However, it does not refer to removal of the property of the lower class as they don’t have sufficient amount of property. He claims that “there is no need to abolish that, the developments of industry have to a great extent already destroyed it, and I still destroying it daily” (Communist Manisfesto). The property of the poor is sake of maintaining them and not comparable to what the bourgeoisie have so there is no point in taking away their properties. It is rather removing properties of the bourgeoisie “bourgeoisie individuality, bourgeoisie independence and bourgeoisie freedom is undoubtedly aimed at. By freedom is meant, under the present bourgeoisie conditions of production, free trade, free selling and buying” (The Communist Manifesto). …show more content…
people in society go to work in companies to work for somebody who has the foresight to open up a company. The idea of capitalism consists of market competition where companies are in constant competition with other competition. They compete to produce more supply resulting in more profit for the company. When companies compete, it results in unequal distribution of income because the bourgeoisie is going to make more than the people who work. Marx’s response to this was that society should be set up in a way where all of the people should mean all of the means of production. All of the people who work for different companies would collectively own the companies instead of just investors getting profit for it. The wealth would be distributed equally amongst all of the people. Businesses work together for the good of all of the people and everybody in the society is supposed to be equal. Anywhere where there is unequal amount of wealth, the government taxes the people who have more income and redistribute it to others in society so that there is no inequality. “The Socialistic bourgeoisie want all the advantages of modern social conditions without struggles and dangers resulting therefrom. They desire the existing start of society, minus its revolutionary and disintegrating elements. They wish for a bourgeoisie without a