ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of State Of Oregon Vs Kipland

853 Words4 Pages

Tuan Taruselli-Stormes Professor Monica Swaner English 102 February 20, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of “State of Oregon v. Kipland Philip Kinkel” October 16, 2002, P.J. Haselton filed court documents from the case of Kipland Philip Kinkel. This was a trial based on the 111 years and 8 months’ life term sentence Kinkel had received form an earlier trial for four counts of murder and 26 counts of attempted murder. Through this trial, they recapped the original trial, and deliberated over the evidence presented by Mr. Kinkel’s lawyers. Judge Haselton entertained the courts with their premises for grounds of inhumane violations of article I, section 15, and Article I, section 16, of the Oregon State Constitution. Judge Haselton presented a …show more content…

The following morning, he went to Thurston High School and began shooting students. During his shooting spree, he murdered four people, including his parents, and injured 26 others. Kinkel confessed to committing these malicious crimes. The police searched his house and found a large amount of bomb making material, improvised, explosives, literature, and an arsenal of weapons. Kinkel was found guilty and sentenced to 111 years 8 months (para 1). Kinkel had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia and depression. He also had a very long blood line history of mental illness. Medical experts evaluated Kinkel to the possibility of him being able to be rehabilitated and possibilities of returning to a regular life. The experts were very skeptical and doubtful. His sentence was challenged as inhumane, but Oregon State Constitution was very clear about his …show more content…

Other court cases were used during this trial to show their rulings and that they were not found inhumane. The effective use of logos in the court document helps persuade the audience that the case of Oregon Vs Tuel, were Mr. Tuel who committed a less offensable crime, but still received a life sentence that was within the guidelines of the state constitution. Judge Haselton of the Oregon Court of Appeal effectively uses rhetorical appeals to support the court’s original sentence as constitutional and fair. The use of expert doctors Bolstad and Sacks to determine that the possibility of rehabilitation is almost impossible and very unlikely for Mr. Kinkel. Also, the defendant interpretation of the Articles I, 15, was misinterpreted. Kinkel stated that the article was cruel and unusual. Judge Haselton pointed out that there might have been a chance of rehabilitation, but he was thinking of the people of Oregon when he passed down his verdict.

Show More
Related

Summary Of Cobbs V. Cal 3d

793 Words | 4 Pages

Case Citation: Cobbs v Grant, 8 Cal 3d 229 (1972) Procedural History: The case for the judgement on the malpractice suit against Grant was held in a trial court. For the returned verdict against the defendant, the appeal was held in the Court of Appeal. Legal Issue: The case was brought before the jury to decide and analyze two legal issues.

Read More

Mayella Ewell Case Report

983 Words | 4 Pages

Good morning I am Luke Thomsen, I am representing the State of Maycomb on a case about Sheriff Heck Tate’s poor investigation. On two counts we will first hear about his poor investigation in the Tom Robinson V, Mayella Ewell case and in the death of Bob Ewell for we never found out who truly murdered Bob Ewell for Sheriff Heck was too lazy to document it. THE THEME AND THEORY

Read More

Persky Vs Brock-Turner Essay

361 Words | 2 Pages

In the January 29, The Stanford Daily editorial Stanford, California, it debates the different essential of the principle of morality and identified Brock Turner had applied a use of force in raping an unconscious woman behind the dumpster. Furthermore, the young man attended Stanford University and participated in his college swim team dreamt of partaking in the Olympus. The victim heartfelt statement during the trial is disregarded because he comes from a class of privilege and is a man. Not to mention, Brock Turner’s father wrote a letter to expressing the universalizability to court saying, “my son’s life shouldn’t be ruined over 20 minutes of action (Dreher,Rod).” Therefore, Aaron Persky who is a California judge implemented an ethical decision that contemplated the clarity around both the specific choice and decision then declared a six months sentenced ruling.

Read More

Essay On Kansas Vs Hendricks

756 Words | 4 Pages

In a 5 to 4 decision the courts ruled against Hendricks. The Supreme Courts agreed with the act the definition of mental abnormal is a condition that affects the emotions, and this predispose the person to commit sexual violent acts. This makes the person a menace to society affecting the safety and health of others. Also, the courts said the act was not a criminal proceeding, so double jeopardy and ex post facto is not a factor. Involuntary confinement was not a form of punishment, But The supreme court if agreed that the act made by Kansas would limited offenders eligible for confinements to those that can not control their dangerous situations.

