ipl-logo

Brutus Use Of Rhetorical Devices Used In Julius Caesar

438 Words2 Pages

Persuading an audience is difficult, but rhetorical devices can change arguments to appeal to the assortment of people listening. After killing Julius Caesar, Brutus presents a speech to the plebeians of Rome explaining why the assassination was necessary. As Brutus attempts to gain support from his fellow countrymen he utilizes ethos by proclaiming, ”believe me / for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour” (III.ii.1547-1548). The citizens hold Brutus in high regard and so he makes them all remember the positive way they think of him and uses that feeling so they all believe him. Antony has more tack as he foresees the fickle nature of the plebeians and uses pathos more often. After keeping his word and not directly undermining the speech …show more content…

Compared to the Ethos that Brutus used, the people connected with Antony’s speech much more and were in turn more likely to remain by his side. Once Brutus thought he had the attention of the people, he used the literary device Logos to attempt and keep people by his side despite not realizing what little effect it really had on them. The way that Brutus utilized logos was by claiming, “I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I / slew him” (III.ii.1560-1561). Despite the obvious meaning that Brutus was afraid of the power Caesar would gain and what he would use it for the citizens decide they want Brutus to become the new leader and completely miss the point which shows that logos was not a good device to use in this situation. Once Brutus had already made the mistake of using logos, Antony delivered his speech with plenty of pathos, repetition, and a dramatic pause. Before stopping his speech Antony weakly delivers his last emotional line of pathos, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, / And I must pause till it come back to me” (III.ii.1650-1651). After this line Antony cries over Caesar’s body and allows the people to discuss what he has said this

Show More
Related
491 Words | 2 Pages

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” (George Orwell, 1984). William Shakespeare intensified his quality of work by insinuating manipulative and persuasive language within his writing. Cassius, a loyal server to Brutus, was easy to coax Brutus into rebelling against Julius Caesar, gaining an additional member to his group of conspirators. Cassius altered Brutus’ thoughts of Caesar’s ruling, within the use of multiple effective rhetorical techniques.

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

In his speech, Antony uses emotion (pathos) to appeal to the Plebeians and make them see his point.*Antony starts off his speech by saying “Friends, Romans, Countrymen” (JC III, ii, 82). He refers to the Plebeians as his friends even though they are completely different. Antony does this because he knows he will have an easier time winning over the Plebeians if they know that they are friends and equal to Antony. On the other hand, Brutus’ speech is much less successful in winning over the Plebeians because he uses logos. Brutus believes that the Plebeians will side with him through logic.

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

So it is all on the line for Antony and Brutus. Brutus did a great job of using logos and lots of ethos in his speech, but most of his reasons to justify Caesar’s slaying were predictions of Caesar’s future behavior. Antony uses a lot of statements that are primarily pathos to persuade the crowd that the great Julius should still be alive. This is most of the reason why Antony’s address is the better of the two. Here are some of the fallacies that Brutus uses.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

To begin, the rhetorical device of logos is very commonly used among those trying to persuade a targeted audience to take their side, using logic, to convey the information. This device is used multiple times throughout Antony’s speech, and is the primary tool focused on by Brutus in his public cry. The contrast is that Brutus is using the device more to show his accountability, honor, and to better reason logistically with the crowd. He also gears more towards the logic of things

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus uses rhetorical questions, faulty reasoning and hyperboles to create the tone of persuasion while convincing the Roman people to be on his side. To start off his funeral speech, he wants the citizens to trust and believe what he has to say about Caesar, Brutus announces; “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect for my honor, that you may believe me”(Shakespeare 42). In this case, faulty reasoning is shown because Brutus has done nothing to prove him honorable to the citizens. Given that, he has no evidence that he is trustworthy, Brutus still try’s to persuade the crowd to believe what he has to say about Caesar is true, which is

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

Antony also says “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar” (Elements 835). This represents that he would rather in a sense have a part of him die with Caesar then to live without

Read More
108 Words | 1 Pages

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Antony uses the rhetorical appeal logos to persuade the Roman people to turn against the conspirators. At the beginning of Antony’s speech, he started off by giving examples of Caesar being a generous leader, so when the ‘poor cried’ out for help, Caesar cried along with them (91). Antony uses the rhetorical appeal logos when he said that Caesar ‘cried’ with the poor. He made an argument that Caesar caried about the Roman people and more deeply, since the conspirator said that they killed Caesar because he is ambitious, but Caesar caried about his countrymen which showed that the conspirators are not honorable.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

The Speeches of Noble Men: Brutus vs Antony In the play Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, two characters, Brutis and Antony, both present speeches to the Plebeians regarding Caesars death. One, of course, is more convincing than the other, and the more convincing one was Antony’s. Although the speeches differ in the usage of logos and pathos, they are similar because they both use rhetorical questions to prove their points, and they both manage to sway the crowd to their side.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

He uses logos to convey this point to the audience. Brutus spoke valiantly at his speech. Brutus uses logos to prove that Caesar died for the good of Rome in this quote, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves”. This shows that Caesar if he was not slain, would have become far too powerful.

Read More

More about Brutus Use Of Rhetorical Devices Used In Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document