The following essay will outline the variances of two case” Illinois v. Gates and Spinelli v. United States. It will discuss the Supreme Court requires to establish probable cause for a warrant. Illinois v. Gates In Illinois v. Gates, law enforcement received a letter (that was anonymous) stating that the Gate family was in the drug transporting business, and operating between the states of Florida and Illinois. Upon investigation, law enforcement discovered that Gates had made the purchase of an Air Line ticket, traveling to Florida.
There are many women that have contributed in making the world a better place, but the one that I think stands out is Dolores Huerta. She is an idol because of her living style and utmost propriety behavior impacted the lives of many, especially Mexican women. Her life was fulfilled with morality, dedication, and equality. Dolores Huerta was the second child born to Juan and Alicia (Chavez) Fernandez on April 10, 1930, at Dawson, New Mexico. North of Dawson, Dolores lived a submissive life in a small mining town near the mountains.
The Top Five Canada (Justice) v. Khadr Do you think the charter should always apply to the activities of the Canadian government officials exercising functions outside Canada? I concur with the Federal court's findings in that, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were created to protect the rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens in Canada. Outside of Canada, citizens are protected by international laws between sovereign states. Therefore, crimes committed in other judicial sanctions should be dealt with by their own court of law, without interference of other countries sovereignty. The case of R. v. Cook is an exception; Canadian authorities interrogated Cook, a Canadian citizen, outside of Canada.
My second nominee is; Nellie Mcclung. "She was spirited, she was amazing, she was effective," afew commonly used words to describe Nellie McClung. She was a female activist, One of Nellie 's best influences was her mom. Her family 's influence was not a doubt the reason she became an activist. Her mom thought that every child had the right to an education, and her hole family encouraged her to learn all she could.
On April 22, 2021, it was decided that judges now have the power to sentence youth to life imprisonment without parole. Toward the case of Brett Jones guilty of killing his grandfather at the age of 15, Jones V. Mississippi was overthrown. Succeeding the majority of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in a 6-3 ruling, Kavanaugh claimed that judges should be able to sentence youth to life imprisonment without parole as it should be up to the judges’ discretion. Opposing this Justice Sonia Sotomayor believes that children should have the right to parole and strongly believes judges should still have to prove teens cannot be rehabilitated to sentence one to life in prison. Corresponding to Sotomayor, youth should have the right to parole and judges should
O’Connor voted against discrimination and followed the Constitution very closely. She was recognized as one who gave more opportunities to women. One source puts it well: “Although her decisions have not always been popular with women's rights activists, O'Connor still is considered to be a role model for women” (“O’Connor, Sandra Day”). As a result of all her work, O’Connor is remembered and loved by many as the first woman on Supreme Court. Without the work of Sandra Day O’Connor, it is probable that women would not have the same opportunities on Supreme Court as they do
Burwell, Obamacare, and Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex marriage. In King v. Burwell, Sotomayor was recognized as an influential voice, having opposed the arguments that opposed the law. In Obergefell v. Hodges, Sotomayor joined the other justices in passing the same-sex marriage act nationally. I believe because of Sotomayor’s background, being a minority and growing up in Bronx New York, has made her to be a voice for those who are afraid to be heard. America is a melting pot of many cultures and nationalities, our government should reflect the
The nation has significantly improved throughout history, in the years 1857-1954, three main supreme court cases had changed the perspectives of others by giving them a different view of things. Civil liberties, mostly deal with regard to freedom of action and speech which hasn’t always been fair to African-Americans, in history, they have been treated unfairly just due to the color of their skin. They have been segregated primarily throughout history, not having the equal about of civil rights as White-American people. However, the supreme court cases of Dred Scott v. Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Brown v. Board affected the role of African-Americans and how they weren’t able to own land, sit wherever they would like to sit on a railway
Justice Sonia Sotomayor was born on June 25th 1954 in the South Bronx area of New York to parents Juan and Celina Baez Sotomayor. Her parents who were of Puerto Rican descent moved their family to New York for a better opportunity for their children. Her parents worked hard to make a living her mother was a nurse a methadone clinic and her father worked with his hands and the family lived modestly within their means. Justice Sotomayor was diagnosed with type one diabetes at the age of seven and began taking insulin shot’s, shortly after her father died in 1963 when she was nine, leaving her mother as a single parent, during her upbringing her mother Celina placed a huge emphasis on the importance of education, pushing her children to become
Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas is a justice who 's philosophy on law has created judicial restraint due to his past and being voted in by the most narrow margin in United States history. If Judge Thomas attempted to create judicial activism and question the current laws in place it could potentially start of landslide of problems internally with other Justices and with the public. With only one year of experience prior to his appointment and replacement of Judge Thurgood Marshall, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas must be as conservative as possible so that he does not draw unwanted attention to him self.
The way she uses her tone, and her words will be remembered for along time. She is inspirational, passionate, caring, and she cares for people's well being. They could be white, black, asian, or hispanic and she would want equal rights for everyone. Freedom is a right not a privilege, use freedom
Negative stereotypes are damaging because it fits minority groups in a box and deceives people that roles are predetermined and absolute. Negative stereotypes work in two ways. First, it works according to language. There are the words and phrases used to perpetuate negative stereotype, but then, as we can see in the museum’s collection, there is the infiltration of material culture, objects bought and sold, that further communicated anti-black slogans. In effect, what we can see by looking at these images is a mass economy dedicated to keeping alive a very dangerous myth.
“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.
Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.
Why Rosa Parks? Simple, she knew what was right and wasn't fearful. Many people know of her story and her brave actions and the impact is has on this country, but I will forever be grateful for her example of determination and courage. She sat in that seat on that bus with fear, but with a fearless spirit. Although she was arrested for her act of civil disobedience, she did it peacefully.
