ipl-logo

Brian Terrell And The Death Penalty

1116 Words5 Pages

Brian Terrell, was executed at the age of 47, after being accused of the murder of his mother’s friend, John Watson. After being held in the death row for 20 years and was denied of request for a stay by the Supreme Court he was executed on December 9, 2015 at 12:52 a.m.. His execution was delayed due to appeals. After all appeals were rejected, the nurse had difficulty locating a vein in Brian’s arm which could be used. Eventually, the needle was placed in his hand. Brian declined to say any final words, although he mouthed “I didn’t do it” before he was executed. Terrell's lawyers say that no physical evidence links him to the murder and that this conviction and death sentence are a product of prosecutorial misconduct and false and misleading testimony. …show more content…

Capital punishment has always been a controversial topic on human rights. It is when convicted criminals are put to death with the approval of the government, which is also known as the death penalty. Capital punishment is only allowed after a proper trail for a specific type of crime including crimes such as murder, second degree murder, mass killing, terrorism, and treason. The death penalty happens in the death row, which is where the criminals wait to be executed. It has been banned in many countries, but the United States still allow capital punishment to occur. Ever since 1800, the number of nations who banned capital punishment has increased over time. Till this day, many discuss the righteousness of capital punishment and if it should or should not be authorised. The death penalty is no answer to crime, it should be the last resort to anything. If we continue to practise capital punishment more innocent lives could be at

Show More
Related
241 Words | 1 Pages

He appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but in December, 2003, he was notified that it had declined to hear his case. He soon received a court order announcing that “the Director of the Department of Criminal Justice at Huntsville, Texas, acting by and through the executioner designated by said Director . . . is hereby DIRECTED and COMMANDED, at some hour after 6:00 p.m. on the 17th day of February, 2004, at the Department of Criminal Justice in Huntsville, Texas, to carry out this sentence of death by intravenous injection of a substance or substances in a lethal quantity sufficient to cause the death of said Cameron Todd Willingham.”

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

In April of 1980, Bobby James Moore of Harris County Texas murdered a 73 year old store owner, James McCarble, in an attempted robbery. After the court hearings, Bobby Moore was sentenced to death in July of 1980, but has been sitting on death row until now. The court has recently brought his case up again to determine if the death sentence was ethic and correct for his circumstance. Five of the current Supreme Court justices have agreed that Moore should not be given the death sentence because he was intellectually disabled. Bobby Moore’s lawyer argued in defense of Moore saying that when he was given the death penalty that they were using an outdated definition of intellectual disability.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

The verdict in this case generated an epidemic of outrage throughout the world. I agree with the not-guilty verdict on the murder one and two charges; however, the evidence is not as incontrovertible as some have suggested. I also agree that there was some mischaracterization around the 31 days; yet, to trivialize this behavior as simply immature is inaccurate. The way Casey handled the death was inexcusable.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

James Driskell, 48 was wrongfully convicted of first degree murder in 1991, when his friend Perry Dean Harder was found shot to death in Winnipeg. As a result, Driskell, 48, spent 12 years behind bars because of his conviction. Furthermore, James Driskell was always maintaining his innocence and his conviction were cancelled by federal justice minister. His case was investigated and overlooked again. According to the final report of the investigation it was found that he did not have fair trial.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

After a while they decided to drop the charges and move on with the case. June 1st was the start of this horrific event and when he was sentenced the death penalty there was relief and sorrow in the court room on March 16, 2004. He still awaits the day for his death by lethal injection. As the trial progressed they investigated his motivations for murdering his wife and unborn child and came across

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

Mr. Dill’s execution results from unfair treatment alongside prejudice and racial bias in the court system. M. Dill was executed as a result of capital murder. It was revealed that he was disabled and there was unease about Dill not receiving the proper legal treatment and help. Stevenson states, “He would never have been convicted of capital murder if he had just had the money for a decent lawyer. He would never have been sentenced to death if someone had investigated his past.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

In the United States death penalty is the execution of either a male or female offender, as said offender has received a sentenced of death for a criminal offense, after they have been convicted by a court of law. The term death penalty is sometimes used interchangeably with capital punishment, because there is a possibility of their sentence being commutated to life imprisonment if another court over turns the original ruling. The metaphysical and ethical basis for the death penalty for some is fundamentally wrong and against moral possibility. Those also point out that the complicated legal process and the extremely high costs involved in the pre-trial and trial phases for all death penalty cases, there for able makes it an

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

Read More
1638 Words | 7 Pages

Many claim that capital punishment as given in the Argument Essay on Capital Punishment is “against human rights for life and it is cruel to not give criminals another chance.” For capital punishment it could perhaps be said it is some efficient way to get “rid” of fierce criminals but it certainly has many individuals and morals which oppose his punishment. For instance there are a band of individuals who are the Anti-Capital Punishment who claim capital punishment is morally wrong claiming in certainly back to the government on how they don’t have the right to take a life. Capital Punishment, for many might think that its murder that goes against human right and that the only difference between murder and this punishment is that the government kills them instead. They are correct to say this because they believe that everyone might make mistakes and they should have the right to correct them.

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment is the lawful deprivation of life upon a person as a punishment, usually for a serious criminal offense. In developed countries, the death penalty is always replaced by a trial. Execution can only be performed by an authorized representative of the state, otherwise, this action is considered murder which is punishable by the law. In many cases, the capital punishment is replaced by life imprisonment or a long-term imprisonment by court orders. On rare occasions, a person sentenced to death by a court can be pardoned by the highest state or state official (president, monarch, the prime minister, etc.).

Read More
1561 Words | 7 Pages

Capital punishment is the killing of a person as punishment for committing crime. In many world countries, capital punishment has been removed, but other countries, like the United States, criminals are still killed is they commit bad crimes such as murder. In many countries of the world, there is a big argument about capital punishment. There are people supporting this type of punishment while there are other people opposing the punishment. The people supporting capital punishment have maintained their position by saying that some crimes can only be punished by killing the offender.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Today, I Barbara Terrell, will inform you all on why the death penalty should be abolished. My son was put to death for the 1992 murder of 70-year-old John Watson. But no hard evidence had proven he was at the scene of the crime and two testimonies were later found to be inaccurate. Yet on the 9th of December at 12:52 pm, my son took his last breath.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that a poll from 1994 showed that 80% of Americans support the death penalty? The death penalty has been in effect since the founding of our country and still remains to this day. It has been proven effective, yet there are many opponents of it who call it cruel or flawed. We should maintain capital punishment because it deters crime, helps the victim 's family and provides justice, and is better than life imprisonment. One reason to use capital punishment, is that it deters crime.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Alexius Sparkman Dr. Ernest Williamson III English Composition II 19 April 2017 Death Penalty The death penalty is a controversial capital punishment which is given against a crime usually involving murder. It is controversial because many people support it while many others condemn it. It is a big ongoing controversial societal issue in the United States and many other parts of the world.

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.

Read More

More about Brian Terrell And The Death Penalty

Related Topics

Open Document