ipl-logo

Causes Of The Monroe Doctrine

299 Words2 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine of December 2, 1823, was indeed crucial for American foreign policy. In fact, it was a motivational and inspirational speech as a part of the annual presidential’s message to the Congress. The occasion for the doctrine was the vision of expanding America during James Monroe’s presidency. Even though the doctrine took Monroe’s name, it was in reality drifted by John Quince Adams (Monroe’s secretary of state) because he feared that Spain would try to regain the Latin American colonies which had just gained their independency. Latin America was a major market for British goods, and Adams wished for the United States to take Britain’s role. Obviously, he wanted Europe out of the picture. Additionally, Russia was posing a threat with the possible colonization of Alaska. …show more content…

America was not to be considered for future colonization by Europe, because it was the land of the free. The speech was meant to cast light on the independent condition of the United States. For this reason, American was not going to take part in any European war. Only in the event in which the United States were to be threatened and put in danger, a war could be considered in order to protect America’s rights, peace and safety. In addition, the events in Spain and Portugal had shown the instability of the European system, and Monroe didn’t want anything to do with Europe internal matters.
The Monroe Doctrine relates to the revolutionary and early republic period because it focuses on the matter of independence, just like the Declaration of Independence. That is why it was also called America’s diplomatic declaration of

Show More
Related
78 Words | 1 Pages

The embargo act took place in 1807. the embargo act was attempted by Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson hoped it would not cause a war between the British and the U.S. they did it because the y wanted to get back the British for interfering with the trade. they block american ships from using British ports and the was a problem for american trades he did try to prevent a war but the embargo act cause a war in 1812

Read More
111 Words | 1 Pages

In 1819, John Quincy Adams asserted that the United States had prerogative to all of North America. He thought it was America’s destiny to expand to the Pacific Ocean. Many Americans had agreed with him by the 1840s. The Manifest Destiny had an important role in the Election of 1844. The Democrats had chosen James K. Polk for President, a man who wasn’t really known, while the Whigs chose Henry Clay for President.

Read More
79 Words | 1 Pages

At first the Latin American nations saw this as favorable, because they saw that the U.S. could not do anything alone if moving along without the backing of Britain. The military and political power allowed the Monroe Doctrine to be brought about. This doctrine had combined with much of the ideas of Manifest Destiny. Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary was a great extension of this doctrine, it upturned the original meaning and justified independent intervention of the U.S. in Latin America.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Nostra heard about the Monroe Doctrine and had some idea to change it up. Ithad no more of it to be used solely for economic dominance and imperialism by the United States, but in conjunction with its twenty neighbors, to defend the collective security of the Western Hemisphere. But changing the Monroe Doctrine only changed some of its power. Still, the Monroe Doctrine could still have advance American economic and political interests in the Western

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

These conflicts affected the 1807 Embargo Act, as Jefferson listened to Napoleon's ideals and created more disagreement between him and Americans (Doc 4). His closing of the ports created disadvantages for America, and after the contention of the negotiation of terrorists, the federalist ideals were becoming more and more popular. This contention was somewhat resolved by James Monroe's speech in 1823, as he stated where America was compared to other countries. “It is still the true policy of the United States to leave the parties to themselves, in the hope that other powers will pursue the same course” (Doc 7). His belief of isolating America from European countries, helps support the claims of non negotiation as well as creating a more

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

Thesis Both Nationalism and Sectionalism developed concurrently during the Era of Good Feelings. The two main reasons why nationalism increased was because of Henry Clay’s American System and Monroe’s policy to increase nationalism. Clay’s AS created a better national infrastructure that tightened America together. Monroe’s policy was to promote national unity and America’s power, which strengthens nationalism.

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

It is very easy to take out country and or freedom for granted. For those of use that have always lived here and never seen anything different it is almost impossible to to fully realize how good we really have it. We were not given anything we have today however, it took an extreme amount of hard work and dedication by the leaders of our past. It is impossible to discuss how this country achieved what we have now today without talking about George Washington. Our first presidents, the man who really pulled our country together and helped lay the ground work that we still live by today.

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

First, Why specifically was America interested in Alaska? America was interested in Alaska from many different angles. There

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

The Louisiana Purchase was originally a part of New France the region has exchanged many times. In 1800s, the region was ruled by Spain but was also the home of many American merchants and even farmers. New Orleans was a key port to the region and was also important in taking role or the outlet of American farming goods produced by farms in Ohio River Valley. President Thomas Jefferson sent Robert Livingston and James Monroe to France to inquire about purchase of New Orleans for the United States in order to secure a permanent port on the Mississippi River. Napoleon found an opportunity to finance on-going conflicts in Europe and to keep away the British from expanding in North America, so they agreed to sell the United States the entire region for $15 million, doubling the size of the United States.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was the Idea of the fifth president Of the United states James Monroe. It was passed on December 2, 1823, in the 7th annual message to congress. The policy was designed to show the separation of the New World from Europe. The Monroe doctrine stated that the Western Hemisphere could no longer be colonized by European countries and they were independent. It also stated that the United States will not interfere in any business of the Europeans or its European colonies.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

American history is full of events that have changed the curse of its history, some more recent than others, an often overviewed war or conflict is the Mexican war, probably because it was only 13 years before of one of the most bloodshed periods and important periods of this country 's history, the Civil War; the Mexican War might have nit had as big as an impact as that of the Civil War, but nonetheless it was a period that is certainly important, we can also think that no war is ever unimportant (Shaara,10). Since the Louisiana purchase, there was a fervor for expansion among the American people, in 1845 the then independent nation of Texas was annexed by the United states (Shaara, 12). But there were several doubts about what was the real

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was a speech given in 1823 by James Monroe, the 5th president of the United States, to the U.S. Congress concerning European presence in the Western Hemisphere. Monroe was becoming continuously concerned about European influence in the region. While the primary audience for this message was Congress, the intended audience was all European powers, including Russia, and Latin America. The events in Latin America before and after the Spanish-American War will be used as an example of the imperial reach by the U.S. The United States, ironically, became an imperial power through its mission outlined in the Monroe Doctrine to end European colonialism and imperialism.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine and the ideology of Manifest Destiny played a significant role in the U.S. policy towards Latin America and the Caribbean in the nineteenth century to the early twentieth century through Imperialism. The Monroe Doctrine and the Manifest Destiny was the byproduct of the Imperialistic system. Imperialism aimed to control over a territory, population, and resources to gain economic benefits and to gain political strength through military tactics. The Monroe doctrine and the Manifest Destiny was an oxymoron with American democratic values. The Monroe doctrine and the Manifest Destiny greatly influenced the outcome of the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War and the Panama Canal with the backing of American corporations.

Read More
568 Words | 3 Pages

As stated before, the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because of three reasons, Americans were killed, Texas was already annexed, and Manifest Destiny allows it. The United states had many superb reasons for going to war with Mexico. This essay is significant because it helps explain the United States’ choice to go to war with

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the play Hamlet, most readers would assume that Hamlet doesn’t love Ophelia. What I have gathered and Hamlet’s actions and words proves that he still cares and loves Ophelia. Hamlet claims that he doesn’t love Ophelia. From what I've read,Hamlet tries to mislead Ophelia’s spies by becoming harsh towards her. He wanted her to leave Denmark so that she would be protected.

Read More

More about Causes Of The Monroe Doctrine

Related Topics

Open Document