Read More

Kennedy Vs Louisiana Case Study

688 Words | 3 Pages

The state considered their own assimilation of the Eighth Amendment which the use of capital punishment for child rapists is not held within this certain case. The court believes that there is a significant distinction between the rape of a child, or any person is society or murdering them. The court did acknowledge that both crimes are heinous but believes the imposing this punishment for this specific situation violates Kennedy’s Eighth amendment right and is considered to be cruel and unusual

Read More

The Killer At Thurston High Summary

1407 Words | 6 Pages

The Killer at Thurston High Summary: In September 1998, Kip Kinkel admitted to killing his guardians in their home on May 20, 1998 and the following day, strolling into the Thurston High School cafeteria and splashing understudies with 50 rounds from a self-loading rifle, killing two understudies, Ben Walker, 16, and Mikael Nickolauson, 17, and injuring 25 others. Kip was accused of four checks of bothered homicide and 26 tallies of exasperated endeavoured murder (for the 25 understudies he injured, in addition to his later ambush on a police investigator.) In November 1999, he was sentenced to over 111 years in jail, without a shot of parole.

Read More

Roper V. Simmons Essay

872 Words | 4 Pages

The most important issue that must be addressed in this case is the principle of the “evolving standards of decency” and the uses of a national consensus. The “evolving standards of decency” were developed by Trop v. Dulles and have been implemented in one way or another in all of the precedents dealing with “cruel and unusual” punishment. It is important to treat these principles as an important aspect of “cruel and unusual” punishment jurisprudence, therefore turning from these set of principles would be foolish and a disregard for every precedent. However, it is important to acknowledge that each case satisfies the standards by using a different method; some use the presence or lack of state legislature as a judgment of consensus while others look at foreign countries.

Read More

Mcmartin Day Care Abuse In The Crucible

773 Words | 4 Pages

Innocent people who are incriminated under improper evidence are hanged. Parallel in the McMartin day care abuse case, the McMartin family, who administrate the establishment, and other members are accused illegally of having abused sexually numerously of the children under their vigilance. The accusations used against the McMartin

Read More

Tom Robinson Vs. Mayella In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee

933 Words | 4 Pages

Sophia P. Olsen Amber Tomas Laungage Arts H 20 March 2023 Tom Robinson VS Mayella Imagine sentinceing an innocent man to death. Are you really going to kill an innocent man? How will you be able to sleep at night when you know you sent an innocent man to death?

Read More

What Is The 4th Amendment Fair

138 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment the Search and Seizure amendment was first passed by Congress on September 25, 1789 (National Constitution Center) that states the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (National Constitution Center). For the first one hundred years after this amendment was This amendment of the Constitution has been used by both civilians and governmental officials as proof of why they believe an incident that occurred was fair, or unfair. However, there have been times when deciding the fairness or unfairness has not been crystal clear. For instance, the case of Tennessee v. Garner that was first argued on October 30, 1984, and later decided upon on March

Read More

Knapp V State Summary

442 Words | 2 Pages

History: Knapp was convicted of murder, he appealed. Issue: May the falsity of

Read More

How Does Tom Robinson Show Innocence In To Kill A Mockingbird

732 Words | 3 Pages

In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee the term mockingbird symbolizes innocence in a person. In the novel it focuses on the fact that innocence, represented by the mockingbird, can be wrongfully harmed. There are two characters: Tom Robinson and Arthur “Boo” Radley that are supposed to represent the mockingbird. In the novel, Tom Robinson is the best example of a mockingbird because he is prosecuted for a crime he did not commit. Also, he was judged unfairly based on the color of his skin in his trial.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

322 Words | 2 Pages

Execution by legal order, otherwise known as the death penalty, is an unconstitutional punishment. Since 1976, there have been 1,425 executions in the United States (“Death Penalty Info”). Although the death rate for these capital punishments has gone down since 1999, however the United States is ranked 5th in the world for most executed by legal order “(Von Drehle)”. Many of these convicts are not given a second chance or given any other option of punishment. Retrials are important because some of these felons aren’t entirely guilty.

Read More

Plea For Mercy Speech

1409 Words | 6 Pages

In May 1924, two boys, Nathan Leopold Jr. and Richard Loeb, sought to commit the perfect crime: kidnapping and murdering their 14-year-old neighbor, Robert Franks. However, instead of executing the perfect crime, they are apprehended the following day and sentenced to receive the death penalty. Their parents hire a defense attorney to represent Leopold and Loeb in court named Clarence Darrow, who made one of the most influential and well-known speeches against the death penalty: “A Plea for Mercy.” Darrow utilizes historical references, logical and emotional appeals, anaphora, and persona, to convince the court not to employ the death penalty for Leopold and Loebs’ case.

Read More

Death Penalty Thesis

1736 Words | 7 Pages

Because of this, the United States as a united people must find the best solution to the growing issue of the effectiveness of the death penalty as capital punishment. In “The Republican Party, Conservatives, and the Future of Capital Punishment,” the issue of the death penalty’s effectiveness is expanded on in evaluating how political affiliations determine a criminal’s life or death. The eighth ammendment states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (Constitution). With the few people that survived the lethal injection, all of them said the same thing.

Read More

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of State Of Oregon Vs Kipland

Related Topics

Open Document