More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis julius caesar
Analysis of Julius Caesar as a tragedy
Human attributes of characters in julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During a fiery dispute at the tents, Brutus is infuriated and accuses Cassius of corrupting his army: “Let me tell you, Cassius, you yourself are much condemned to have an itching palm to sell and mart your offices for gold to undeservers.” Brutus is accusing Cassius of selling important positions in his army to unqualified people. With unqualified army officials, Cassius’s army has a likely chance to fail. Brutus now realizes that Cassius had manipulated him and only cared for money and political power. Brutus is deeply angered because he killed Caesar to combat corruption: “Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake?
Brutus and Antony speak in Caesar's funeral, they use ethos, pathos, and logos to get their point across. With the use of the pathos, logos, and ethos Brutus gets the attention of the commoners. He asks the commoners if what he is going to say is going to offend them, if it does he asks of them to leave there and they all tell Brutus no. Antony speaks before Brutus and gets his point across but fails at his point and just gets the crowd thinking. Brutus than uses his speech techniques to win over the commoner’s ears to listen to him.
Brutus has very strong feelings towards Caesar and him becoming the king of Rome. He believes that if Caesar becomes king he will be kind at first but then will abuse his powers and make bad choices for Rome. While planning Caesar’s murder Brutus is having a hard time pretending to smile and act as if he was not going to murder anyone. His wife Portia, knows that something is bothering him and begs him to tell her but he will not say a thing. Caesar is not listening to his sign from the soothsayer to beware and is still deciding to go.
Logic or Emotion? What would appeal to someone more for them to understand someone's side, logic or emotion? This question is relatable to a subject to a Shakespearean play with the speeches between Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus. There are many arguments of who had the better speech but it's not who had a better speech but who used the different techniques better.
When Brutus was talking to the conspirators Brutus was going back and forth think if he should help the conspirators kill Julius Caesar. He was going back and forth because he was thinking of the power he could have and could rule Rome. The reason behind Brutus killing Caesar was for the better of Rome. If Brutus would not have killed Caesar, Rome would have turned into a dictatorship, and in turn it would have ruined Rome and all of its people. Brutus did not kill Julius just for the power to rule Rome, he killed Julius to save Rome from Caesar’s dictatorship.
And while Brutus did work in part with other conspirators, which eventually led to him killing Caesar, he did it for a more morally sound reason which was that Caesar was going to cause the downfall of Rome because he was too ambitious, which is ironic because Caesar's death led to a string of unfit leaders, and civil unrest that eventually led to the downfall of the roman empire. Brutus was also focused on preventing corruption. “The name of Cassius honors this corruption,/ And chastisement doth therefore hide his head (IV.iii.15-6)... Remember March, the ides of March remember./ Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake” (IV.iii.18-9).
Jiselle White Ashford PreAP English 10 4 April 2023 Emotion or Credibility? Consider a time when you tried to persuade your parents to get the newest phone, a new car, or the latest shoes. Did you use credibility, emotion, or logic? There are many ways to convince others, but figuring out the best way to twist someone's arm is what makes persuasion either a strong or weak argument depending on how it is executed. In the play, No Fear Shakespeare Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Calpurnia and Decius present convincing arguments for Julius Caesar.
In Act 2, Brutus prepares to join the conspirators in order to assassinate Caesar. After the conspirators leave the senate, Portia sends a messenger to observe Brutus and Caesar. Portia briefly talks to Soothsayer in Act 1, and he says something bad may happen. Brutus must make a sacrifice by assassinating his close friend Caesar for the benefit of the Roman population. Furthermore, the conservative conspirators that had encouraged Caesar's assassination fell shortly after Brutus' suicide in 42 BCE, and Portia too had committed suicide, allegedly by inhaling hot coals.
Shakespeare uses reference to display a confused emotion to characterize Hamlet as a naïve character, one who does not know anything about death. As Hamlet observed the grave digger, he thinks about Julius Caesar. He compares Julius Caesar to his father to emphasize the death. Hamlet thinks that someone as great as Caesar wouldn’t be died. According to one of Shakespeare’s book, Caesar was favored by many people because he was the Roman leader.
Secondly, Brutus joined the conspiracy to kill Caesar because of his concern over the potential corruption of Rome's political system under Caesar's rule. As Caesar's power and influence grew, there were worries that he would surround himself with supporters who would prioritize their own interests over the well-being of the Roman people. Brutus feared that this environment of favoritism and corruption would erode the balances that were crucial for maintaining a just and stable government. By eliminating Caesar, Brutus believed that he was safeguarding the integrity of Rome's political institutions and preventing the rise of a repressive government. During the Feast of Lupercal scene in Act 1, Scene 2, Cassius takes advantage of the celebration
In Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” he explores what constitutes an effective argument by comparing Brutus’ funeral speech with Antony’s which ultimately succeeds. Its success is due to Antony’s expertful employment of various persuasions such as emotional appeal, rhetorical questions, and his credibility. In order to make the Roman people sympathize with him he utilizes emotional appeal, claiming "[he] [came] to bury Caesar, not to praise him" (3.2.74). This statement not only draws out sympathy from the Roman people, but also establishes Antony’s honorable intentions in his speech. This alone would not make his speech more effective than Brutus’.
Brutus, a loyal, murderous, and honorable friend to Julius Caesar, and Mark Antony, a well-loved server and friend to Caesar as well, both verbally battle it out through speech during Caesar's funeral to win during the hearts of Rome. As one puts reason over emotion, the other puts emotion over reason. Mark Antony's strong feelings for Caesar move the Romans deeply, placing much emphasis on how Brutus' guilt and stoicism for the death of Caesar is not enough. Caesar is spoken highly of and acknowledged as a friend by both Caesar and Brutus. As Brutus says, "As he was fortunate, I rejoice at it.
Cassius influenced Brutus to conspire against Caesar by stating, Caesar “is now become a god… and his name has been sounded more than [Brutus’s]” (Act 1, Scene 2, Line 118-145-6). Cassius’s arguments convinced Brutus in proving Caesar's murder would be just, but Caesar’s death is unjust because he is being murdered out of Brutus and Cassius’s jealousy. Both of the individuals are envious of the power that Caesar is being given by the people of Rome and want to end his life before they will lose their own power in the senate after Caesar becomes king. Brutus’ naive mind was easily convinced by Cassius that Caesar was not the best choice to assume the Roman throne because he would not listen to their political thoughts.
Brutus, According to Shakespeare The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a Shakespearean play and representation of the assassination of Caesar, is a well written and developed story in which the build up of the characters is very well done. As a matter of fact, the developing of Brutus, the tragic hero on the play, is one of the most important characters and therefore one of the better explained and exposed. Brutus is a character that is marked with three traits that allow him to be the one responsible for Caesar's assassination. Indeed, Brutus is naive, well-intended and hypocrite, as seen when the conspirators convince him to be part of it, and be one of the most important figures in it.
When Cassius sends the letters that command Brutus to “awake and see thyself!” he makes use of the character’s hamartia and uses it in his favour. It is in fact these letters that ultimately lead Brutus to join the conspiracy, a major step towards the accomplishment of Caesar’s fate. Without the use of deception, it is most likely that Brutus would not fall into Cassius’ power-hungry hands; and without Brutus being in the conspiracy, the events of the play (and of history) would have followed completely different routes, showing the power deception has in certain circumstances. In the end of the play, Cassius shows evidence of stoical thinking , as he finally believes in “the determining power of Fate”, and how his vindictiveness has led to him discovering the “worthy cause of suicide”.
