On April 19, 1995, at 0902 hours, Oklahoma City was rocked to the core when a bomb was set off outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (History.com Staff, 2009). A total of 168 people were killed, another 850 were injured as the result of the bombing. At the time of the bombing, there were no indications of who was responsible for the disaster. While searching the debris investigators discovered a twisted axle from the vehicle where the bomb had been located. The hidden vehicle identification code led investigators to a rental facility in Junction City, Kansas (Goodman, 2017).
The evidence, from the 7 eyewitnesses, support that the colonists were the aggressors during the fateful evening of March 5, 1770, the Boston Massacre. Some cited evidence proves it. Number one, “I saw the people throw snowballs at the soldiers and saw a stick 3 feet long strike a soldier upon the right” (Theodore Bliss). In other terms they were assaulting the soldiers with pieces of snow or ice at them, afterward they hit one of them with a 3 foot club. This shows that the soldiers didn’t shoot to murder, they shot in self-defense.
“FIRE, FIRE, DAMN YOU, FIRE! I DARE YOU!” yelled the colonists on the street as they threw snowballs, rocks, shells and clubs at the British soldiers. This was the beginning of what was called the Boston Massacre, it occurred on the night of March 5th, 1770. On this night, five men and boys were killed because of the confusion between the soldiers and the colonists.
Edward Buckley here reporting live from Boston where a massacre has just outbroke. British troops were sent in to maintain order of the colonist. The colonist didn't seem to be too happy about that. Large groups of angry colonist came together and began taunting the British soldiers. Along with the taunting, the colonist began throwing snowballs and showing hostile actions towards the British soldiers.
Boston Massacre was an incident that happened in Boston around the Customs House on March 5, 1770, between the Patriots and the Redcoats. It was started by Patriot throwing stuff to insult the Redcoats because they felt the law violated their rights. The Townshend Acts, a law that required the colonists to pay taxes when they buy tea, paper, glass. During the incident, a group of British soldiers killed five American colonists by opened fire. Three were shot to dead directly, others were wounded, and two died after wounded.
On march 5,1770 the boston massacre occur , when british soldiers in boston opened fired on a group of american colonists. Five people were killed in the massacre. The soldiers were told if anything happens they are able to shot fired. This boston massacre started by a mob that were made with the government and the military that they raised the taxes.
Call me a tory or not, but the british in the Boston Massacre were not guilty of murder and opening fire on crowd for no reason. The british completely and utterly acted in self defense on March 5,1770. Know you might say well they placed taxes on us… NEWS FLASH… this is about whether this is murder or done in self defense, not taxes. Trust me this king’s Street mess was definitely in self defense.
Was the Boston Massacre an accident, people say it was, people say it wasn't. Till what I´ve heard the Boston Massacre is not an accident because according to the articles many witnesses were there to experience it such as Benjamin Burdick he had a testimony of the Boston massacre that he said in court. Another guy that was there to witness the horrible traject was Nutent Prince both of them saw what happened. Nutent Prince supports either side because it says in source D that he saw snow balls, clubs, buckets, that the colonist had to defend themselves. Also the testimony of Thomas Preston who was the captain of the british soldiers, said i source B that many of the civilians were yelling saying ¨Come on rascals, your bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare...dam you…
You made a great point on the propaganda used in the etching. In many ways, Paul Revere was trying to invoke emotions in the colonists in order to support his own views of the British. The use of the words favage and murd’rous give a dark tone on the Boston Massacre. The British did in fact kill only 5 people, yet the etching made it seem as if it were thousands. This over exaggeration worked in Revere’s favor as that was his intended goal.
Was the Boston Massacre Really a Massacre? One of the most common things talked about in the history of the U.S.A. is the Boston Massacre, but was this historical event commonly looked at as a massacre really a massacre. I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all instead it was just the act of self defense of a few british soldiers that were being attacked by upset colonists. One of the most said things about the Boston Massacre is that the british soldiers fired into a crowd of innocent people, but there is many pieces of proof that says otherwise.
TITLE "The path of least resistance is the path of the loser" - H.G Wells. One of the most standout and preeminent instances of resistance I have heard about would undoubtedly be the Boston colonist struggles against Britain and the British soldiers. During the late 1700s, the Colonists of Boston endured many hardships and conflicts that they had to show resistance against. Some of those hardships were things such as all of the different acts and laws the British placed upon them, the lack of freedom, and the unfair amount of taxes that they needed to pay the king. These hardships taught me how nothing you want in life comes easy, a quote from the Beastie Boys “You’ve gotta fight for your right” Is the perfect description of the lesson and
The original colonists settled in America to escape oppression based upon their religion or political affiliation. Therefore, from the beginning, Americans were instilled with a desire for freedom and independence. However, when first starting out, the small colonies did need help from the British government to survive.
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
Social Justice as a Core Professional Value Social justice is foundational to counselling psychology. To me, social justice is more complex than ensuring every human is equal. It goes beyond equality to include, equal distribution of privilege, steadfast social inclusion and decreed anti-oppressive practices in counselling. As a core professional value, practicing social justice will eradicate oppression and ensure an egalitarian society.