I found it interesting that NT Wright was clarifying the differences between God’s wrath and penal substitution with reform theologian Thomas Schreiner in this video. I was a little unsure, but this video affirmed my understanding that NT Wright was a unique blend of sweet and sour flavors enhanced by hot and spicy pepper that Thomas Schreiner was hot for him to take in. I agree with NT Wright argument the wrath of God. Why? Because Wright says that the cross was about much more than Jesus absolving us of sin.
Australia, a common law country, uses the adversary system which relies on a two-sided structure of opponent sides each presenting their own position, with an impartial judge or jury hearing each side and determining the truth in the case This system aims to accomplish procedural fairness, while also balancing the right of the individual with the rights and interests of society as a whole. . The burden of proof id placed on the prosecution and must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. This essay will examine the advantages and disadvantages of the adversary system and whether the use of this system achieves just and fair outcomes. Throughout this argument, reference to the R v Gittany 2014 case will be made, emphasising how the adversary system
The absurd cries of young, simpleton girls ignited a series of potentially deadly trials that would soon prove to end fatally for over 20 accused victims. The fact that absurd, superstitious accusations were considered to be sufficient evidence to condemn a victim defines the very contrast of due process.
It seems that for centuries women have been used by men. Some of the world’s most powerful sources, like the Bible, even suggest that women were literally made for men, which makes it no wonder that media advertisements today objectify women. One of the worst offenders of sexualizing and objectifying women is the fast food industry, particularly Carl’s Jr. One of their most ignoble ads is the “Borderball” commercial. It depicts a women’s volleyball game occurring over the Texas-Mexico border because the two teams are settling a disagreement over a burger’s identity: Texan or Mexican.
Herbert is asserting Coca Cola’s rights to the “It’s the Real Thing” slogan by expressing how it has been utilizing that slogan since 1942, in order to to further prove to Seaver that “It’s a Real Thing” forms a significant part of the Coca Cola company since its early beginnings. Herbert states the fact that as a company, they have “...national use of ‘It’s the Real Thing’ in the summer of 1969 and it is our main thrust for 1970.” Herbert is supporting Coca Cola’s entitlement to the slogan and reinforcing to Seaver, in a demanding tone, that because the slogan has been an important factor in their advertising for some time, Grove Press should desist from utilizing the “It’s a Real Thing” slogan for their advertisements. Although Herbert attempts
Foster had to deal with the fact that he was denied due process and the right to impartial jury, because the prosecution challenges to strike black jurors on the discrimination against race. He argues that the prosecutions jury selection’s notes shows intent to remove black jurors from the jury and the prosecution’s unreasonable reason’s for go against the black jurors is unconstitutional in the way of corresponding notes. Chatman argues that the prosecution established sufficient justification for going against each prospective black juror and also that the notes were prepared for the Batson
As a sportswriter, Pennington chooses his words carefully. Through the use of language which is clear, simple and easily understood he makes the article more accessible to a broader audience. The author continues with the quote, “Even in high school cheerleading, there is no uniformity of regulations. . . and little state control” (Pennington). The article offers a tone of concern about the dangers involved in today’s cheerleading programs.
During the late nineteenth century, the role of the government in the economy , money, and corporations in politics have been the subjects of some of the most important and pungent constitutional struggles in American history. Today, economic inequality is at its highest level since the early twentieth century. Concerns continue to grow towards the rising inequality that has become incompatible with a functioning and sustainable democracy. The comparison between today and the Lochner Era of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries continues to arise from many political and legal commenters. The Court has previously protected the political and economic interests of many corporations and wealthy individuals during periods of economic inequality.
The author that is more convincing about their point of view is the point author. The reason that this essay is better is because they used more evidence than the counterpoint author. The writer of the counterpoint uses their own opinion to back up their argument “Millions of Americans see violent imagery in films and on TV every day, but very few commit violent crimes” (2). This is not a valid point to support their argument because they never use any fact based evidence to back up their claim. The counterpoint author does use evidence to support their point of view.
10.1 Reader response is what it means to that person. This view allows the person to ignore, overlook what the other intent was at the time of writing. Therefore, the ability to twist a text to one’s own bias is all but guaranteed to happen. Authorial intent is a application that views the text, story through the lens of the author. This gets to the point of what the author wants to communicate with the reader and not vis-versa.
