Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories underpinning qualitative methods
Qualitative research
Strengths and limitations of qualitative method
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories underpinning qualitative methods
COM 311: Patient Provider Communication – Article Review Assignment Identify the article you are reviewing in the box below with a complete APA citation. Then, answer each question completely in 1-2 paragraphs. Responses must be typed and printed prior to class. Assignments are due at the start of class and should be 2 pages or less, single-spaced, in Times New Roman black font, with 1” margins. Staple or print double-sided if needed.
A cross-sectional qualitative study using purposive sampling to select children of differing ages was conducted. One researcher with a history in qualitative studies interviewed the 32 children participating in the study. The researcher held practice interviews with a colleague with experience interviewing children. When possible children were interviewed in their home, although 3 of the children were interviewed in a hospital setting. Interviews lasted between 17 and 90 minutes.
The quantitative research that I will critique, is about the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in reducing the risk of gastric injury in elderly patients who undergo an aspirin regimen. According to the study, over 50% of elderly patients who had taken either a Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), or aspirin for less than 30 days presented some type of gastro intestinal (GI) lesion (cite). This very high number causes concern, since aspirin and NSAID’s are commonly used medications to treat, and prevent a variety of conditions. The study aims to answer two questions, the first is the risk of ulcers linked to the acute or chronic use of aspirin, and/or NSAIDs. The second question is the efficacy of anti-acid secretory treatments on these ulcers (cite).
A. Describe the roles of nurses in critiquing studies to determine the research evidence that is ready for use in practice. Nurses are usually the healthcare workers that are most intimately involved in the daily care of patients. The nursing practice is always evolving and changing, and nurses rely on research to give them new ways to improve their care. Therefore, nurses critique studies to determine when it is ready to be implemented pragmatically. They will critique the study and results to determine if more questions need to be answered, if the research is thorough and unbiased, and if the data is complete.
As quantitative data would not be robust enough to explain complex issues. for e.g. Quantitative data would not allow children to explain their choices. However, qualitative data has some disadvantages in this research. For example, because of the central role played by Corsaro in the generation of data, it is not possible to replicate qualitative studies. Also, contexts, situations, events, conditions, and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent.
While quantitative research can tell you when, where, and how often things happen, qualitative
The author used a qualitative interview survey to determine how practitioners defined social care, whether they practiced it, and what factors influenced their practice, and the information bases they used. Findings from the analysis identified that the personal domain had considerable influence on day-to-day practice, and five themes emerged describing the personal domain: ‘life experiences’, ‘beliefs and values’, ‘ideas and theories’, ‘personal relationships’, and ‘personal characteristics’. I feel this contribution is relevant to the topic because it opens space to explore personal domain challenges for social work practitioners and students, to critically reflect on how life experiences, beliefs/values, ideas/ theories and personal relationships,
236). Qualitative methods especially one that is based on grounded theories give the researcher the flexibility of maneuvering research frameworks in which new theories are discovered. Using quantitative methods for this study will be difficult because it does not involve much numeric figures rather deals with phenomenon. However, there are some disadvantages associated with qualitative methods such as the inability of the researcher to control the influence of bias and rigidity. Also, qualitative research often is expensive to conduct and requires experience especially in transcribing and coding
Design This study uses a descriptive qualitative design the aims of the study are to describe the factors
The analysis of the qualitative assessment results identifies several usability problems that need to be considered in more detail. One of these problems has to do with the cognitive load. According to Zahavi [6] information overload appears when the ability to perceive and understand is exceeded by the amount of informatin presented by a user interface, to the point of facilitating information processing errors. Further work related with this topic should be done, namely to achieve a better organization of the information and an improved version of the graphical design, too flat with poor color contrast. In addition to problems with the cognitive load, the analysis indicates potential problems in the effective presentation of the information.
Introduction Qualitative research are those kind of researches that an outcome is obtained without the application of statistical methods of data analysis (Strauss and Corbin, 1990 cited in Golafshani, 2003). However, the qualitative research takes a direct approach, where the researchers arrive at a conclusion through the observation of events as they occur naturally without external interferences (Golafshani, 2003). Ethical and methodological issues may arise, therefore in order to demonstrate the legitimacy of Qualitative research it is important to integrate rigour and trustworthiness. Potential ethical issues There is the need to take into consideration ethical issues that may arise from conducting qualitative researches.
3. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH THEORY 3.1 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Qualitative research is a form of research in which the researcher collects and interprets data, meaning the researcher is as important in the research process as the participants and the data they provide. Reason and Rowan (2004) have argued that the core element of a qualitative research approach is to connect meanings to the experiences of respondents and their lives. According to Clissett (2008) qualitative research involves a variety of research methods that can be used to explore human experience, perceptions, motivations and behaviours. Qualitative research is characterised by collection and analysis of words in the form of speech or writing.
This thesis examined and analyzed the qualitative
The pie chart and texts of interviews were used as primary data. The diagram was accepted as survey because of quantitative features like . Qualitative data were interviews, which were without edits and analysis. Interviews consisted in-depth understanding points about issue. There were not included biased, unrelated and double barreled questions.
Qualitative research method has been widely used to gather data on specific subjects. With in- depth analysis, this method helps the researcher to get greater insights on various phenomena. The major reason why it is usually preferred over other methods is that it not only examines the when, where and what of a decision making process but also the why and how. Debates, interviews and various other researches are the areas where this approach is commonly used. Depending on the requirement of the research, the data gets streamlined once the entire data is obtained and gathered.