ipl-logo

Case Brief Wal-Mart Stores Vs Cockrell

597 Words3 Pages

Walmart Stores v. Cockrell Fact: In November 1996, Appellee Karl Cockrell and his parents worked at Wal-Mart stores in Texas. When Karl left the store, Raymond Navarro, a Wal-Mart a loss-prevention officer, took him into custody. In his office, Navarro and two other Wal-Mart employees asked Cockrell to remove his pants. Cockrell complied, and did not reveal the stolen goods. Then Navarro asked Cockrell to take off his shirt, but he had a large bandage strapped to his abdomen. Cockrell explained to Navarro that the bandage was designed to protect the sterile area after the operation, but Navarro insisted that Cockrell remove the bandage. Cockrell acquiesced. When no contraband was found, Navarro released Cockrell. Cockrell then sued Wal-Mart …show more content…

In this case, does Wal-Mart morally deny responsibility? Rule: According to Cheeseman (2015, p.87), “Almost all states have enacted merchant protection statues, also known as the shopkeeper’s privilege. These statutes allow merchants to stop, detain, and investigate suspected shoplifter without held liable for false imprisonment if: 1. There are reasonable grounds for the suspicion. 2. Suspects are detained for only a reasonable time. 3. Investigations are conducted in a reasonable manner. Analysis: There are no reasonable grounds for doubt. Navarro's conclusion is purely based on observations of Karl Cockrell. He should first surveillance video by observing the Cockrell. When deciding whether to survey and investigation is not in a reasonable manner, because Navarro is deprived of the identity of the man, and asked him to remove abdominal bandage, in the case of the removed the bandage, is must require a medical staff was present. Wal-Mart does not comply with the requirements of the merchant protection statute. Conclusion: Navarro did not take responsible action because there was no logical reason。In fact, Wal-Mart’s behavior has not been met because of its unethical behavior.

Show More
Related
344 Words | 2 Pages

On 10-03-2015 at 2018 hours I responded to 599 Pine (Casey 's) in reference to counterfeit bills. Upon arriving I made contact with Store Manager Laura Isaac and Officer Woodruff. While Isaac was pulling up surveillance footage she explained that a female had attempted to pay for gas and other items with a counterfeit twenty dollar bill. I seized the note, it has been entered into evidence as #18596. Isaac also explained that the female arrived in a vehicle which she described as a grey short cab dodge truck.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

On July 29, 2003 Detective Jason Leavitt was a part of a decoy operation with an undercover arrest team ; he was dressed on black jeans, a dirty short- sleeved flannel shirt on top of a dirty-t shirt, and a baseball cap to apart as a drunk homeless man . Detective Leavitt carried Twenty one-dollar bills in his breast pocket, to attract a thief. Leavitt was on the block of 200 Main St across from the Greyhound station. The Appellant Richard Miller approached Detective Leavitt on this very street to ask him for money. Detective Leavitt told Miller he was not going to give him an money, Leavitt testified that the appellant put his arm around him and asked him to go get a drink.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) Capsule Summary: Seizing a person’s luggage for an extended period until a warrant is obtained violates the Fourth Amendment as beyond the limits of a Terry stop, but, a sniff by a narcotics dog does not constitute a search for Fourth Amendment purposes. Facts: The respondent Raymond Place was stopped by Federal Agents (DEA) upon his arrival into LaGuardia Airport on a Friday afternoon. The respondent refused to consent to the search of his luggage. His luggage was seized by the agents under suspicion they contained narcotics. The respondent was informed the agents would be obtaining a search warrant from a judge.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

Case Brief: Maryland v. Pringle Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366, 124 S. Ct. 795 (2003) Facts: In Baltimore County, a car was stopped by a police officer for speeding in the early morning hour. The car was occupied by three men identified as Donte Partlow (driver/owner), Joseph Pringle (respondent/front-seat passenger), and Otis Smith (back-seat passenger). When the officer asked Partlow for his registration, he opened the glove compartment where the officer observed a large roll of money inside the compartment, later confirmed as $763. The officer asked Partlow for consent to search the vehicle, which he consented.

