Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Honour and loyalty in julius caesar
Honor in julius caesar
Julius caesars leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Honour and loyalty in julius caesar
Honor in julius caesar
Julius caesars leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Honour and loyalty in julius caesar
Everything he did was to protect his dignitas he worked so hard for during his proconsulship in Gaul. Sir Ronald Syme a historian and classicist, long associated with Oxford University and widely regarded as the 20th century's greatest historian of ancient Rome;(in massie, pg.28, 1983) saw that "Caesar was the aggressor; he was fighting not for no nobler cause
The Romans went to war with the Carthaginians three times over the period of 264- 146 B.C. These three wars are known as the three Punic Wars. The first war was inevitable but the other two were not and were caused by the Romans desire for war and power. There were many reasons within the Roman society that could explain why they were so quick to fight. One of these reasons was honor.
Rome’s foreign policy lay with the senate and their military arm. “In all the preparations that are made for war, as well as in the whole administration in the field, they possess an almost absolute
Gaul had shown great amounts of wealth and this is the biggest reason in why Caesar had wanted to begin campaigning in Gaul as general” Due to Caesar gaining large amounts of wealth, the Roman Republic had become excited and this impacted them greatly as they were able to gain portions of this wealth back in the Rome
The Second Punic War is also known as the Second Carthaginian War. This happened between 218 and 201 B. C. This war was one of the many wars that were fought between the Roman Republic and the Carthaginian (Punic) Empire. It is very important to note that the outcome of this war was the creation of the Roman hegemony over the entire western Mediterranean. The Second Punic War also had other names. The Roman called this war the Hannibalic War and the War Against Hannibal.
In this essay, we will look at the causes of the outbreak of Civil War in Rome in 49BC and the reason why Julius Caesar was greatly responsible for it. Although it is clear that Caesar was the main cause of the Civil War, we must not neglect to mention other factors which contributed to it. As such, we will consider whether Caesar’s refusal to give up his armies, the actions of the optimates against the populares or fear of prosecution, led to the war. This essay is, therefore, only concerned with the events leading up to the war and not the specifics of the war itself.
Following the Black Death, the populations in European societies greatly increased, leading to rapid developmental growth. During the 16th and 18th centuries, ideas of power and influence were becoming increasingly common. Empires began to focus efforts on expansion in order to gain power and control over territories. Similarly, ideas of religion also affected societies in this period, and led to reform and changes in the way many nations were governed. Ultimately, these ideas were able to spread rapidly throughout the world due to trade and advancements in technology, specifically in navigation.
An example of Caesar describing the Gaul’s or their actions as dehumanizing: Vercingetorix on being named king by his partisans demanded hostages from all states, ordered a fixed number of soldiers to be sent to him immediately, and determined
Anthony Everitt’s biographical novel Cicero tells the life and times of Cicero in an exemplary way through his knowledge, objective historical judgments, and organization of the text. It is evident in the detail of events that Everitt has a vast knowledge of Cicero’s life, but also of the socioeconomic, cultural, religious, and political culture of Rome. From the beginning of the novel, Everitt approaches the book with a historical perspective, seeking to show what Rome was like in the first century BC by establishing a proper context for Cicero’s political life. Not to mention, Everitt begins the biographical focus of the novel with the famous death of Julius Caesar on the steps of the Senate on the Ides of March, which is at the end of Cicero’s life. This choice to begin near the end of Cicero’s life may seem unusual, but this scene captivates the reader in terms of figurative language and shows what the political instability of Rome caused, that is, the death of Julius Caesar, who only came to power because
It is astonishing how one man can take away another’s life so quickly and easily. It is alarming how one could argue that the murder of Julius Caesar was a group effort, when there is only one man who is behind this horrific feat of hatred. It is amazing how anyone could think that the killing of our powerful leader-to-be could be justified by any reasoning. Ladies and gentlemen, we are standing in the very same room as the murderer of the great Julius Caesar. May I direct your attention to the man guilty of this crime, Marcus Brutus.
Julius Caesar's account of the Gallic Wars, detailed through his book, the Commentarii de Bello Gallico (Commentaries on the Gallic War), substantially contributes to an understanding of the Roman conquest of Gaul. Caesar’s writings of the campaigns and tactics of the conquest provide an extremely valuable observation on the military campaigns and political atmosphere during this time, and further elucidates the wider historical context of the Roman conquest of Gaul. The Commentarii de Bello Gallico possesses great importance as it is the only first hand account of the conflict. Caesar’s account of his conquest contributes a detailed understanding of the operations and might of the Roman military during the long conquest of Gaul.
Here was a Caesar! When comes such another?” (3.2.245-48). The people of Rome would have had freedom under Caesar’s rule. They would have been happy.
It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.
The Romans didn’t have much command over the province, but they did have some connections to the further side of the border. Caesar speedily took benefit of these connections to extend the boundaries of Rome beyond the borders of Gaul. Caesar decided to invade Britain, whose tribes seemed to have close relations with Gaul. These expeditions were well-celebrated by the Romans as for the first time Rome had expanded so far. However, Vercingetorix, a noble tribesman of Gaul, with his men, surprisingly rose against Caesar, threatening his power in Gaul.
NAME – AKUL KHANNA PROFESSOR – KANIKA DANG ENGLISH THESIS PAPER DATE -2ND NOVEMBER 2015 MARK ANTONY’S DEVELOPMENT IN JULIUS CEASAR In the year 44 BC the powerful empire of Rome had lost its ruler due to the assassination led by the senators and Julius Caesar’s brother Brutus. Caesar’s death was a huge setback for Rome and its people and the whole empire was in utter chaos. Mark Antony a very noble, loyal and affectionate friend of Caesar.