Cantalupo Case Summary

97 Words1 Pages
Hawkins actions were specific for a definite amount of time. In Cantalupo, a brother took away his intoxicated brother’s keys, and was not responsible for preventing him to drive drunk indefinitely, but only when the he undertook to take the keys away. Cantalupo, 47 So. 3d 900. The court reasoned that to hold otherwise would discourage people from undertaking in the first place. Id. Hawkins’s actions were for a specific amount of time since she undertook the take the dog off the street and keep him in the yard until the dog owner would pick him up.

More about Cantalupo Case Summary