ipl-logo

Causes Of World War 1 Dbq

1045 Words5 Pages

Connor Larson & Lucas Turnis
Mrs. Ross
AP European History
25 April 2023
Causes of World War I Prior to World War I, a power struggle between the Ottoman Empire and Russia spiraled into involving Britain and France: the Crimean War. The conditions set for a major shift in power caused by Italian and German unification. This unification brought many new leaders of great power such as Victor Emmanuel II and Otto Von Bismarck. With newfound land, power, and wealth, Bismarck felt invincible and began to seek war and form alliances. Working through alliances, Germany created the Schlieffen plan which had the intention of invading France while Russia tried to slowly militarize its massive country. As a result of the assassination of Arch-Duke Ferdinand, …show more content…

Overall, militaristic spending among the main countries in Europe contributed greatly to the power imbalances. There was a major increase in spending but the most prominent change occurred in Germany with nearly a four hundred million dollar increase and Russia’s three hundred million dollar increase (Doc. 1). This shows the commonality of increased military spending among many of the prominent European countries and the war preparation that took place using concepts like militarization and mobilization, especially in Russia where political power shifted to the military. Additionally, an American historian by the name of Sidney Bradshaw Fay shared his unbiased view on the War. He assigned blame to every state saying that their leaders either did things that led to army mobilization for war or did not take preventive measures to stop the European friction (Doc. 6). This demonstrates how every country was liable for the outbreak in one way or another. While growing advancements in technology and strong landed armies posed a threat to defending countries, naval forces proved to be just as intimidating. Similarly, Germany’s navy terrorized England and even pushed them to ally with France for protection (Doc. 7). This shows that the use of militarism and intimidation proved to further agitate relationships, especially that of …show more content…

In the 1840s, nationalistic tensions were high and Slavs were beginning to desire their own state. These aspirations led to the meeting of the Slavic Conference in Prague, in which Slavic people want to be freed and form their own state; however, this put pressure on the Ottoman Empire, Austria, and Russia (pg. 675). This increased Slavic tensions provoked war between these major powers which became one step that led towards an even larger war: World War I. This directly occurred due to a later conspiracy created by Pan-Slavists in the hope of a Greater Serbia, which came to be known as the Black Hand. This conspiracy assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and became an incident in the East and caused Russia’s and Austria’s advancing contradictory claims (doc. 7). This shows the influence of a single radical Pan-Slavic group that called for a Greater Serbia, and was inspired by the Slavic Berlin Conference. Not too long before the Black Hand arguments broke out among Serbia and Austria-Hungary. The Austria-Hungarian government accused the Royal Serbian government of tolerating and glorifying anti-monarchial and anti-Austria Hungary propaganda (doc. 3). This shows a sense of nationalism of the Serbian people who united under common ideas and a single, non-restricting

Show More
Related
525 Words | 3 Pages

Not only did was this a threat to everyone, but military leaders began to gain more power in the say of politics. (25-1b, Spielvogel) This actually ended up pushing political leaders to make decisions based on militant reasons for the fear that if they did not they would create mass chaos within their armies. (25-1b, Spielvogel) This was evident in the crisis of the summer if 1914 where many saw the dangers in the combination of the Serbians wanting their own nation and the Russian opposition to Austria.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

To avoid acting as the “anvil or “bondsmen” of the European continent, they must take militant actions. To prove this notion, Document D, alludes to Frederick the Great, who lead the Prussian empire into several battles and was deemed victorious in every one of his battles. He did not necessarily have to go to war, but he did so and obtained many advantages. General Friedrich von

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

It was also the Black Hand as well as the Slavic people who wanted their own country for their people, as they believed they were superior to all. They did not like Austria-Hungary so they went after their leader. The Black hand then killed the leader of Austria-Hungary and that set off the alliances in World War 1. Lastly, there were a few different types of alliances before World War 1. The Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Most of Europe started to imperialize and it started to become a race. Each country has over 1 million colonies, based on Document F. In Document B the countries are all blaming each other for “breaking the peace”, with Austria and Slovenia pointing their fingers at each other. With each country racing to colonize other countries it became such a big competition, that countries started to fight over the colonies. Each country wanted more and more land, as it contributed to the amount of power they had. The assassination of Austria-Hungary’s Archduke Francis Ferdinand was known to cause the war because there was already an ongoing feud between the Austrians and the Slavic people.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Germany also took rather outrageous measures to defend their fellow ally. As displayed in the chart of per capita expenditures of the Great Powers on armaments, growth of Germany’s military spending far surpassed that of other nations by a whopping 540%, or increasing by almost seven U.S. dollars in the years leading up to the war (Document 1). Such an increase on military spending raised suspicion that war would be initiated among the European powers. As tensions escalated, these excessive actions taken by the Central Powers would transform Serbia’s revolution

