ipl-logo

Capital Punishment Satire

953 Words4 Pages

Soo Hwan Lee
Ms. Hyde
English 11
4 April 2015
Capital Punishment
One of the world’s largest, well-known, generic rule is that murder is wrong. Murder is not by any means morally questionable as it flouts the Universal Human Rights and the Bill of Rights. Capital punishment, which is the ‘legal’ killing of people by the government, also does violate these set of laws. But then, why is it that the world has not yet abolished capital punishment? There are over 20 countries that have legalized capital punishment, or in simple words, 20 countries have been carried away by utmost hypocrisy. These countries need to change as capital punishment may kill innocent people, is not ethical, and there is a better alternative.
Humans are not by any means …show more content…

Jed Rakoff, US Distrit judge in the Southern District of New York mentions, “Innocent persons are convicted of capital crimes… by cutting off the opportunity for exoneration, denies due process and, indeed, is tantamount to foreseeable…” Many capital punishments are processed in a relatively fast manner that does not allow the accused to prove innocent. This violates the Fifth Amendment which rules that accused people should be given a due process of law.
Humans are, indeed, never perfect. We are condemned to always make errors, but when talking about life and death, it is no longer errors, but murder. For a government to concede death penalties to its citizens is the same to murder its own people. It is ironic that citizens that murder citizens are considered criminals but the government murdering its citizens is not considered a crime, but a symbol of justice and …show more content…

No one deserves to die. When the government metes out vengeance disguised as justice, it becomes complicit with killers in devaluing human life and human dignity. In civilized society, we reject the principle of literally doing to criminals what they do to their victims: The penalty for rape cannot be rape, or for arson, the burning down of the arsonist's house. We should not, therefore, punish the murderer with death... Capital punishment is a barbaric remnant of uncivilized society." No fellow human beings are to be judged of being worthy or not for life. The right of life is designated to every single human being and it is not something that the government can take

Show More
Related
486 Words | 2 Pages

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Capital punishment is typically considered as a human way to approach to kill the most wickedness criminals and to discourage others from carrying out intolerable crimes. However, the unrestrained expenses of capital punishment cases have states thinking about whether it's justified regardless of the price tag. The lethal established ailment in the discipline of death is that it treats 'individuals from mankind as nonhumans, as articles to be toyed with and disposed of. It is along these lines conflicting with the essential reason of the Clause that even the most awful criminal remains a person had of normal human respect.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Today in the USA 36 states still use death penalties as punishment for commiting a crime such as murder or kidnapping and torture of a victim Little did people know after committing such crime they’d experience the same torture they put there victim in . China has the highest execution league table in the world alongside

Read More
1841 Words | 8 Pages

Whether a criminal is guilty of committing murder or any other capital offense, they should all be given the same sentence - life in prison. How is it fair to allow them to voluntarily choose the death penalty over prison? Criminals willingly sought to break the law and should endure the lifelong debt they owe not only to society but to the family of the innocent victims whose lives have been taken. As asserted by Robert Johnson, a professor of justice and law, and Sandra Smith, a professor of legal studies, death by incarceration is a more effective and suitable form of punishment than the death penalty (Cromie and Zott 174). Although some might argue that it is unfair to keep a criminal alive, they fail to understand that the freedom they once had is permanently lost.

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

“To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice.” -Desmond Tutu. This quote suggests why sentencing one to death after they have taken the life of another is not solving the problem. At most, it is helping to catalyze the grief and loathing towards those who have made mistakes.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

The death penalty is man’s way of playing God, statistically helps no one, and dehumanizes man. For countless years, authors have been writing of the dangers of “playing god,” take the well-known novel, Frankenstein for example. In this novel, a scientist creates ‘the Adam of his labors’ and ultimately goes mad, because he cannot control what he has done. Likewise, if man continues to play the role of God in deciding who lives and dies, the cost will become so vast we will no longer have control of the world in which we’ve created where sentencing people to their deaths is acceptable. Above all, God himself says “thou shall not kill,” thus, if one is to play the role of God, should

