After much debate, America finally offered $15 million for the land and France gladly accepted. April 30, 1803 the treaty was written making Louisiana officially American land. Some people however, were upset with the buy. They had believed that the new land would take all the attention and the older eastern land would get forgotten.
He further to response to Princess Elisabeth question by introducing to her what is called (Cartesian Dualism) he uses these to explain to her that the mind, soul and the body are not the same and can never be same, which came to conclude that your mind cannot be your body and your body cannot be your mind. He also explains
“Today’s Demon: Common Scents” Lynda Barry represents that being an individual and not conforming to societies idea of perfection is better than pretending to be someone she is not. “Common Scents” tells of a young girl, N’ako who notices the specific smell in each house; although, she is told her house has a foul smell she states that should prefer that smell because it represents her own identity. The message presented throughout the story is first shown when the young girl notices a distinct smell that is unique to each home she enters, then again when she realizes the lady who sprays air freshener in her home does this to reach an image of perfection, and finally, during a conversation with her grandmother she decides that there was no
The general argument made by Mac Tucker is that the qualification system used in America isn’t up to par with the system used in other countries. More specifically Tucker argues that a better system could be put into place because the one now doesn't work well and Americans actually hate the system currently in use. He writes that many of the high stakes exams taken are set for the students not the teachers. The teachers receive no repercussions because these exams are set for the students and the only ones on the line are them. In this passage Tucker is suggesting that a new system should be put into place so that students and teachers are both able to track their progress and improve their standards.
A quote that supports duality is when Blackmon states “Two Bodies” explores several dualities at one time: the individual and the universe; man and women; reader and speaker; and even the poet and the speaker.” This means when exploring several dualities means that there are several concepts. When they are being compared it doesn’t exactly state that necessarily trying to affect the other. The quote that proves this theory from the poem is “Two bodies face to face/ are at times two stones/ and night a desert.” (4-6)
Philosophers are on a constant struggle to determine if free-will is real or an illusion. Joshua Knobe believes we will do a better job addressing philosophical questions if we “can arrive at a better understanding of the way our own minds work” and free-will is a very important part of our brain, if it were to exist (Experiments in Philosophy, Pg.3). Some philosophers may argue that if free will is an illusion “you couldn’t come up with a philosophical stance on […] new information and act on it, because that implies choice and choice is a product of free will” (If scientists unequivocally proved free will was an illusion, how would society change, if at all?, Pg. 1). So to my wonder, would there be philosophical thinking without free will?
Rachel and J. Gay-WIlliams have opposing ethical positions regarding physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. Rachel backs his ethical approval of euthanasia with two strong arguments. His first argument is the “Utilitarian version of the argument” (Rachels, RIght Thing To Do, 350). This basic claim is that “any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the world or to decrease the amount of misery” (Rachels, RTD, 350). Since those who would be euthanized would become relieved of their unpreventable and agonizing pain (i.e. misery) euthanasia would be morally right.
Summary and Response to “The Lonely” In Season 1 episode 7 of The Twilight Zone entitled “The Lonely”, the main character, James A. Corry, was featured as exiled in a faraway place, nine million miles away from the Earth (Smight, 1959). Corry was described as a criminal whose punishment is to be exiled in a solitary confinement context without the privilege for human contact, except for the member of the supplies ship that regularly brings Corry supplies. As appropriate to the title of the episode, Corry was termed as the loneliest person in the entire universe. When the captain of the supplies ship arrived, Allenby, he pitied the lonely situation of Corry and brought with him a robot, Alicia, to keep Corry company.
Saint Anselm is known as one of the most important Christian philosophers of his time and still today. He is best known for his ontological argument regarding God’s existence and is consistently referenced for his work regarding the nature of God, redemption, freedom, and sin. Anselm believes God to be something “…that which nothing greater can be conceived” (Anselm, 40). He finds support and uses personal and commonsense logic to support his main ideas. His argument is broken up into several topics that reference the concept of just considering the idea of God, His true existence, considering the impossibility of God’s nonexistence, and a few others.
The Eye of Minds is a futuristic novel written by James Dashner that focuses on the concept of a virtual world called the VirtNet. The two types of characters in this novel are humans, and Tangents, which are programs made by humans so they’re basically artificial intelligence. Humans (also known as gamers) have access to the VirtNet from their Coffins which is a device. Furthermore, Michael is a teenage protagonist who assists Agent Weber with locating Kaine (who has a reputation for being dangerous and ferocious), and the Mortality Doctrine. After reading the novel The Eyes of Minds, I have confidence that it can fascinate other students enough for them to read it.
Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.
PH2211 In this essay, I will first break down Anselm’s ontological argument with a powerful criticism, and then defend Anselm’s position. Following that, I will analyze both positions critically and provide my own stand regarding Anselm’s argument. The problem with Anselm’s ontological argument provided by Rowe in his book is the problem of definition.
Descartes was a substance or cartesian dualist who therefor believed the mind and body to be two separate independent things that can survive on their own but are linked. Descartes arrived at this conclusion by hyperbolic doubt which lead to his famous truth ‘i think therefor i am’ as he realised the only thing he could not doubt was his own consciousness, and decided that his thinking self is a product of his mind and must be separate from the body because it cannot be doubted like the body can. Descartes problem of explaining how nonphysical mind and body interact is saved by 20th century interactionism suggesting that the mind supervenes on a properly functioning brain. However if this idea of consciousness being on top of the brain where
The ideas of dualism have drastic impacts on historical and contemporary philosophy, many of those effects in my view are negative. It would take far more time than I have available to express the totality of my disagreements with dualism so for now, I will focus on dualism and ethics, more specifically, ethics in relation to free will. As must always come before a proper argument definitions are in order. For the purposes of this paper I will be using the term “Dualism” to refer to “the idea that the mind is separate and distinct from the physical body yet maintains at least a unidirectional transfer of information” While there may be some dualists who would take issue with this definition (for example some proponents of epiphenomenalism who believe the mind is separate from the body but that it has no
The Modal Ontological Argument by Alvin Plantinga uses modal logic using possibility and necessity to show that it is rational to believe in God. However, the argument is not a proof of the existence of a being who is a maximally great being as it’s not to prove or establish a conclusion but for it to be rational to accept the central premise and the conclusion (Oppy, Graham, "Ontological Arguments"). Premise one says it is possible that God exists. Possible, meaning he is Metaphysically possible as there are other reasons for Gods possibility than strictly logical and being that the Ontological argument is Metaphysical.
