ipl-logo

Book Banning Research Paper

524 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Book banning

Book Banning
I think that the root problem with the book banning/burning was the level of maturity in the certain individuals affected. Both of these books were not made for children. I think the people in charge that banned Mr Vonnegurt’s book could have done better with their solution and the people at the Biloxi school came up with an adequate solution to the problem.

An example is the book by Kurt Vonnegut, but they were still taught in the classroom. Then the directors of the school destroy his work of art because it was not kid friendly, even though they were the ones to put it into the school curriculum. I think the school’s solution to the problem was not good. Like what it says in paragraph 3 in I am real where it says, “I want you to know, too, that my publisher and I have done absolutely nothing to exploit the disgusting news from Drake.” Even when the school burned the book he said that he did not exploit them like he mentions in this quote. I think he knew his book was not for children, but what I think he really is mad about is his reputation. Its like someone making an R rated movie for a adults then a kid sneaks in watches it and complains to his parents and the parents slandering the movie …show more content…

What they did was put it in the library instead of teaching it in the curriculum. Yes the book might be appropriate for some children, but for others it might be too intense. So putting it in the library lets you decide whether you are ready for the book, if not don 't read it. Like where it says in paragraph 3 of the article where it says, “It’s still in our library”. The school leader in Biloxi thought that the morals taught from the book “to Kill a Mockingbird” could be replicated in a less offensive form through another book. I think it could, to an extent because history back then was offensive and to not teach people about history means that it is bound to repeat

Show More
Related
260 Words | 2 Pages

Others have decided not to ban it, because of the first amendment. Although banning Fahrenheit 451 would be an infringement on the author's right to speak freely, the long-lasting mental and physical devastation to the children reading this book that arises as a result of

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

One reason this book should not be banned from schools is how it teaches mature students how hard things were during the Great Depression for adults. This is clear towards the beginning of the book when Steinbeck talks about getting work cards. On page five, George expresses how hard things are for them when he asks Lennie to remember things from the past. “You remember about us goin’ into Murray and Ready’s, and they give us work cards?”

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Hello, my name is Zac, and today I will be speaking to you all about why To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools. To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written and published by Harper Lee in 1960. The novel takes place during the three years of the great depression in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama. The novel deals with serious issues of rape and racial inequality. To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools because students such as myself need to exposed to the themes that are in the novel because the novel’s themes have relevance in today’s society.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

This book should be taught to High School students across the country, and it should not be a banned book. To Kill a Mockingbird teaches students morals, and ethics. The book is still partially accurate to what some people go through even in today’s world, and what the books reads is still a part of history that should not be covered up and tucked away. To Kill a Mockingbird should still be taught in school systems, and should not be a banned book because the novel focuses on a part of history that should not be ignored.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

A reason why the novel To Kill a Mockingbird should be banned from the ninth-grade curriculum is that all the acts of violence from the book can be reenacted by the students reading the book. For example the novel states in chapter twenty-two page 290 “Mr.Bob Ewell stopped Atticus on the post office corner, spat in his face, and told him he’d get him if it were took the rest of his life”. If a student reads this then they will think it is ok for them to spit in someone else’s face and threaten them without any consequences.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

The novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee has frequently been banned from schools because of the racial content, tension, slurs. The book does use some words that shouldn't be said in schools for children or teenagers. The book also has some advantages; it tells how people were treated before our time. The blacks were segregated and treated very differently from the whites. I do not think it should be taken out of schools because many teens should learn a lesson out of this book because there are many lessons to be learned while reading.

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.

Read More
1200 Words | 5 Pages

To prove this point, I will be using the book in question, To Kill a Mockingbird, and an article by Pam Louwagie, “After dropping two books with racial slurs, a painful turning of the page in Duluth”. Schools being able to have the right to ban books based on the fact that these books make children of color uncomfortable because of the use of racial slurs is a sound and safe opinion. It brings comfort to anyone who finds the use of racial slurs disgusting. While all this is true, not teaching these controversial books is tiptoeing around the issue of race.

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

With the release of To Kill a Mockingbird 58 years ago, it has sparked some controversies across the USA with it being banned in southern states and even some northern states. Harper Lee, the epitome of a writer who knows how to paint a picture in someone’s mind, wrote a story that describes the struggle of people living in the Great Depression. Even so, many educators are completely ignoring the messages and life lessons that this book gives,”Schools in Duluth, Minnesota, have banned To Kill a Mockingbird and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn over the books’ use of racial slurs,” said by staff in the independent news. As a matter of fact, I believe that To Kill a Mockingbird should be read in U.S classrooms; the reason being that any reader could get something from it and change the readers paradigm.

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

“Using profanity was against school policy and having the book in the library made newly elected school board member, Larry McDonald, feel uncomfortable.”

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

According to the definition of learning, it means “the acquisition of knowledge or skills through experience, study, or by being taught.” The book, To Kill a Mockingbird has been a topic of discussion for most schools, some say it is not suitable for students and shouldn’t be included in their curriculum. This is because of the language and non acceptable depictions of characters. This is because it was written and set in Alabama in the 1930’s during the Jim Crow Era. Though some debate whether or not To Kill a Mockingbird should be allowed to be taught in school or banned from the shelves.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

In some cases books were banned from schools because parents believed there kids should not be opened to certain topic in the stories. Another issue is students have been sent home to read books for certain classes that talk about touchy subjects. For example, religion and magic. Parents

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

Many books have been placed on the banned book list, they have been placed on the list because concerned people fear that certain books have and leave an effect on the reader. America’s classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, has been placed on the banned book list ever since it was first published. To Kill A Mockingbird should absolutely remain on the banned book list because it shows racism throughout the entire book and teaches the reader that being prejudice is alright. As you read the novel To Kill A Mockingbird you notice that it is very racist. Throughout the novel you notice that it repeatedly uses the “n” word.

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from

Read More

More about Book Banning Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document