ipl-logo

Bridger Wells Illegal Posse

531 Words3 Pages

In Bridger Wells, Nevada in 1885 two characters known as Art Croft and Gil Carter ride into town and enter Darby’s Saloon. When these two entered the environment was repressed due to recent incidents of “cattle-rustling”. The townsfolk suspect that Art and Gil are hustlers. Shortly after a man enters the saloon and announces that a person named Larry Kinkaid which was a rancher has been murdered. Immediately after the townsfolk form a posse to pursue the person responsible for the murder. A towns judge informs the posse that they must bring the suspects back for trial and that the formation of the posse is considered illegal because the sheriff is out of town. This is the first element of an infraction of the due process law. This is important …show more content…

They also noticed cattle which are assumed that they are stolen cattle. The illegal posse wakes the three men abruptly then initiated an interrogation with the three men. They are named Donald Martin, Juan Martinez and Alva Hardwicke. During the interrogation David Martin claimed that he purchased the cattle from Kinkaid but received no bill of sale and because of this no one believed David Martin. The posse immediately wanted to have the three men hanged. After this conclusion Juan Martinez tries to escape and they find Kinkaid’s gun. This element is also an infraction of the due process law. Majority of the members are jumping to conclusions and not giving the men an impartial trial and a trial by ones’ peers. Also the town judge said that they must bring the suspects back for a trial. Another reason why this element is posing as an infraction to the due process law is because technically all this evidence is illegally gained since the posse formed is considered illegal. This is important because the three men are supposed to have trial with an impartial or trial by their peers and the evidence was gained illegally. This means that the evidence would have been not

Show More
Related
455 Words | 2 Pages

Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

Facts A lady had an abortion performed through back alley means, and had medical complications that resulted in her being in the hospital and questioned by police. She gave them the name of the petitioner, Julius Wolf. The police then followed up on the lead and entered his office without a search warrant and seized items as evidence, one of which was a list of patients. The police then used that evidence to gather more testimony against Wolf.

Read More
853 Words | 4 Pages

Tuan Taruselli-Stormes Professor Monica Swaner English 102 February 20, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel” October 16, 2002, P.J. Haselton filed court documents from the case of Kipland Philip Kinkel. This was a trial based on the 111 years and 8 months’ life term sentence Kinkel had received form an earlier trial for four counts of murder and 26 counts of attempted murder. Through this trial, they recapped the original trial, and deliberated over the evidence presented by Mr. Kinkel’s lawyers. Judge Haselton entertained the courts with their premises for grounds of inhumane violations of article I, section 15, and Article I, section 16, of the Oregon State Constitution.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Ron Stone, a police drug informant disappeared on January 22nd 1977 only for his body to be found two months later on the banks of River Stanislaus, miles from Sonora. The victim had been working as a drug informant for narcotic detectives. His main duty was to set up Christopher Towler by introducing him to two undercover agents who would arrest him as he tried to sell them cocaine. The set up was successful and Towler was arrested and convicted on charges of selling cocaine. In the course of his trial and before his conviction, Towler had expressed his hatred for snitches and the fact that he believed that they should be killed.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

However, the main affect this decision has on today’s society is the way justice must be carried out in the court of law and the way a person’s rights should be protected even if they’re guilty or

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

In the court of law, everyone is guilty until proven innocent. Thus, Hobart Ison was guilty when killing Hugh O’ Connor. Though by law Hobart was a murderer, many question that very decision. Though a killer, locals of urban Kentucky would argue that his actions are justifiable. Elizabeth Barret creates Stranger with a Camera as a tool to look into those justifications and see the reasons Ison murdered O’Connor.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The vital issue of this time is that there is a Mexican American man being trialed by a jury that are not essential

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

These men worked hard herding, branding, and tending to cattle from sun up until sun down. However, over the years the image of the cowboy has been blurred by media. Often times when someone thinks of cowboys they think of a vicious gunslinger who is always looking for a fight. In reality, many cowboys could not even afford a gun. Regardless, throughout Kelton’s novel, The Day the Cowboys Quit, he was able to effectively portray the correct speech patterns, distinguishing characteristics, and lifestyle of the Texas

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

Fracture is a movie that focuses on the court proceedings of an attempted murder trial and emphasizes the legal aspects of this event. In the film, there are several instances in which the Constitutional Amendments are used in the movie as positive or negative rulings in the court. Because this is a movie follows a complex court case, it is an excellent source for these Constitutional Amendments and provides a multitude of examples to accurately represent the commonly used amendments in trials and arrests. This movie focuses primarily on the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, as well as the basic concepts of criminal justice.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

At 9:33 p.m., the night of Buck’s disappearance, Judge Miller came in the two-stories mansion, to the living room to read the today’s newspaper. He noticed there was something not thats right in his mansion, but there was a missing dog, which is Buck. Judge Miller looked everywhere in his mansion and his woody property. Toots and Ysabel were still in the kitchen, the maids were sweeping the the black and white pattern tiles in the the same room with them. Judge Miller asked the maids where is Buck and they did not answer.

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

This shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Every person on this planet has the ability to make choices. People have been created with minds to convince, control, and problem solve. Similarly, other people’s influence has great power to change, persuade, and spread rumors. The novel To Kill a Mockingbird written by Harper Lee, portrays many examples of people who were persuaded and changed from his or her own mind and decisions, or the effect of someone else’s. Injustice is rampant throughout the book, in Tom Robinson’s verdict, Boo Radley’s precarious situation, and with Scout’s situation at school.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

The criminal justice system has a set of rules it follows when arresting, interrogating, and placing the accused on trial. These rules are known as procedural rights. Procedural rights are the rights of the accused/defendant, when going through the criminal justice system. They are the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution (Bohm, 2018). Also, known as the Bill of Rights.

Read More
245 Words | 1 Pages

The due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary of life, liberty or property by the government outside the sanction of law. One of the pros of the Due process is that accused gets to enjoy all Constitutional protections of law and the entire process is fair and well balanced. However the con is that it takes the time, hardship on the victims and their families in having to be at every hearing.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

This aspect is concerned with the powers that be placing the defendant on trial, and proving that a law had been violated by

Read More

More about Bridger Wells Illegal Posse

Related Topics

Open Document