ipl-logo

Caligula, The Mad Emperor?

1292 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Chapter 11 The Roman Empire

Dan Cruikshank
Paper
Ancient Greece and Rome
4/24/17
Caligula, The ‘Mad’ Emperor? Throughout the period of Rome’s history there have been many leaders that have been everlastingly glorified because of their major contributions to the Empire of Rome. Names like Julius and Augustus Caesar for instance stick out in the minds of most people still today. However, some who have lead the Roman Empire, have not been so lucky in this deity-like glorification after their deaths. Emperor Caligula, for instance is pegged as being the “Mad” Emperor of Rome. There are many accounts of ancient scholars depicting Caligula as acting insane and illogical. Although unethical Caligula may have been, while he was Emperor, there may still have been a reasoning …show more content…

This included his incestuous relationship with his sisters as well as the glorification of his deceased family members. Caligula’s extravagant lifestyle also showed his turn towards Hellenism, as this was a widespread practice among rulers in the East. Ultimately, Caligula’s downfall was his Hellenistic practices and inexperience in Roman politics, military affairs, and of Rome itself.
Aloys Winterling is a professor in the Department of History at Humboldt University in Berlin. Winterling is also the author of Caligula: A Biography. In this book, Winterling believes that Caligula was not as “mad” or “insane” as is commonly thought. He argues that this depiction is caused by his disunion from the Senate and his emotional instability as Emperor. According to Suetonius, Caligula’s’ Biographer, Caligula was most sought after by the Roman people to be their emperor. After he had first entered the City of Rome, while away for 6 years, it is said that the celebration lasted almost three months and almost 160,000 animals were sacrificed. Caligula had set free all of those who had been imprisoned by Tiberius and had all their documents publicly burned. Caligula even professed to the Senate, the fact that the power was shared between the princeps and themselves …show more content…

Adams argument is another critical aspect into understanding the legacy of Caligula. The fact that Caligula was basically raised to understand ‘power’ as being an absolute entity, was dangerous in Roman aristocratic society. Caligula was simply acting the way he believed one should rule, especially when everyone was seemingly out to get him. However, aristocrats saw his acts as threatening, they wished to discredit him as best they could, and end up killing him over basically having the wrong upbringing. Geoff Adams offers a slightly distinctive focal point on Caligula’s life than that of Winterling. Adams focused more on the historical background of Caligula. This view of Caligula is a better account when interpreting the ‘insanity’ of Caligula, because any person acts the way in which they were raised to. Therefore, since Caligula grew up around Germanicus, he was used to seeing ultimate power exhibited over people in a non-traditional Roman way. Adams book is a superb view into the life of Caligula and shows a little bit better look at the Roman Emperor that Winterling’s. The only reason I have for saying so is because of the different variables they focused on. Winterling’s psychological approach makes complete sense, however it is harder to prove something in the mind of an individual as opposed to observing their

Show More
Related
626 Words | 3 Pages

In 27 BCE (Before Common Era) the Roman Empire was entering its golden age, “The Pax Romana.” During the Pax Romana, the citizens of all Roman cities enjoyed free food and entertainment along with access to all of the Roman amenities such as bathhouses, roads, and mail service. However in 180 CE (Common Era) the Roman empire took a turn for the worse and eventually the last empire fell in 476 CE. The once powerful Roman Empire was in shambles. So what happened to the empire?

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

The great Empire of Rome, the greatest power to have ruled the Mediterranean. The Roman empire thrived in the time of Julius Caesar around 47 BC. Caesar had made Rome into an empire, but after he died, Rome started its downfall. It was unthinkable. The great Roman empire’s reign was over.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

But Sallust tells of how Catiline acted against expectations and Roman nature by saying he: “scion of a noble family, had great vigour both of mind and body, but an evil and

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus People have ruled the Earth for centuries, each notable for their accomplishments or corruption. There have been recorded leaders for civilizations many people have never heard of, except ancient cities like China, Greece, Rome, etc. Rome, being one of the renowned cities, had some great leaders and was popularly known for their exceptional armies and even greater leaders. One of these leaders was Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, or Claudius, who was a great leader for what he achieved.

