Soldiers enveloped in red drilled into formation. Muskets loaded and at hand, the men took aim. “BANG! BANG! BANG!” exploded from the British muskets and thundered across the Boston quiet evening. Once the sulfuric cloud of smoke vanished, seven redcoats displayed a despicable smile. According to Boston Massacre Historical Society, three – blood stained – victims laid dead and two other victims were doomed with the same fate. Six other Bostonians were wounded. Many (British resentful) colonists’ minds were infested with this scene, depicted in Paul Revere’s engraving, after the Boston Massacre transpired. Oil was poured upon the flames of revolution as the engraving shows the faces of British soldiers with mischievous content. Little did the colonists know the bitter depiction of the 1770s “Bloody Massacre” blinded them from the truth.
On the evening of March 5, 1770,
…show more content…
Revere segregates the Bostonians and British soldiers on opposing sides to illustrate the oppressed and the oppressor. Viewers constantly dart their eyes between the British and the Bostonians to analyze their contrasting characteristics. Revere excludes all Bostonians’ violence towards the British soldiers to stir up sympathy towards the Bostonians. Observers can see everything clearly to satisfy Revere’s desire of degrading the British reputation. The sharp buildings depict the exact location where the massacre took place. Revere plans to use the detailed illustration of the location to inject patriotism and anger into Boston visitors, who know where three Boston died. He openly expressed the British solders’ smirks and the Bostonians’ despair. These mismatched expressions affirm the British’s ruthless, oppressive authority. In the end Revere prejudicially mimics the Boston Massacre to describe the British’s man slaughtering