ipl-logo

Explain Bill's Moral Responsibility In The Case Of The Train

436 Words2 Pages

Bill’s moral responsibility in the case of the train is to switch the tracks towards Sarah causing her death and preventing the death of a hundred. This view is one like shared by utilitarians, who hope to produce the greatest amount of good. Though Bill will have to directly cause a death, allowing one hundred would be more than immoral. Utilitarianism gives us insight as to why Bill should prioritize the train, while deontology shines light on how Bill may feel after doing so. The threshold in this situation in contrast with feeling a sense of restraint, allows for us to see the weight of his actions in relation to deontology and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical view that favors actions producing the “greatest good.” The use of utilitarian action is displayed in the case of Joe the janitor, when the doctor faces the problem of saving one hundred lives at the price of one. By killing a single janitor, the doctor would save a large number of people.. …show more content…

The guilt of causing the death of an innocent person may drive deontologists to refrain from taking any type of action. In this same way, Joe the doctor may think like a deontologist if he doesn’t make the sacrifice in order to keep a clear conscience. This method of thinking favors not being involved in what would bring forth consequences. It’s easy to not take action but when there are one hundred lives on the line, not taking action itself, can come with consequences. This gives us a perfect example of a threshold. Deontologists and Utilitarians would agree that there is an amount of hard that is morally acceptable to allow. In our cases of the doctor and engineer there are a lot of lives on the line. In any case not taking action would be equivalent to letting a large sum of people

Show More
Related
1673 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong when looking at the outcomes. It believes that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. Consequentialism is found in utilitarianism; consequentialism is largely thought about during war. When you fight for your life in war, you end up taking another person's life. While this may be good for your country, it is hurting a different country.

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

If he harvests the healthy person’s organs and incidentally kills him, five lives can be saved. According to Foot, this is not the same setup as the Trolley Driver. In this example, the surgeon does not have to choose between killing one and killing five, but rather between letting five die and killing one to save five. With Foot’s logic, the duty not to harm the healthy person trumps the duty to aid the five patients, because negative duties are obligatory while positive duties are permissible and commendable. This example prefaces the Train Dilemma

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Marmar Tavasol Word Count: 815 The Right to End Suffering Mrs. Brown, a patient with ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) should have the option to end her life prematurely or to stay alive and suffer tremendously from a disease that is bound to kill her. Based on the readings and lecture in class, it has become apparent to me that choosing to die by withdrawing medication and choosing to die by taking medication follow very similar reasoning. On the paper Story of Teresa & Terrence - The Established Medical/Legal View, a parallel description of the reasoning that is followed for each case is shown, making clear the logical differences of each patient. In my opinion, the differences in the two cases of Teresa and Terrence are trivial at best.

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

In the poem "Ode to Dirt" by Sharon Olds, the speakers complex attitude toward dirt evolves from one of disgust to one of admiration and even approval. Olds uses a variety of word choices and figurative language to convey this growth. At the beginning of the poem, the speaker describes dirt as "mud / and dust / and dirt / clods / that stick to your shoes. " The use of these simple, plain words conveys a sense of disgust and disrespect for dirt. The speaker goes on to describe how, as a child, they were forced to clean the dirt off their shoes and wash their hands "as if God / and the germs would be angry with us."

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, Thomson finds it puzzling that it is permissible to kill a person by turning the trolley, but not permissible to kill a person by removing his organs since both of these scenarios have the same “net saving of four lives”(Thomson, pg.2). In this essay, I will articulate how Thomson attempts to solve this puzzle by arguing that her view of redirecting existing harm and avoiding infringement of

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

What is utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is the belief that the best moral action is one that focuses on overall happiness of the group rather than happiness of individuals. In the chapter “Where Have All the Criminals Gone?” in Levitt & Dubner’s book “Freakonomics”, adopts a utilitarian tone whilst taking at look the drastic drop in crime in the 1990’s. This tone is reflected most heavily while topics of an increased police force, gun regulations, and abortion are discussed.

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

With doctors and nurses following through with what a patient chooses to do and respecting the decision made produces a mutual relationship of trust. 3.How does utilitarianism determine what we ought to do? 

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarian is a regularizing moral hypothesis that place the locus of good and bad exclusively on the result, the end legitimize the mean. Solving and taking care of the issue is most important. All matters is just the final products if the final products is great then what you did was ethically right. Considering things are at stake for both stakeholder involved. Utilitarian principles sates that proper course action maximize happiness and treat other how you would wanted to be treated.

Read More
1778 Words | 8 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that insist that the best action is one that generates the most happiness/good. There are two subcategories of utilitarianism, which are act-utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Both subcategories of unitarianism theory has led to many debates over its effectiveness in our modern society due to many believing it has too many flaws. Supporters of both utilitarianism views believes that it gives a clear and easy to understand guideline and helps with making tough decisions. Though utilitarianism does give some helpful guidelines with life it still has many flaws that causes it to lose its effectiveness.

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarianism is the belief that the best action is the one that brings the most happiness to the most people. In Omelas,

Read More
1607 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is a philosophical position used to determine how morally right an action is. According to utilitarianism, goodness is connected to usefulness in producing positive states, such as happiness, pleasure and convenience (Morris, 2011). Utilitarianism sees goodness and righteousness as tied to human flourishing, and so the most morally

Read More
2262 Words | 10 Pages

To deal with these dilemmas, utilitarianism and duty ethics theories should be taken into account. For a utilitarian decision maker, who will attempt to maximize the sum of utility for all concerned (Kvalnes, 2015), the third person should pull the switch or push the fat man to reduce the killings from five persons to one person; that is, keeping the number of people died to a minimum. In contrast, in duty ethics perspectives, there are moral considerations more important than

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

These included: hospitals, schools and military barracks. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory which tells us that the right course of action is the one which increases the overall ‘good’ consequences of the action. Therefore it is a form of consequentialism, which details the meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are the most influential contributors to this theory.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

The morality of an action is determined by the outcome of that action. At an initial glance, Utilitarianism seems as if it would be a superior way to live a life full of good will, as it is focused on doing the most

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory based on the idea that an action is moral if it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The theory is concerned with predicted consequences or outcomes of a situation rather than focusing on what is done to get to the outcome. There are many forms of utilitarianism, having been introduced by Jeremy Bentham (act utilitarianism), and later being updated by scholars such as J.S. Mill (rule utilitarianism) and Peter Singer (preference utilitarianism). When referring to issues of business ethics, utilitarianism can allow companies to decide what to do in a given situation based on a simple calculation. Many people would agree that this idea of promoting goodness

Read More

More about Explain Bill's Moral Responsibility In The Case Of The Train

Related Topics

Open Document