I like and disliked call of the wild here are the reasons why. I liked call of the wild because buck got find john again and because buck was able to learn how to live in the cold by learning how to dig a hole in the ground, by learning how to eat fast so the other dogs didn’t take his food, by learning how to bit the ice off of his feet, by breaking the ice off of the watering hole, by learning how to steel food from François and Perrault. The reasons why I didn’t like the book is because didn’t like it when buck was captured then beaten and when spitz would be mean to buck and steel his food and his bed when buck got up. What I would change about the story is when buck was bullied by spitz. What I wouldn’t change is when buck found john …show more content…
If the story didn’t have setting there wouldn’t be a story. If there was no conflict then there wouldn’t be a problem in the story or an exciting moment. If there wasn’t foreshadowing then there would be no story. All of these play a big part in the story. The one I think is the most powerful is conflict because there is a lot of problems in the story. The main idea of the story is a dog named buck gets kidnapped in California and then is beaten with a club. Next he was taken and sold in Alaska to two men named François and Perrault. From there he is trained to pull a sled and the team is started for Dawson. There he learned a bunch of ways to survive. When they are all most to Dawson the team and buck are taken away from Perrault and François to these other people who started for Dawson. The people stop at this cabin and that is where john is and he takes buck from them and that is where buck is. Then when buck and john and his helper where at a camping place buck meets a wolf and they become friends. Then buck safes john from droning in a river buck all most dies to. When they are camping buck finds a wolf in the woods and they become wood brothers. Then buck can’t find the wolf then at the end john dies from an