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

In recent years, anti-death penalty propagandists have succeeded in stoking the fear that capital punishment is being carelessly meted out. Ironically, Of the 875 prisoners executed in the United States in modern times, not one has been retroactively proved innocent. The benefits of a legal system in which judges and juries have the option of sentencing the cruelest or coldest murderers to death far outweigh the potential risk of executing an innocent person. First and foremost, the death penalty makes it possible for justice to be done to those who commit the worst of all crimes. The execution of a murderer sends a powerful moral message: that the innocent life he took was so precious, and the crime he committed so horrific, that he forfeits

Read More
1575 Words | 7 Pages

Capital Punishment is considered one of the most controversial sentences across the world and has been used as punishment for many centuries. However, as society has evolved the international community has found that it is a violation of human rights and hence created the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976. Under Article 6.1 it states, “Every human being has the inherent right to life.” and under Article 6.2 it states, “In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law.”

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

There are numerous ways to punish people who are a threat to society without executing them. No matter which way the death penalty is carried out, be it lethal injection, lethal gas, electrocution, hanging, or firing squad, the executioner is always implicated. Bryan Stevenson, a social justice activist, questions, “If it’s not right to torture someone for torture, abuse someone for abuse, rape someone for rape, then how can we think we can kill someone for killing?” (“Delaney” 1). Although executioners are permitted to kill, they are still killing another human being.

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the media lately, a majority of the reports are about government brutality, especially against people of minority groups, and convictions of murder cases. The death penalty is defined as punishment of execution, but the death penalty is more than a punishment, it is legalized killing. No matter where a person stands on the death penalty, one statement that people cannot make is that killing is always right. The death penalty is inhumane and should be abolished because it discriminates against human beings and oppresses the lives of the challenged, specifically those with mental illnesses. The government claims that everyone is equal, when in reality stereotypes and discrimination always are present.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Rising in popularity, the Death Penalty has remained a hotly debated, controversial topic that is consistently spurring numerous moral and ethical arguments. Seen as a straightforward concept, a black and white situation, the death penalty has clearly divided the world in two divisions. One division holds the belief that it is a threat to human life and dignity, that it should be illegal. While the other supports the legitimacy of the death penalty and believe in the good it can bring. Regardless of the differing views, Dead Man Walking illustrates the doubled sided coin that is the death penalty to assert the value of human life and the toll it takes on an individual.

Read More
1961 Words | 8 Pages

Professor Roger Hood proposes four main objections to the use of capital punishment: (1) Capital punishment violates the fundamental right to life; (2) capital punishment is not a unique deterrent; (3) the administration of the death penalty, even in developed legal systems, is inherently and irredeemably flawed; and (4) its effect is counter-productive in that it gives out very confused moral messages. (Hodgkinson and Schabas, 2009,

Read More
250 Words | 1 Pages

The process of punishing criminals, who commit crimes against the law, has occurred for centuries. Capital punishment also known as the death penalty is the highest form of punishment the legal system in the United States, can present. The method of Capital punishment in the United States has been in effect for most of the country 's history, without much controversy. However, in today’s society the controversy of whether or not this process is sufficient continues today. Many people throughout America argue this form of punishment to be a hypocritical process, performed by a nation that claims to have liberty and justice for all.

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

Siding with Warrants for Death Around the world today there are only about ten countries that still practice capital punishment (Criminal Justice); none of which appear on the 2017 Top Ten Highest Murder Rate Countries list by the Mesh News. This goes to show that if the heavy decision of if capital punishment should be embraced or not has entered the minds of many; who, most likely have pondered the effects and humanism of such power. To choose a side in the matter, there must be educated facts, expressed opinions, and a knowledge of both sides, pro and con. People who do not truly know about the death penalty will question why it is such an important controversial topic discussed; but to be genuinely knowledge of the topic would allow a

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The risk that innocent people die under death penalty is extremely low due to legal appellations and has succeeded in most of the 58 countries who apply it as a capital crime. Society has a cancer and it’s our duty to eliminate

Read More

More about Capital Punishment Satire

Related Topics

Open Document