In Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451”, censorship vs. free speech are central ideas explored through the foil characters of Clarisse McClellan and Faber in relation to Montag’s emotional detachment. Clarisse's independent spirit and inquisitiveness about the worlds she encounters show the dangers of a society that discourages intellectual inquiry and encourages mindless compliance. Faber's persona, on the other hand, stands in for the negative effects of censorship, including the loss of knowledge and individualism. Through their interactions with Montag, the novel provides insight into the value of free speech and the consequences of a society that suppresses it, while also emphasizing the importance of emotional connection and humanity.
The
…show more content…
Faber is a retired professor who withdraws from society out of fear of government censorship. He is aware of the value of books and speech, but he lacks the courage to put his ideals into practice. When Montag seeks Faber’s help, Faber hesitates to assist him, saying, “I've had this little item for months. But I almost let you go, I'm that afraid!” (Bradbury 87). Montag is daring and willing to question the status quo, in contrast to Faber's fear and inaction. Through Faber, Bradbury portrays the dangers of censorship and the importance of free speech. “I’m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the ‘guilty,’ but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself. And when finally they set the structure to burn the books, using the firemen, I grunted a few times and subsided, for there were no others grunting or yelling with me, by then. Now, it’s too late.” (Bradbury 78). When Montag visits Faber, the professor explains how he didn’t take action when books were first banned. Faber sees himself as being guilty of a crime, instead of the people who fought for literature. As Faber did not speak out, he never learned who else was on his side, and doesn’t know how to speak out now. His lack of knowing who his allies were is another example of how unconnected people in this world are. “So now do you see why books are hated and feared? They show the pores in the face of life. The comfortable people want only wax moon faces, poreless, hairless, expressionless. We are living in a time when flowers are trying to live on flowers, instead of growing on good rain and black loam.” (Bradbury 79). The underlying conflict between censorship and free speech is highlighted in this quote. Faber agrees that people have the freedom to select what they read, watch, and believe, but censorship aims to restrict access to specific ideas or information in