ipl-logo

Changes And Continuities Of The Roman Republic

693 Words3 Pages

The Roman Republic was a representative democracy that evolved to address the changing nature of Roman society. It was founded in 509 BCE after the overthrow of the last Roman king, and it lasted for over 400 years. During that time, the Roman Republic expanded its territory, its population, and its power. It also faced several challenges, including civil wars, foreign invasions, and economic crises. Despite Rome’s founding on the principles of a republic, it struggled to fairly represent all its citizens.

The Roman Republic emerged in 509 BCE following the overthrow of the Roman monarchy. As Gibbons and Livy in History of Rome both say, Rome got too big and too wealthy too fast, with the emperors being lax with their power and control …show more content…

Initially, this system was exclusive, with political power retained by a few wealthy residents known as patricians. The working class, also known as plebs, had no voting power or right to run for office, creating significant tensions. Plebeians started pushing for more participation in government, which resulted in the creation of numerous offices and assemblies that allowed them to participate in decision-making. Despite Livy emphasizing the inclusion of the plebs in the republic, he also points out that wealthy people continued to have a large advantage in this political system, while the plebs were essentially ignored in decision-making. However, others were more comfortable with tensions that come from a democratic style of government. Machiavelli argues the opposite, saying that protest and successions are a natural part of a republic. Both authors highlight the competing priorities that the different classes brought to the table. Ultimately, even though Rome was on the path of something better by letting more people partake in the government, it still left people …show more content…

Women and freed slaves were unable to vote, which was around fifty percent of the population. Of the remaining potential voters, historians guess that two to twenty-five percent participated in the election process, according to Alan Ward, in his book, How Democratic Was the Roman Republic? If people wanted to vote for government officials, they would have to come to Rome and cast a vote there, leaving out at least seventy-five percent of the population based on how big the roman empire was at the time. Another potential flaw with the roman republic is with the actual history written down about it. Mary Beard talks about this in her book, A History of Ancient Rome, saying that Livy wrote his historical accounts 400 years after the events took place, causing us to question how reliable writers at the time were. Many people were left out of the roman republic, leaving a small number of people able to partake in elections and decisions that affected

Show More
Related
690 Words | 3 Pages

The exclusive right of the assemblies to pass legislation along with the inclusion of various citizens in the voting process, supports the characterization of the Roman Republic as a democracy in formal

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

At this time it didn't matter about the division in society, “Even the poorest of Roman citizens, the proletarii, were still represented.” They used to not look down on the poor, but they used them to become a stronger and more productive community. Although they were fairly democratic in the beginning, whenever they expanded, it slowly began to change. “Once Roman territory had expanded…it was mostly the well-to-do rural voter and their clients who could afford the time and expense to come to Rome.” (Document C)

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Rome started as a republic and ended as a dictatorship. The empires in Rome were the world's greatest empire. These empires started around 750 BCE. Around 200 BCE the Greek empire was weakening and Rome was getting stronger.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

The Roman Republic greatly influence the many forms of government that came after it, its many contributions to government significantly impacted modern day governments of today. Yet to understand it we must first find knowledge to how the Roman Republic came to be. The answer is fairly simple, due to the harsh rule of the Etruscan they were kicked out of Rome and the Romans formed the Rome Republic. Yet, the Rome Republic developed over time, it when through refinements as time passed. Such things as the Senate, magistrates, tripartite, checks and balances are some of the examples that the Roman Republic influenced on modern U.S. government.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

The Roman Empire and Roman Republic were two distinct periods in the history of ancient Rome. The Roman Republic was established in 509 BC, following the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. It lasted until 27 BC when the Roman Empire was established under the rule of Augustus. One of the main differences between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was their form of government. The Roman Republic was a system of government where elected officials represented the people.

Read More
236 Words | 1 Pages

The Roman Republic was upheld by a republican constitution and, similar to the Athenian government, gave more power to the citizens in the decision making process. The Roman Republic constitution on the other hand also valued the rule of law and implemented checks and balances to prevent one single person or class from taking control of the republic. The republican constitution had a significant impact on the creation, maintenance, and success of the Roman Empire. By implementing the importance of the rule of law, the Roman Republic was able to create the groundwork for a successful republic to ensure that political leaders were going to be held accountable. They created the Senate which established a representative government to debate on

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

In 509 B.C.E. the Romans had taken back their own rule that the Etruscans had maintained for Decades(RR). A republic was formed after the Romans were in control again that gave the people a say in how the state was run(RR). Many countries had copied this form of government including the United States(RR). The Romans also had the three branches of government. The executive legislative, and judicial branch.

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

The establishment of the Roman Republic was the result of a series of struggles against kingship in ancient Rome. The circumstances that led to the establishment of the Republic can be traced back to the overthrow of the last Roman King, Tarquin the Proud, in 509 BC. The Roman people were dissatisfied with the rule of the Etruscan kings and sought to establish a more democratic form of government that would limit the power of any single individual. One of the key elements of the Roman Republic that made it democratic was the system of checks and balances that was put in place to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was a magnificent political system with a lifespan of more than 500 years. Its impact on the modern world cannot be overestimated, as it served as a template for numerous democratic regimes all over the world. Nevertheless, historians cannot dispute the Republic’s eventual collapse, and several possible causes have been put forth. The rise of strong military leaders who overthrew the system of checks and balances that had previously kept the government in check is, in my opinion, the most significant cause that contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. The Roman government was established in the early Republic on a complicated system of checks and balances that were meant to prevent any one person or party from acquiring excessive power.

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Bill’s moral responsibility in the case of the train is to switch the tracks towards Sarah causing her death and preventing the death of a hundred. This view is one like shared by utilitarians, who hope to produce the greatest amount of good. Though Bill will have to directly cause a death, allowing one hundred would be more than immoral. Utilitarianism gives us insight as to why Bill should prioritize the train, while deontology shines light on how Bill may feel after doing so. The threshold in this situation in contrast with feeling a sense of restraint, allows for us to see the weight of his actions in relation to deontology and utilitarianism.

Read More
400 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout ancient history many strong nations fell apart trying to create the perfect government. The Romans were one of the many nations that tried out a democracy, but they didn’t a great job at being fair. The Roman Republic was not a strong democracy because most people didn’t have the money to travel to Rome to vote, only the really wealthy had control over the main part of the government, and the wealthy landowners could rent their land to normal people, but the normal people, instead of paying, had to do pretty much everything the landowner told them to do including going to fight for them. One of the main reasons that it wasn’t a strong democracy was because only the rich people could afford the money to travel to Rome and vote.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

In the early years of the Republic, only patricians, who were members of the noble families, were allowed to hold political office. This led to a long struggle by the plebeians to gain political power, which was eventually granted through the creation of the office of the Tribune of the Plebs. Another undemocratic practice of the Republic was the exclusion of women from political power. Women were not allowed to vote or hold political office, and they were generally relegated to the domestic sphere.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

Daniel Ward Republican and Imperial Rome Midterm Essay One John Locke once wrote,” Things of this world are in so constant a flux that nothing remains long in the same state.” The constitution of the Roman Republic was a political construct designed to deal with the social and political fluctuation. Its loose framework allowed it to evolve through Rome’s humble origins to its dominance of the known world. The evolution of the constitution proved to be a parallel for the rise of Rome.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

Read More

More about Changes And Continuities Of The Roman Republic

Related Topics

Open Document