans’ were seeking reversal of the decision and reimbursement for the private school expense, attorney fees and declaratory

Read More

Mclaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents Case Study

242 Words | 1 Pages

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Supreme Court ruled that the medical

Read More

Bakke V. California Davis Medical School Case Study

601 Words | 3 Pages

Allan Bakke was a more qualified applicant compared to some of the other students admitted under the special admissions policy. Comparatively his is race was the only distinguishing characteristic. Allen Bakke sued University of California, Davis Medical School, alleging the special admissions program denied him equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. ISSUE IN QUESTION The issue in question, is The University of California Davis Medical School’s admissions policy constitutional?

Read More

Case Brief Griswold V. Connecticut

624 Words | 3 Pages

The fee was to support the campus’ extracurricular activities and other campus services. The fee was also used to fund a number of organizations within the university including; Registered Student Organization (RSO), International Socialist Organization, College Democrats and Republicans among others. In April, 1996, Scott Harold Southworth and two other law students the university’s Madison campus sued the university’s student fee system. They claimed that the students were being forced to go against their will as far as the right of free association, rights of free speech and the rights under the First Amendment are concerned.

Read More

How Did Dwight Lopez Argued To The Supreme Court

337 Words | 2 Pages

The ten students were suspended at Central High School in Columbus, Ohio. The principal was the first to hear about this and decided to suspend them without reason. The parents of the students were outraged for not getting an explanation. Furthermore, the Ohio law entitled the school principal

Read More

Hendrick Hudson Central School District V. Rowley Case

1076 Words | 5 Pages

The school district was still not happy with the decision so they appealed their case to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said that in the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, a free appropriate public education consists of educational instruction that is planned to meet the unique needs of the child that has a disability, supported by such services as are necessary to permit the child "to benefit" from the instruction. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Amy Rowley (458 U. S. 176). Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/caselaw/ussupct.rowley.htm Free Appropriate Public Education does not require the

Read More

Lau V Nichols Case Summary

665 Words | 3 Pages

The Ninth Court also stated no constitutional nor statutory mandate existed requiring the SFUSD to provide remedial programs to students that met the qualification of being disadvantaged. However, the Supreme Court eventually stepped in. Because of the public importance of the issue in Lau v. Nichols, the Supreme Court granted certiorari. This meant the lower courts had to send all information involving the case to the Supreme Court. Then, the Supreme Court took over the case.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Mills Vs Board Of Education District Of Columbia

752 Words | 4 Pages

The court approved the administrative law judges decision and granted a summary judgment against the school

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Abigail Fisher V. University Of Texas

776 Words | 4 Pages

District Court judge, Sam Sparks, who upheld the university’s use of race when deciding admissions under the precedent of Grutter v. Bollinger because the university’s use of race was found to be narrowly tailored. When the decision was challenged, the case was heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and the district court’s ruling was affirmed. When Fisher challenged the decision, the case was heard by the Robert’s U.S. Supreme Court which decided that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had erred by not applying the test of strict scrutiny to the University of Texas at Austin’s decision to base some of their admissions on race, and so the case went back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. When the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard the case again, they decided that the university’s admission policy based somewhat on race was narrowly tailored to the objective of promoting educational diversity. Currently, the case Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is pending a decision by the U.S. Supreme

Read More

Supreme Court Case Study: Fisher V. Texas

858 Words | 4 Pages

According to "Fisher v. University of Texas" the majority decision was made based off: Previous precedent had established that educational diversity is a compelling interest as long as it is expressed as a concrete and precise goal that is neither a quota of minority students nor an amorphous idea of diversity. In this case, the Court determined that the University of Texas sufficiently expressed a series of concrete goals along with a reasoned explanation for its decision to pursue these goals along with a thoughtful consideration

Read More

New Jersey Vs. T. L. O Case Study

963 Words | 4 Pages

The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Earl Versus The Board Of Education

740 Words | 3 Pages

They all simply seem to be arguing against the Drug Testing for the reason that it is just wrong, and unconstitutional. There is no information leading me to assume that the students had previous problems with drugs, and wanted to avoid the test. The parents must have also played a big part, upset with the whole Drug Testing Policy happening with their children at the school. Majority decision of the Court: The Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision voted that the Drug Testing Policy was in fact, constitutional.

Read More

Westside Community Schools Case Study

660 Words | 3 Pages

“The students alleged that Westside 's refusal violated the Equal Access Act, which requires that schools in receipt of federal funds provide "equal access" to student groups seeking to express "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" messages” (Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens by and Through Mergens). Many still argue today that Westside 's prohibition against the Christian club, consistent with the Establishment Clause, makes the Equal Access Act unconstitutional.

Read More

California Vs Bakke

1496 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court case of The Regents of the University of California versus Bakke questioned the use of affirmative action in applications. The medical school of the University of California at Davis reserved sixteen out of one hundred seats of every entering class for minorities (Blacks, Chicanos, Asians, and American Indians) (Banfield pg.82). Allan Bakke a white male in his mid-thirties was twice denied access to the University strictly based on quotas, although Bakke had MCAT scores and GPA higher than other minority applicants admitted (McBride par.3). Bakke would later sue The University of California on the basis that the school had violated the civil rights act of 1964.

Read More

More about Board Of Regents Of Sonnet V Southworth Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document