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

In her chapter on the historiography of Roman exemplarity, Christina Shuttleworth Kraus examines this loss of power through the transition of exempla as the res gestae populi Romani to the res gestae divi Augusti (Kraus, 2). In early Roman history, exemplarity rested in the hands of popular consciousness; the citizens of Rome had the sole power of deciding which events or people to raise up to the status of exempla. This system of exemplarity that is explained in detail by Matthew Roller’s four stage model of the creation of exempla by public discourse (Roller, 216-217). However, Roller’s framework begins to collapse when Augustus intentionally influences exemplary power through his coercive Res Gestae. Rather than looking to the past for the great deeds of common people like the Sabine women or Lucretia, Roman citizens of the Augustan period had their attention directed towards the persona of one man, an exemplar in the form of an emperor.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

When the poet Virgil wrote the national epic The Aeneid between 29 and 19 BC, all written works and conduits for creative expression were monitored by Roman ruler Augustus Caesar – a real-life contention between passion and control. Throughout the excerpt on pages 139 and 140 of Fagle’s translation (which covers themes such as fate, the gods, and divine intervention, and piety), Virgil explores the underlying theme of conflict between desire and duty, emotion, and reason. Exploring irony, the comparison of Dido and Aeneas’ traits, and pietas being a decision, Virgil shows Aeneas to be a flawed, enigmatic epic Roman hero who personifies the human conflict – passion versus control – of the Aeneid and the Roman empire itself. To begin with, it’s

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

A Madman has been Murdered- The assassination of Caligula Caligula, Born Gaius Caesar Germanicus, was assassinated on January 12, 41 AD, by his guardman, who stabbed him 30 times. His wife and daughter were killed shortly after. People are now parading down the streets of Rome, chants stating that the tyrant is dead are heard. Born in Antium, Italy in the year 12 AD, Caligula (born Gaius Caesar Germanicus) was the great grandson of Augustus and the great-great grandson of Julius Caesar.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Old decaying temples were also restored by Emperor Augustus, in attempt to rebuild old moral values. Though the rot had already begun to eat away at the Rome’s morals. The historian Tacitus recorded Calgacus, a leader of the Britons, in addressing the Romans, “we kept even our eyes free from the defilement of tyranny today the boundary of Britain is exposed; beyond us lies no nation, nothing but waves and rocks and the Romans, more deadly still than they, for you find in them an arrogance which no reasonable submission can elude”. Calacus continues “They are unique in being as violently tempted to attack the poor as the wealthy. Robbery, butchery, rapine, the liars call Empire; they create desolation and call it peace.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Lucretius was a Roman poet, famous for Epicurean philosophy. He focused on themes that involved the way in which humans exist in the natural world. Through his ideas of superstition, atoms and mortality, Lucretius’ philosophy introduced a controversial yet systematic natural perspective into a society that was predominantly still reliant on mythical explanations. By emphasizing the importance of personal reasoning, Lucretius influenced many of his successors. At the time of publication, Roman society relied heavily on the idea of various Gods and Goddesses in order to compensate for their lack of understanding of the physical world.

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

The professor tells that Claudius bribed the army to kill his father, so that he can come into power. And similar processes occurred later which led to civil war in Rome. While the passage talks about the good deeds done by Claudius

Read More
1187 Words | 5 Pages

We recognize in the construction of the work „ Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire“, that Edward Gibbon, in the first works a total period of 460 years. He begins in 180 AD and ends in 641 AD. Here we see, that the author is largely concerned on the time especially during and after the fall of Rome. In the chapters four to seven he deals with the successors of Marcus Antoninus, namely Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander and

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

THE aim of this paper is merelyt,o touch lightlyu pon a few of them orei mportanpt roblemso f the imperialg overnmentan d administration, b eginningw ith Julius Caesar. For comparisonsb etween Roman and modern,p articularlyB ritish,i mperialismt,h ose who are interesteds hould consult the writingso n this subject of the scholarly statesmenB ryce and Cromer. The most illuminatingf act that has come to me in recenty ears is that the imperialo rganizationa nd administrationw ere inherited more fromt

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

"He who fiddled while Rome burned. " This phrase has become synonymous with the infamous emperor Nero, a man whose reign was marked by both grand accomplishments and devastating failures. But who was Nero, really? Was he truly the ruthless tyrant that history has painted him to be, or was he a victim of circumstance and bad press? As we delve into the life and legacy of Nero, we will explore the complex and controversial figure who ruled the Roman Empire during the first century AD.

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Suetonius offers a more concise and focused perspective on the role of Emperor Nero in the events leading up to and following the fire in his Suetonius’ Nero. Suetonius' Nero provides a detailed account of Nero's life and reign, including his role in the events leading up to the Great Fire of Rome and the subsequent persecution of Christians. It also offers insights into Nero's personal life, including his relationships with his mother, his wives, and his

Read More

More about Caligula, The Mad Emperor?

Related Topics

Open Document