ipl-logo

Chandler V. Kanander Case Summary

961 Words4 Pages

A: A marriage is presumed valid and enforceable unless a party can legally prove otherwise.
In Chandler v. Chander, Richard (husband) had failed 1) to petition the court to enter a Declaratory Judgment, despite his specific allegation that the marriage was void; it’s become signiticant. 2) Richard only requested the Court to set aside the property settlement. 3) Richard had failed to discover the legality of his marriage for more than 30 years, let it tolled, and 4) Richard had failed to prosecute his claim effectively. Because Richard Chandler had lived in Texas where common law marriage is recognized; therefore, he assumed that his marriage is perfectly legal, valid and enforceable. He was not alone, countless people living in the states …show more content…

Without testimony or affirmation of witnesses, parties must prove that they have a clear intent to marry each other, and can further prove their common law marriage existed by documents, such as joint income tax filing, joint names in car/home/health/life insurances, real (deeds, rental agreements) and personal properties, claims, court documents, children’s birth certificates, photgraphs, and various forms of documents available when couple subscribed their names which addressed themselves as husband and wife.

Q. Discuss situations illustrated in your readings and explain the problems inherent in those scenarios.

A. One of the most challenging element to prove a common law marriage is the clear intent to enter a valid marriage buy both parties, not just one party. As decided in Hargrave v. Duval-Couetil (777 N.W.2d 380), the Supreme Court of South Dakota concluded that to meet common law mariage requirements, the mutual agreement or declaration to marry would have to be more than an implicit agreement. In this case, the party failed to establish a clear intent to marry, and as a matter of law, Hargrave could not prove by clear and convining evidence that the couple entered into a valid comon law marriage.

Q. Is common law marriage recognized in Massachusetts? If so, under what

Show More
Related

Arizona V. Case Briefs

258 Words | 2 Pages

Brief Arizona v. Hicks 480 U.S. 321 (1987) Facts: A bullet was fired through the floor of Hick’s apartment on April 18th, 1987. The bullet injured a man in the apartment below Hick’s apartment. Police officers arrived at Hick’s apartment to investigate the shooting. Upon investigating, the police officers seized 3 weapons and a stocking mask. Also, while investigating, one of the police officers noticed expensive stereo equipment.

Read More

Whitley Vs Albers Case Summary

405 Words | 2 Pages

1. In this case a major fight broke out in the cafeteria. As officers tried to regain control of the situation, one of the prisoner’s fingers was broken. The prisoner does not have a case against the prison/officer.

Read More

Melton V. Young Case Study

231 Words | 1 Pages

The Melton v. Young case is about a high school student that was suspended for wearing a jacket with a Confederate flag. The issue that was discussed is, whether or not the school officials could suspend a student for wearing Confederate flag. The clothing sparking racial tension was also discussed. The racial tension from the previous year was an argument for the defense because it can be said that the jacket could have refueled this. The defense also stated that the Melton family was informed of the new rules and chose to break them.

Read More

Moran V. Burbine Case Study

218 Words | 1 Pages

Kaelea Tullly Moran v. Burbine Case When detained by the Police in Cranston, Rhode Island for breaking and entering Brian Burine was immediately given his Miranda Rights and he denied his right to a lawyer. Though the entire process the piece seemed to have obtained evidence they Mr. Burbine had committed a murder in near by providence Rhode Island. He confessed to the breaking and entering and tot the murder when he waved his rights. Because Mr. Burbine’s sister knew he had an appointment with a certain lawyer she called his office but he specifically was not available but his partner was.

Read More

Analysis Of The Vonlee Titlow V. Case

513 Words | 3 Pages

Vonlee Titlow was tried for murder when she and her aunt Billie Rodgers killed Billie's wealthy husband Donald Rodgers. The prosecution Presented Titlow with a plea bargain of manslaughter, for her testimony against her aunt Billie in her trial. Shortly before the Trial of Titlow's aunt Billie, she had a conversation with an officer, who instructed her not to take the plea if she was, in fact, innocent. After this conversation, Titlow got rid of her current lawyer for new counsel in her case. Toca who was brought in as this new counsel fought to get the length of the plea reduced to a lower term.

Read More

V. Corey, 566 F. 2d 429, 431 (1977)

848 Words | 4 Pages

2. Predicate Acts The De Sole and Howard Plaintiffs have alleged predicate acts of mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343. In addition, Howard alleges false labeling of visual art, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2318, as a predicate act. Hammer argues, however, that Plaintiffs have not alleged that Hammer committed a predicate act and, in particular, have not alleged that "Hammer used the mail or the wires for the purpose of executing the alleged scheme."

