ipl-logo

Bostonians And British Soldiers In Paul Revere's Bloody Massacre

1369 Words6 Pages

Soldiers enveloped in red drilled into formation. Muskets loaded and at hand, the men took aim. “BANG! BANG! BANG!” exploded from the British muskets and thundered across the Boston quiet evening. Once the sulfuric cloud of smoke vanished, seven redcoats displayed a despicable smile. According to Boston Massacre Historical Society, three – blood stained – victims laid dead and two other victims were doomed with the same fate. Six other Bostonians were wounded. Many (British resentful) colonists’ minds were infested with this scene, depicted in Paul Revere’s engraving, after the Boston Massacre transpired. Oil was poured upon the flames of revolution as the engraving shows the faces of British soldiers with mischievous content. Little did the colonists know the bitter depiction of the 1770s “Bloody Massacre” blinded them from the truth.
On the evening of March 5, 1770, …show more content…

Revere segregates the Bostonians and British soldiers on opposing sides to illustrate the oppressed and the oppressor. Viewers constantly dart their eyes between the British and the Bostonians to analyze their contrasting characteristics. Revere excludes all Bostonians’ violence towards the British soldiers to stir up sympathy towards the Bostonians. Observers can see everything clearly to satisfy Revere’s desire of degrading the British reputation. The sharp buildings depict the exact location where the massacre took place. Revere plans to use the detailed illustration of the location to inject patriotism and anger into Boston visitors, who know where three Boston died. He openly expressed the British solders’ smirks and the Bostonians’ despair. These mismatched expressions affirm the British’s ruthless, oppressive authority. In the end Revere prejudicially mimics the Boston Massacre to describe the British’s man slaughtering

Show More
Related
279 Words | 2 Pages

Paul Revere, a horse man, that shouted “The redcoats are coming”.this article is going to be all about him. In these next few paragraphs I will answer how the point of view presented in “Excerpt from Mr. Revere and I”, and explain the point of view presented in “Excerpt from The Many Rides of Paul Revere: The Boston Tea Party”. The point of view of “paul revere and I” is first person.you can tell by how the text it uses I,me in the text it states “I cold see,and here,sam atoms” this shows that it is first person because it uses I in narrative tone.the point of view in “The Many Rides of Paul Revere: The Boston Tea Party” is third person because it uses he,her in the text it states “where he boarded another ferry that cared him” this shows

Read More
89 Words | 1 Pages

Colonist Perspective On the evening of March 5, 1770, five innocent civilians were brutally murdered in the streets of Boston at the hands of corrupt British Red Coats. Our brothers and sisters, we peacefully protesting the corrupt, British imposed taxation without our representation. Among those whose lives were taken was Crispus Attucks, a former Black slave. The brutality expressed by the British is foreshadowing for more restrictions and intervention to come. The only way we can defeat British corruption is by coming together as one under this pertinent cause.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

In the early 1760’s, the tension between the people in Boston and the British soldiers started to grow until in early 1770, when the two groups reached their breaking point. On March 5, 1770, a group of men started intimidating a British soldier; he soon called for assistance but eventually the crowd had grown to practically one hundred people. Captain Thomas Preston and seven other soldiers arrived, trying to calm the situation down, but to no avail. A soldier fired into the crowd followed by the other soldiers firing soon after, resulting in five people being killed. Captain Thomas Preston happened to be arrested and charged with murder.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

In the text, Philbrick's selection of primary sources serve to develop his thesis into multiple authentic and surreal accounts of differing perspectives between loyalists and patriots. In his focus on primary sources, Philbrick knits together firsthand accounts from various Bostonian residents such as John Adams and John Andrews with events leading up to the war. For the most part, reading each journal and firsthand documentary is refreshing, but there are various points when Philbrick's reliance upon certain accounts prove to be unnecessary and exhaustive. He references to countless sources, and while most were significant, many appeared to have miniscule relevance to the main takeaway. For instances, Philbrick purposed John Andrew's narrative to aid readers in understanding the context of everything taking place in Boston during the 1700's, but most of the information referring to Andrew's personal accounts and the British's evacuation appears

