1.Burlarley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Procedural History Michael Burlarley and his wife were looking at from the Kingston Wal-Mart when the cashier beginning ringing up the things at unbelievably high costs as a joke. The clerk additionally tossed things at Burlarley. He was not interested and advised her to stop. She did at initially, yet then she tossed a pack containing shoes and cleanser, smacking Burlarley in the face. He sued Wal-Mart, which moved to reject the objection in light of the fact that the cashier was not "acting inside of the extent of her job." Facts The doctrine can be vicariously at risk for the tortious demonstrations of its representatives just if those demonstrations were submitted in facilitation of the's business