ipl-logo

Causes And Effects Of The Crittenden Compromise

686 Words3 Pages

Joseph Montesino
Abraham Lincoln won the presidential election on November 6, 1860 without the support of a single southern state. Abraham Lincoln proposes banning slavery in all the American territories to stop it spreading. The Crittenden Compromise was proposed as a constitutional amendment by Kentucky Senator John J. Crittenden on December 18th, 1860 to assured the continuation of slavery in states where it already existed, in hope of preventing the First State to secede from the Union. Two days before Abraham Lincoln’s inauguration, the Crittenden Compromise failed and was rejected.
On December 20th 1860, South Carolina held a secession convention in Charleston and its Representatives voted in agreement, 169 to 0, therefore it became the First State to Secede from the Union with desire to protect their state rights and defend the intuition of slavery, in which they believed was essential to their economy. Its capital would be Montgomery, Alabama. March 2nd, 1861, The Corwin Amendment was proposed in Congress by New York Senator William Seward as a simpler solution than the lengthy Crittenden Compromise. It was a short amendment the Constitution as another desperate compromise to appease the south, protecting slavery in existing slave-states. The Corwin Amendment was passed by Congress and …show more content…

The slave south could have accepted the fair election of Abraham Lincoln, and exclusion of slavery from territories; which would never happen since the south believed their economy was based on slaves growing cotton and slave trading. The Free states could have accepted slave codes for the territories plus the other measures demanded for the protection and expansion of slavery, which would never happen since Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation beginning of 1863, freeing slaves in the states of the Confederacy that had seceded from the United

Show More
Related
68 Words | 1 Pages

The significance of President Lincoln’s election was that the South took it as an indication that there was to be no compromise. The Emancipation Proclamation freed no slaves, as it only freed slaves in states in rebellion. The Emancipation Proclamation was effective January 1, 1863. Lincoln intended to eliminate or restrict slavery, believed the Southern states and this was one of the causes of the American Civil

Read More
377 Words | 2 Pages

During Abraham Lincoln’s presidency at the start of the 1860, an issue that had divided the nation was slavery. Lincoln’s election to presidency as a republic was not received well by the Southern slave states, as they thought that as a republican he was out to abolish slavery. In an effort to calm southern states and keep them from seceding from the United States, he attempts to ease them with his First Inaugural Address. In his First Inaugural Address his key points are to clam southern leaders of slave states, keep the states from seceding, and make them at ease as he enters presidency.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Abraham Lincoln’s vs Andrew Johnson’s Reconstruction Plan Lincoln shared the uncommon belief that the confederate states could still be part of the union and that the cause of the rebellion was only a few within the states which lead him to begin the reconstruction in December of 1863. This resulted in plans with lenient guidelines and although they were challenged by Wade-Davis Bill, Lincoln still rejected his ideas and kept his policies in place. Lincoln also allowed land to be given the newly freed slave or homeless white by distributing the land that had been confiscated from former land owners however this fell through once Johnson took office. After Lincoln’s death when Johnson was elected many things started to turn away from giving blacks equal rights and resulted in many things such a black codes which kept newly freed slaves from having the same rights as whites. When Lincoln first acted after the civil war, he offered policies that would allow the confederate slaves to become part of the union again and would allow a pardon for those states.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Stephen Douglas, an advocate of popular sovereignty, and Abraham Lincoln, a Republican candidate, were both running to represent Illinois in the United States Senate. These two men met in a sequence of seven debates before they battled for office of presidency in the election of 1858. Slavery eventually became the main issue discussed repeatedly in each of the debates, due to the Mexican War adding new territories left to be assessed as free soil or not. During this time, the Compromise of 1850 was a temporary fix to the sectional issues for the states that made the decision to participate in the extension of slavery. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1854 brought the issue back up again.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

As stated in Document 5, “Many Southerners favored secession as part of the idea that the states have rights and powers which the federal government cannot legally deny. The supporters of states’ rights held that the national government was a league of independent states, any of which had the right to secede”. This shows how Southerners believed that they had every right to secede. They wanted to ensure that they lived in a country in which they would be free to live the way they wanted to. The federal government was unable to prevent this, since each state has inalienable rights and powers.

Read More
1243 Words | 5 Pages

Following this event some states would go on to pass a law to block the federal government from enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act. The North and South would become more divided than ever before. (Norton, 2015) When Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1860 many in the country were deeply divided on the issue of slavery. The North was against it while the South was for it.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

And what would we do with the freed slaves? This became big problems that was during the time of reconstruction. I believed that the South killed reconstruction because of violence promoted towards blacks in the South by the Ku Klux Klan. The south wanted to end all reconstruction effort.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The Reconstruction Era in the U.S. was from 1865-1877, and the Civil war in 1865 gave million of slaves their freedom, but the process of rebuilding the south durning this time introduced many challenges. Reconstruction was a period of time in America that was difficult for the African American slaves and one of the most critical periods in American History. Like all things in life, Reconstruction did come to an end, the conclusion has been labeled both a victory and a loss. Abraham Lincoln started his plan for the reconstruction of the South during the Civil War. He arranged the Ten-Percent Plan for Reconstruction in 1863.

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

The Emancipation Proclamation stated that any slaves in Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia would be free. The slaves in these border states: Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri would not be free since they were already a part of the Union. It only applied to the states in the rebellion. Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not completely abolish slavery, it led to

Read More
1198 Words | 5 Pages

The institution of slavery was a vital part of the growth, economy, and politics in the United States from the early colonial era to the climax of the Civil War. The end of slavery came in a tide of reform resulting in the liberation of over four million slaves. The confluence of the political developments in 1861 and the changing ideological currents brought on by the Civil War impacted the United States for many years to come and brought slavery to an end. On March 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln was elected the 16th president of the United States. He was the first Republican candidate to win the presidency with only forty percent of the popular vote.

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

The citizens of the U.S. would not have equal rights, and terrorist organizations could be pardoned from jail. Government life and leadership would be different if the south won the civil

Read More

More about Causes And Effects Of The Crittenden Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document