Read More
1323 Words | 6 Pages

Militarism is the policy in which a country glorifies its military power by having an army prepared at any time. This militarism also came from nationalism, or extreme patriotism, within countries. According to document C, a graph adapted from The London Times History of The World, shows the amount of money (pounds) that went towards the production of armaments from 1890 to the start of the war (1914). It also shows how the armaments increase among the navy and army within certain countries that were involved in the start of the war. Every country was recorded to have an increase in currency that fueled the production of weaponry.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

“Nevertheless, a European war broke out. Why? Because in each country [of Europe] political and military leaders did certain things which lead to the mobilization [of their armies for war] and [finally] to the declarations of war, or [these leaders] failed to do certain things which might have prevented [the war]. In this sense, all the European countries in greater or lesser degree were responsible [for the outbreak of World War”’ (Document F)

Read More
1110 Words | 5 Pages

While the outbreak of war was probably not inevitable- although many nationalist and military planners believed it to be- it was likely. [Merriman, pg 881] Once two powers seemed on the verge of war, the entangling alliances that pitted the Triple Alliance against the Triple Entente seemed likely to bring all of the European powers into the

Read More
1032 Words | 5 Pages

In the 1840s, nationalistic tensions were high and Slavs were beginning to desire their own state. These aspirations led to the meeting of the Slavic Conference in Prague, in which Slavic people want to be freed and form their own state; however, this put pressure on the Ottoman Empire, Austria, and Russia (pg. 675). This increased Slavic tensions provoked war between these major powers which became one step that led towards an even larger war: World War I. This directly occurred due to a later conspiracy created by Pan-Slavists in the hope of a Greater Serbia, which came to be known as the Black Hand.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

The graph in document C is a prime example of how determined a country was to have a strong military through the spending records and what equipment they were spending it on. As we compare the countries between 1890 and 1914 we can see that Austria-Hungary and Germany combined only spent about 40 million British pounds in armaments, but by 1914

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

Militarism and Alliances were some of the leading causes that led to World War 1. Document D states, “...if we realize that there is no welfare for us without power, without a strong army and a strong fleet.” Along with that Document A shows a map which clearly shows the European Alliances that were present. In the evidence provided Document D represents how important militarism was to obtaining power by stating that without power which requires a strong army and fleet there is no welfare.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

The June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand by the Serbian Black Hand Group, caused Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia. As their allies got involved this conflict grew into World War I (WWI). This event wasn’t the real cause of the war, it was just the spark that started it. Most people would say the causes were imperialism, nationalism, alliances and militarism.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

World War 1 was the first global conflict as it was a struggle between the leading world powers in Europe that had colonised the 19th century. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Bosnia, heir to the Austrian-Hungary throne was a major trigger factor that led to the World War breaking out. It initially began as a European quarrel caused by the rivalry between nations which led to a series of mobilisations. In addition, there were many other vital factors to consider and these include Imperialism, Nationalism, Alliances and Militarism. This essay will explain how the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in 1914 triggered a number of events that led to the outbreak of World War 1.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

In the late 19th century “The European leaders believed that by creating a balance of power they could prevent such horror. This idea was that if all the counties had balanced strengths that nobody could dominate the rest. There was a wide-spread of wars due to the sharing of the boarders. The triple alliance was fought in France and in Russia. It was the war that started all the Alliances.

Read More
1926 Words | 8 Pages

This research is about the medium changes or ’Global Warming’. Global means the universal and warming means warm up or heating, they two retreats To The observed century-scales rise in the level heat of the ground medium And its related effects, also global warming also returning to any genetic changes in medium. Evidence sees that the medium system is changing; most of the additional energies are stored.

Read More

More about Causes Of World War 1 Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document