ipl-logo

Books Should Be Banned Research Paper

658 Words3 Pages

First If you let people have too much freedom will they abuse it to the best they can. Banneedbooksweek.org explains that Books like “Lord of the flies” and “where's Waldo” have been banned for some very stupid things. Where's Waldo was banned for side boob where the book was made to find things hard to find someone spotted the side of a girl's boob and decided to ban it even though most kids will have seen that if they go to the beach ever. Lord of the flies was banned because there was bullying which this book does have a frequency to it, but it can also be used as a show that bullying is wrong. Another book called slaughterhouse was banned for being sexually explicit and having excessive violence. Slaughterhouse (slaughter being mass killing) being the title would make anyone …show more content…

Procon.org explained Banning books is basically taking someone's writing about how they expressed a story they thought up of which is restricting it. People expended their time, resources and effort to make a book and people said that no one should be able to read that book as well as writing is a form of speech which means that it has freedom of speech. Parents should be in control of what their children read not a legal system because the parents are the one in charge of the child and are the one responsible for the child should be the one to say what they can and can't read. There are alternatives to banning books that can protect the freedom of speech and protect the “innocents of kids”. Give an online review for parents whether they believe their child should read it or not, that gives a review and tells why they gave the review. Have a discussion with a teacher on the books that the students will be reading if you believe your child shouldn’t read the book then ask the teacher if your student could have a different assignment. Parents should be the ones in charge of their kids reading not the legal

Show More
Related
631 Words | 3 Pages

“Having the freedom to read and the freedom to choose is one of the best gifts my parents ever gave me,” Judy Blume. The issue is there are both pros and cons upon banning and challenging books. Some people may be all for it and believe their children should not be exposed to realism that comes from books ‘trying to protect them.’ What ever happened to the freedom of speech? Books are constantly challenged or even banned.

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Would you rather read a book of your choice or read a book that has been banned. ”Often challenges are motivated by a desire to protect children from “inappropriate” sexual content or “offensive” language. The following were the top three reasons cited for challenging materials as reported to the Office of Intellectual Freedom: content was considered to be sexually explicit, contained offensive language, and the materials were unsuited to any age group.” Banned books give people a sense of curiosity and excitement, which is why more and more people want to read banned books; to see what the hype was about.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

Summary • Books are challenged to protect other people, but I think if you are a parent you should be the one monitoring what your child reads and protecting them from books that are not appropriate for them. The government should not ban books just because a group of people thinks that it is

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Anyone could be going through this exact thing but by taking away that right and freedom for someone to read something is absolute crap. Anyone can find anything wrong with something or not “healthy” for kids. Untimely it’s up to perception if you have lots of trouble with drug abuse and you read this book you can either say I’m going to smoke every day because Holden does this and blah blah my mom and this and that’s up to you, or you can see how this affected Holden in a negative way and ask for help. The problem is anyone can see negative in anything I could give you a child’s books and there could be references that might be ok for a kid but a four year old is not going to think about sex they are going to see a princess climbing a tower. If we say this book is banned because so and so says this, that is what we will see because when negative is pointed out that’s all one can think about.

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

Book banning is not as common as it is made out to be in the U.S., but it does put a restriction the constitution’s first amendment. To ban a book, in the U.S., from a public or school libraries, for offensive content, a challenge must be made against the book. A challenge can be made by anyone but of the challenges made between “1990 and 2000, there were 6,364 challenges reported... sixty percent were reported by parents, fifteen percent by patrons and nine percent by administrators” (Schools and censorship: Banned Books). Most of these challenges sent to the American Library Association do not get accepted and officially ban the book.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

Banning books is bad because it stops children from learning a bunch of things that they need to know, whether it’s history, how to cope or how to show empathy and learn different perspectives. Books should not be banned, without books we will not learn about history, struggles people go through in everyday life including discrimination. “In America, we don't ban books, we don't ban free thought, we don't silence free speech. The Nazis did that,” Davis said on a website called

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

Banning is never what it seems to be. In the banning of a book can be a person just believes there are things that kids shouldn't read. But they don't understand anything about our world. Banning a book that can help many lives just because of one thing isn't right.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Salman Rushdie once said, “What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.”. The banning of books interferes with certain rights. Children should be allowed to read specific books if given permission. The banning of books also limits the reality of certain individuals.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Conrad, Calvin, and Beth make up the Jarrett family. Beth is the mother, Calvin, the father, and Conrad, their remaining son. Buck, their other son, was killed before the novel took place in a boating accident. The dysfunction begins at the beginning of the novel, which takes place a year or so after Buck is killed. AMPP would have been very useful for the family, especially the mother.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

[21]” (ProCon.org). Banning books in school can create a problem for the teachers that are trying to assign something to the class. With the new addition to the first amendment schools will have the rights to any books. When books are banned the life lessons in the books are also

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

There are both pros and cons to banning book in school. According to ProCon.org, “Parents have the right to decide what material their children are exposed to and when.” Parents have the right to ban books so they can protect their children from violent content. Children need to be protect from content that could scar them. ProCon.org also states that “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics in school or public libraries.”

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from

Read More

More about Books Should Be Banned Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document