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

One of the first Supreme Court Cases that have happened to obtained Women’s Rights was in 1971. In 1971, there was a Supreme Court Cases called Phillips V. Martin Marietta Corporation. In of this court case Phillips tried to apply for a job of being of a preschool teacher and was denied. Phillips wasn’t the only one who applied and didn’t receive the job, since 80% of the applicants were denied because the were all women. So, once has just Phillips found out that she was denied from a job, just by her gender she took it the authorities to show them what Martin Marietta Corp. was doing.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

Gatzke worked at Walgreen Company as a district manager. He was called to temporarily relocate to Duluth, Minnesota to supervise the opening and preliminary operations of a Walgreen-owned restaurant. The company was paying for Gatzke to live at an Edgewater Motel, where he set up a temporary workspace. Gatzke and some employees had dinner at the new restaurant and then continued their night to a bar for several drinks while discussing the restaurant. Gatzke went back to his room at the Edgewater motel and began to fill out an expense report.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

10 Investigative Skills (7PA0006337) - Officer Stark responded to a PC211-Robbery radio call at 1038 E. Colorado Blvd. The comments of the call stated 2 Female Asians and 2 Male Asians pushed the Victim out of his wheelchair and took his wallet containing $25. Stark responded to the location, even though it was out of his beat, and asked me if he could handle the call. I advised the beat Officer that we would handle the incident for training. As we entered the Rite Aid, the Victim was sitting in his wheelchair directly in front of the exit.

Read More
1438 Words | 6 Pages

Walgreens most likely relied on their security contractor to ensure the required training for all security officers. Living in such a letegious society, blame for this event was pointed in several directions. To make the statement that Walgreens was responsible for the murder of Santiago, simply because they elected to have an armed guard on duty is oversimplifying the situation and not placing blame where it really belongs. A motivated murderer on PCP decided to kill an officer to gain notoriety. Unfortunately, he was successful in his goal.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

DISCUSSION The facts are as follows with regards to our client Sam Mara’s alleged conspiracy case. Mr. Mara has hired us to find out the strength of the charge against him regarding the events of July 16, 2017. Mara was arrested for allegedly engaging in organized criminal activity by allegedly conspiring to commit a felony robbery of a store in the Houston Galleria. The robbery was never completed.

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

In the essay titled “Labouring the Walmart Way”, author Deenu Parmar explains the unhealthy effects of Walmart, how to stop them, and the challenges of doing so. Parmar begins by detailing how Walmart has done little for local economies. By hiring financially vulnerable people, the franchise insures that no one would dare to unionize; thus ensuring employees will only earn the bare minimum, and thus out-competing local competition. Parmar also goes on to explain how a local community removed Walmart. They were able to do this through the use of fierce union protests that made the store unprofitable.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Part 2 Occupiers' liability in Australia The defendant in this case , Xerox Supermarket , has an very important role which is identified by the Australia law as an occupier. Hence , I will try to refer to the occupiers' liability law and relative regulation ,especially from the passed legislation of Western Australia , South Australia and Victoria . Actually , the occupiers' liability law still obeys the general principles of negligence like standard of care and proper criterion . However , it can provide the judger a more practical and accurate view on the possible liability of the supermarket as a typical premise of retailers .

Read More
1452 Words | 6 Pages

There’s a better and safer alternative to handle that situation for catching an employee stealing clothes from the company. The employee could have told the manager or the boss what was happening. Lawfully, the murderer was sentenced for life in prison without parole. Critics have sometimes charged Lululemon with having an unethical corporate culture promoting competition over collaboration (pg. 512).

Read More
1637 Words | 7 Pages

Walmart was founded in the summer of 1962 by Kingfisher, Oklahoma native Sam Walton. Although Walton’s original vision for the store was relatively modest, the half century since its founding has seen Walmart morph into one of the biggest companies in the world. Today headed by one Doug McMillon, Walmart boasts more than 5000 stores in the United States of America alone and employs more than 1.5 million people. Walmart is undoubtedly an American institution, yet each Walmart store feels like its own little country. Walmart seems to have its own laws and customs and the people who shop their on a regular basis appear almost primitive in their behavior as they go about raiding the store’s shelves and wrestling with fellow customers for discount flat screen televisions and bulk packages of two-ply toilet paper.

Read More
201 Words | 1 Pages

it was evident that fewer than 10 percent of people try to run away when caught shoplifting. If they do run, there is a strict “no chase” policy. However, they do follow from safe distance to observe and relay that information to police dispatch. The police works closely with cases of shoplifting at the store and the response time is quick, which means 75% of shoplifters who run from the crime are caught. While the ones, who do not end up being caught, come back and are caught later.

Read More
1156 Words | 5 Pages

• There are many cases that have been recognized as armed robberies and for that the store chain should look upon it’s security. • Contradiction of interests between PBM segments and retail pharmacy. • Sales major focus is on lower margins on products. Walgreen: •

Read More

More about Case Brief Wal-Mart Stores Vs Cockrell

Related Topics

Open Document