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

The 2nd continental congress was a group of leaders from the thirteen colonies they discussed what to do about Britain and whether or not to actually claim independence from Britain or not. They were also the ones to sign and send the declaration of independence to the king. Speaking of the declaration of independence it was actually made on july 4th 1776 in Pennsylvania. "join or die" that was one of the most popular quotes from the revolutionary war this quote was said by Benjamin franklin and it was actually a type of pamphlet and one of the first speaking for American independence but let's first talk about the groups and people fighting for each side. There were many people fighting in this war one of them were called the minutemen these

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

This image tells a tale that the British soldiers premeditatively murdered innocent Boston colonists, unprovoked. In fact, our text defines the Boston Massacre as an “Inflammatory description of a deadly clash between a mob and British soldiers on March 5, 1770, that became a symbol of British oppression for many colonists.” The keyword in this definition is inflammatory. One part of the image I found interesting was the dog in the lower

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

In two famous engravings of the Boston Massacre, Engraving of the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere and The Fruits of Arbitrary Power by Henry Pelham, viewers are given different views of the same event through the use of various artistic techniques. If one looks closer at these two engravings, it becomes apparent that there are differences between how two groups, American Colonists and British Troops, are presented as good, evil, or morally ambiguous. Through the use of various artistic techniques such as color, shading, facial expressions, and text, Revere and Pelham were able to achieve two different expressions and opinions of the same massacre. While Pelham’s engraving appears more neutral in tone, Revere’s engraving includes much more emotional appeal and

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

On March 5, 1770 a street fight occurred between a mob of Boston citizens and British soldiers. The soldiers were increasingly unwelcome in Boston so the citizens threw snowballs, stones, and sticks at the group of soldiers who had been stationed here- the soldiers retaliated. The citizens were very outnumbered and the fight resulted in five deaths and six injuries from Boston. Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty named this event the Boston Massacre. The morning after, John Adams was sitting in his law office when Paul Revere revealed an engraving that showed Thomas Preston (captain of the British soldiers) ordering troops to fire at point blank range on the citizens.

Read More
236 Words | 1 Pages

The Bloody Disagreement It was a dark and dreadfully drab day in Boston 1770. Hugh and John nervously stood guard on King Street. As they stood guard, anxiety and fear crept through their bones. The reason for all of this was because of disagreement between King George and the colonists.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Which resulted in much propaganda, such as Paul Reevers paints. In his paintings he only shows the soldiers firing at the colonists, and does not include the colonists throwing clubs or snowballs. Paul Revere also over exaggerated the wounds of the colonists to make the battle appear more gruesome, also, he left out wounds that the soldiers received from the colonists. Therefore creating propaganda, and over exaggeration the event to convince that the Boston Massacre was a

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

This lesson was effective because it showed you what different people thought of the same event. In many people 's accounts it was biased, but others close to what we believe is the truth. An example of a biased depiction of the Massacre is Paul Revere 's engraving, which he actually copied from Henry Pelham. It depicts a line of British soldiers firing on unarmed colonists, and the British commander giving them an order to fire, while in real life the colonists were taunting the British and has weapons such as sticks, snowballs and small knives. Also, only one British soldier fired after a colonist hit him with a stick, which proves that while Revere 's engraving is famous, it is not even close to accurate.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

The people of Boston had a town meeting. They wanted to remove all of the British soldiers and convict the soldiers that took place in the Boston Massacre of murder. A trial was held. John Adams and Josiah Quincy II defended the soldiers, eventually they were acquitted. However, later

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

The first misconception people have about the Boston Massacre

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.

Read More

More about Bostonians And British Soldiers In Paul Revere's Bloody Massacre

Related Topics

Open Document