Read More

People V Smith Case Summary

970 Words | 4 Pages

People v. Smith, 437 Mich 293, 470 NW2D 70, 78 (1991) addresses public policy conflicts and balance as it relates to the juvenile justice process (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). The issue presented in People v. Smith (1991) by the Supreme Court of Michigan is whether the inclusion in the presentence investigative report of an expunged juvenile record, in this case of defendant, Ricky Franklin Smith, requires, under MCR 5.913, presently MCR 5.925(E), that Smith be resentenced (People v. Smith, 1991). The issue involved was that Smith argued that he should be resentenced due to the inclusion of the pre-sentence investigative report of his previously expunged juvenile record. In People v. Smith (1991), it is stated that, “The purpose of the court rule,

Read More

Mr. Anthony V. Wright Case Of 1991

203 Words | 1 Pages

Mr. Anthony Wright was charged with first-Degree Rape, burglary, robbery and possession of an instrument of crime in 1991. The evidence against Mr. Wright is the clothing that Mr. Wright allegedly used to commit the crime, his voluntary, and complete signed confession after 14 minutes in custody and they had five witnesses to testified against Wright. There were so many flaws in this case, the clothes at the scene did not belong to Mr. Wright and the officers used two known crack dealers and three teenagers as witnesses against Wright. No one bothered to interview any witnesses to rule out Mr. Wright. He was nowhere near the victim’s home

Read More

District Of Columbia V. Miller Case Summary

624 Words | 3 Pages

In my first case, I will analyze the Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller. In this case, in a 5-4 decision, the Court overrules its decision in United States v. Miller, in which, it stated that the Second Amendment only protects the right to keep and bear arms in relation with service in a well-regulated, government sponsored militia. In the majority opinion of Heller, Scalia divides the Second Amendment into two parts: the prefatory clause and the operative clause. The prefatory clause is the first half of the Second Amendment, it reads: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,” while the operative clause is the second half of the Amendment: “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Bowers V. Hardwick

162 Words | 1 Pages

In 1986, the U.S. supreme court ruled to uphold the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law criminalizing anal and oral sex in private between consenting adults, marking a legal precedent allowing individual states to freely enforce sodomy statutes of their own. This supreme court case, Bowers v. Hardwick, began when Michael Hardwick was found by police having oral sex with another man when they entered his home. Hardwick was charged with sodomy, a felony in Georgia. A preliminary hearing was held with Hardwick, as a self-described practicing homosexual, asserting that the anti-sodomy statute placed him in imminent danger of arrest. He filed suit in Federal District Court, arguing the statute was unconstitutional.

Read More

Palmer V. Ferguson Case Brief

667 Words | 3 Pages

In Palmer v. Thompson, 391 F.2d 324 (5th Cir. Miss. 1967), twelve Black American citizens living in Jackson, Mississippi, filed a suit on behalf of themselves and fellow Black American citizens seeking an injunction against the Mayor and Commissioners of Jackson, its Police Chief, and its Director of Recreation, alleging discriminatory conduct in the operation of the city’s swimming pools and jails. In 1963 the “City of Jackson closed all swimming pools which it owned and operated. From that time forward “no municipal swimming facilities were opened to any citizen of either race. And the city acknowledged that it did not intend to reopen or operate any of the swimming facilities on an integrated basis. The city contended that the racial integration of the pools would endanger personal safety of all citizens and would pose a problem for officials to maintain law and order.

Read More

Bowers V Hardwick Case Brief

669 Words | 3 Pages

John and Mary Doe, a heterosexual married couple were also plaintiffs in the action. Michael Joseph Bowers, the Attorney General of Georgia was the appellee. Decision: The Court’s decision is that the statute did not violate the Respondent’s fundamental rights. Because, despite the consensual homosexual sodomy was committed to private, sodomy was still a criminal offense which was proscribed by the States’ law. The act of sodomy was not protected by any constitutional law.

Read More

Loving Vs Virginia Case Study

1141 Words | 5 Pages

Maynard v. Hill was used to argue that while marriage is under the social jurisdiction of State police this is not so when the regulation goes against that of the U.S. Constitution (Loving v. Virginia). The prosecution attempted to state that this case was not applicable due to the fourteenth amendment excluding marriage from its limitations but the Supreme Court refuted this notion (U.S. Supreme Court, 2014). Lastly, the ruling of Pace v. Alabama, which established

Read More

Which Of The Following Are Not Considered Literacy Materials

8847 Words | 36 Pages

Elementary Methods Course Unit 2: Integrating Literacy Summary: Over the last decade or so, starting with No Child Left Behind, there has been an emphasis on mandatory state testing in reading and mathematics. The Department of Education uses student test scores to evaluate teachers and school districts. With the focus on reading and math, other content areas such as science and social studies classes have been reduced to only a few minutes each week or have completely vanished. In some districts, science and social studies can only be taught if it is integrated into reading and language arts classes.

Read More

Thesis Statement For Gay Marriage Essay

934 Words | 4 Pages

Marriage has been a part of life since before the medieval times. For two individuals who adore each other and arrangement on spending whatever remains of their lives together, the usual impulse is to make it legitimate and get hitched. This being said same-sex marriage had been broadly talked about and bantered on if it ought to be sanctioned or not. It is segregating not to permit two individuals who need to get hitched because they are a gay person. Authorizing same-sex marriage would perceive the American long for equal rights for all.

Read More

More about Chandler V. Kanander Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document