ipl-logo

Chapter Summary Of Chapter One By Jay Heinrichs

591 Words3 Pages

In chapter 1 Jay Heinrichs, the author of the book, to uses examples from his family life to help introduce the central theme. He starts with an example of arguing with his son about toothpaste, Heinrichs’s argument with George reaches a clear resolution unlike some of the other examples given in the text. Heinrichs does this to show readers a way to argue while showing intelligence. Having established the importance of controversy and rhetoric in an everyday setting, Heinrichs states that rhetoric is an “unavoidable a part of life”. This is where he introduces the central idea of the book which is that rhetoric is necessary and unavoidable part of life he goes on to state that it’s as relevant within the twenty first century as it was in …show more content…

A skilled arguer like Heinrichs or Socrates is aware of a how to use rhetorical techniques to influence audiences to agree voluntarily. Heinrichs goes on to site research that shows that married couples, who fight, are less likely to stay together than those who argue. Heinrichs lists another example with that his readers relate to: getting a ticket a skilled arguer could also be ready to get out of by recognizing the main goal, not obtaining the ticket and resisting the temptation to argue with the officer. Heinrichs’ analysis of the traffic incident might apply to nearly any argument: persuaders should decide whether or not they should get involved in a debate to some extent. Sometimes the most effective strategy is to concede to some extent and stay centered on the goal of the argument. Heinrichs then states that Cicero is one among his rhetorical heroes, and a outstanding figure throughout the book. Like several of the samples of persuasion within the book, Heinrichs’s discussion of putting someone might sound belittling but it is an essential part of winning an argument. He states that doing this step before actually trying to convince them is a large part of how arguments are won and that people do this step involuntarily (like his daughter). the chapter goes on to discuss how making an audience act a certain way is the most difficult part and how it can be accomplished by making acting that way seem

Show More
Related
129 Words | 1 Pages

Grant-Davie describes thoroughly the term rhetorical situation and how the development of the definition and its constituents has contributed to the discovery of the motives and responses behind any discourse. The analysis of rhetorical situations could determine the outer or inner influences of the rhetors, the audience, and their particular constraints. Grant Davie supports his claims by using the earlier definitions of scholars and teachers as his foundation. He also addresses his own analysis drawn by life experienced discourses which it also helps the reader understand the causes of rhetorical situations. This is important because it teaches any writer or reader to analyze a situation and think about the options and paths it could lead

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Victor Rios begins chapter six by describing the way the Latino boys he studied used masculinity as a rehabilitative tool. He describes how the boys are constantly “questioning” each other’s manhood as a way of proving their own masculinity. “The boys’ social relations with one another and with community members were saturated with expressions and discourses of manhood” (pg.125). Rios continues to describe the affects criminalization and its gendered practices has influenced these young boy’s mentality of what it means to be masculine. In chapter six, the author explains that although the boys had easy access to weapons, they rarely used them because of their clear understanding the consequences associated with such violence.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Joe Johnson 01/04/18 Writ 1122 Online Yin & Yang To begin, it is important to lay out the definition that each Lloyd Bitzer and Richard Vatz give to the rhetorical situation. According to Lloyd Bitzer “Rhetorical situation may be defined as a complex of persons, events, objects, and relations presenting an actual or potential exigence which can be completely or partially removed if discourse, introduced into the situation, can so constrain human decisions or action as to bring about the significant modification of the exigence.” (Bitzer) Put into layman’s terms, Lloyd Bitzer believes that there are three main parts that create a rhetorical situation – Exigence, Audience, and a set of constraints.

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

Reading chapter five, I noticed a change in Ellis perspective on religion and the author's tone. The author uses a fearful tone throughout the book. The author shows the tone in different ways throughout the book, and some place easier to notice than others. The author puts in a fearful tone that I got threw the characters by how they are acting.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

Within “Thank You for Arguing What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson Can Teach us About the Art of Persuasion,” Jay Heinrichs, a skilled editor, and author with a long history of rhetoric delineates a very educational lesson over the power of persuasive writing or speaking in order to interact with the world around us. He accomplishes this by lucidly describing the steps to become a powerful persuader. My favorite chapter is chapter 7, which proves, to me, that this book should continue to be used in schools. Heinrichs organizes the book by explaining the skill then recounting an anecdote to help further explain when and how the strategy is most useful.

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

Thank You for Arguing is a popular substitute textbooks for upper level English classes written by Jay Heinrichs, a journalist that has taught the art of persuasion to numerous Ivy League schools, the Pentagon, and even NASA. In attempt to restore that art of persuasion, Heinrichs submerges the modern world into the ancient realm of persuasion in the most entertaining way possible. Based on the teachings of Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson, this clever approach to teachings displays the best of rhetoric through the eyes of the twenty-first century. Despite other unique methods, Heinrichs primarily utilizes anecdotes to convey various techniques which is best displayed in Chapter 21: Lead Your Tribe.

Read More
324 Words | 2 Pages

Thank You for Arguing, written by Jay Heinrichs is a novel written for the purpose of understanding, and employing rhetoric in one’s writing, speeches, and everyday life. Heinrich introduces different types of rhetoric used to persuade people, Heinrich cites examples of these to further explain his the different types of rhetoric. Throughout the introduction and first part Heinrich analyzes different types of rhetorical arguments, and further explains them by providing real life examples, Jay heinrichs establishes the importance of rhetoric in the introduction of Thank You for Arguing by exposing its rich history. heinrichs then goes on to explain how vital rhetoric is in everyday life by giving examples stemming from his own life. The uses

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetoric writing, the art of persuasion, is a profound form that Greek philosopher, Aristotle, created. He created the three appeals, ethos, logos, and pathos which influence the tone, purpose, and context of the writing piece. The four pieces of writing, that I drew connections between, are all written differently but possess the same effective way of communicating with honesty and share the subtle goal of manipulation. The first piece of writing is called Man Takes First Steps on the Moon which is written as an article in a special edition of The Times.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Journal Response The chapter “A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers” by Erika Lindemann describes how people use rhetoric unconsciously on their daily lives through writing or speaking. The term rhetoric is explained as being influential; teachers in particular are described to make use of rhetoric means to encourage their students into learning. Nevertheless, the rhetoric term has been under discussion over the years. The initials connotations given to this term were on the negative side; Lindemann describes how thinkers from old times expressed that the term rhetorical was mostly inclined towards the usage of appealing language leaving the importance of the message itself aside.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

In regards to Hart and Daughton, the role of analysis in rhetorical criticism plays an important role in a variety of ways. From persuasion, to structure and form, to syntax, each showcases a significant faction of analysis in rhetorical criticism. Persuasion, relates to several differential logic forms – human and informal, which tie together arguments considered thin, and those considered higher in class. In analyzing, persuasively, it is important that an individual does not immediately classify a reasoning put forth by a rhetor, to be not credible. This is due to the assumptions, or biases people bring with them in daily life; such as, the idea that people have reasons for doing what they do, and the idea that persuasion is generally credible.

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

In the Introduction/Part One of Thank You For Arguing by Jay Heinrichs, the author uses real-life examples to inform and entertain the reader about the significance of arguing in society and how to do it efficiently. In order to effectively argue, Jay Heinrichs explains that the individual must first know what their purpose or goal is. An effective argument results in action or choices and by discovering what the speaker wants out of an argument, he/she can form the argument accordingly. Furthermore, Heinrichs states that any issue involving persuasion can fit into the categories: blame, values, and choice. Blame issues should be addressed in the past tense and is named by Aristotle as “forensic” rhetoric because it deals with issues of justice in the courtroom.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Analyzing and Evaluating Rhetoric in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Words can change one's mind by how convincing the person s and power they put in their words. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar was brought to an end by his own people he loved and trusted. Brutus use of rhetoric is convincing to all romans and showed them his reason of killing Caesar was the only choice to save rome. Brutus use of rhetoric, ultimately makes his eulogy more effective, than Mark antony's use of pathos to try and get the romans his side.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

Many people have a certain opinion when it comes to their standing on tattoos, whether they see them as beautiful pieces of art, or body mutilation, everyone subscribes to a different belief. Many people who see teenagers, believe that these teens are “troubled”, or impulsive and impressionable, which at that point in the brain’s development that may be true, but they never consider that maybe that teen is ready, or is willing to commit to the tattoo simply because it is something that has importance to them. Andres Martin, a child psychiatrist, wrote an article in a 2000 edition of the magazine “Reclaiming Our Children and Youth” about teenagers and tattoos, where he directly addresses the reasons that would support the ideas behind teens getting tattoos. Andres

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

In “A Brush with Reality: Surprises in the Tube” by David Bodanis, the audience or reader is informed about how toothpaste in made, the ingredients which are used to make it and even a suggested alternative which would bring about the same result. Bodanis wastes no time sharing his view of the product, using vivid and illustrative expressions to describe its appalling ingredients. His arguments force us to consider whether or not this common household item should be used. He also uses imagery to allow his readers to have a sense of familiarity with the topic. One such expression is found when he says, “It’s there because people like to have a big gob of toothpaste to spread on the brush”.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Since ancient times, the art of communication has been widely developed due to its massive importance and strength. Thus, a group of Greek orators called Sophists developed the use of rhetoric, which is a particular oratorical technique that helps the speechmaker to construct his statements in a more convincing way. Plato and Aristotle were the first two philosophers who used this technique during their monologues. In many different contexts, the use of rhetoric has been associated with persuasion; in fact, it has been defined as “the art of persuasion” (Simons, 2011, p.6). However, what is this concept?

Read More

More about Chapter Summary Of Chapter One By Jay Heinrichs

Related Topics

Open Document