ipl-logo

Roman Virtue: The Good Society

1260 Words6 Pages

Roman Virtue: The Good Society
American author, Frederick Douglas, said of a great nation, “A battle lost or won is easily described, understood, and appreciated, but the moral growth of a great nation requires reflection, as well as observation, to appreciate it.” Expanding beyond the shadow of Greece, Rome grew to become the greatest empire of its time. Rome’s mission was to create a good society. At the core of this good society, and at the core of Rome’s greatness, was the Roman people – the Romanitas. Rome’s journey to greatness can be traced through the virtues of the people, their patriotism, duty to family and state, and an underlying sense of religion.
The Romans founded their history in Homer’s epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey. Accoding to their history, Rome descended from the Trojan prince Aeneas. Aeneas escaped the fall of Troy and settled on the plain of Latium. It was from Aeneas’ line that Rome’s founders, the twins Romulus and Remus, were born. At first, Rome operated under a strained relationship between monarchs and a Senate. However, around 509 BC, a revolution occurred that created the Republic …show more content…

His leadership was not to be a monarchy, which the Romans equated to slavery, but instead a leader of the people. Octavian managed to secure his power by doing what was best for the state. Octavian believed that the state was responsible for promoting a good life for its citizens and thus initiated many reforms to better the state and, therefore, the lives of the people. When Aristides gained citizenship he praised Rome stating, “You have divided into two parts all men throughout your empire... everywhere giving citizenship to all those who are more accomplished, noble, and powerful, even as they retain their nativeborn identities, while the rest you have made subjects and the governed.” With faith restored in the state, and reason once again to be loyal, Rome continued to expand its

Show More
Related
931 Words | 4 Pages

Romans were also not beasts for not participating in government unlike the Athenians who punished them. In document D it also states that they were “ ranked into distinct classes” which shows that they were put together and had their priorities straight. In document F it states “ senate had full governing power in Rome” which is better than in Athens where everyone kinda ruled, Rome was more of a democracy. This evidence all helps to show that Rome was better when it came to citizenship because they were more thought out and not all

Read More
1993 Words | 8 Pages

Death of the Republic 91202 James Morrissey Power in a name Julius Caesar was popular among the citizens of Rome. Caesar had gained this popularity due to his successes in war for Rome and the laws he created for the wellbeing of Rome. The reason Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC was due to declaring himself dictator for life of Rome. This is because the term dictator was considered a toxic word in Roman politics as almost all previous dictators had been tyrants in Roman history. The senators who assassinated Caesar believed that they would be celebrated for killing Caesar .

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Rome started as a republic and ended as a dictatorship. The empires in Rome were the world's greatest empire. These empires started around 750 BCE. Around 200 BCE the Greek empire was weakening and Rome was getting stronger.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

The Romans emerged from Italy and formed their culture that can find its roots among an array of native tribes and Greek colonies that populated Italy. There are two parts of the foundation of a Roman’s identity that stemmed from the cultural influences that produced the Romans, their culture and their ideals. The first component of the foundation of the Roman identity is the usage and the incorporation of others’ myths into their own etiological myth. The second part stems from these myths that made the Romans believe that their existence and success was the result of fate. By looking into Virgil’s Aeneid and Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline one can see that this two-part foundation produced a society and people that embodied this idea that they were the best parts of all the cultures

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

Despite the fall of Imperial Rome which was highly developed for its time, the Romans created many variations in politics, economics and social structure. When forming the United States, our founding fathers used the Romans ancient society as a structure for America. This ancient t model allowed America, early and modern alike, to spiral and become an outstanding figure in global affairs. Although the united states and rome are very different they are also alike in many ways. Rome and the United states are similar because they both have a dying middle class

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

The Romans were proud people who stood up for their country at any time. There was always a story of a man who dropped what he did to go and defend his country as seen with Cincinnatus. If you ever went against the Romans or did not show loyalty to Rome, you were marked for dead. While there were many goods the Romans considered, like the worshipping of the gods, the Highest good for them was loyalty to country. There are many instances of Romans demonstrating their loyalty to Rome.

Read More
235 Words | 1 Pages

This is called an Republic. Another way the Roman Republic were so successful is, by how they let women have rights. Women in the Roman Republic had more rights then early Greek women did. They also played a huge role in society.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was a magnificent political system with a lifespan of more than 500 years. Its impact on the modern world cannot be overestimated, as it served as a template for numerous democratic regimes all over the world. Nevertheless, historians cannot dispute the Republic’s eventual collapse, and several possible causes have been put forth. The rise of strong military leaders who overthrew the system of checks and balances that had previously kept the government in check is, in my opinion, the most significant cause that contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic. The Roman government was established in the early Republic on a complicated system of checks and balances that were meant to prevent any one person or party from acquiring excessive power.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

The Roman aristocrats were totally consumed with the need to retain the legacy of their family’s name. The nobles of Rome would have been under extreme pressure to achieve military prowess and political status. The young nobles felt that their families and their own reputation was at stake, so they devote their lives in service to Rome. They felt like they had to live up to and or overcome they're predecessor's accomplishments, but if they accomplished more with each passing generation then that would make it harder and put more pressure on the later generations. The key of the ancient Roman aristocracy are virtus, gloria, nobilitas and auctoritas.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

While the first societies were built by man, the rules of every society since have have dictated the actions and beliefs of each individual. In the Roman Society presented in William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar is on the verge of being crowned king, and some of his fellow Romans are none too pleased with this. Julius Caesar takes place in ancient Rome in 44 b.c. At this time, Rome was the center of a large empire, but their society had its fair share of problems. Their society gives much of the wealth and power to a select few people while many power-hungry men vie to be absolute leaders.

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

I think that the Roman ideas of honor are much more intense than our ideas of honor, making them more unlike our ideas. An example of honor in our society today is standing up for a friend or staying true to an agrement. Although today, if you do not honor an agreement than the consiquences are not too severe, you may only lose someones trust, athough that too can be gained fairly easily. In Roman times if you broke an agreement the consequences were much more severe, such as ridicule or even death. Another way the Roman honor is different from modern day is they believed if you did something that went against honor than you are no longer good, or pure in Lucretiaś case.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Undoubtedly, one of the causes of the fall of the Roman Republic was a loss of identity. After being ruled by Etruscan kings for so long, the Romans deposed them and rejected “the very idea of kingship” (151). Rather than forming an autocratic government, the Romans established the Roman Republic. Its success derived from the Romans being “conservatives who accepted new things reluctantly” (154). Adopting domestic values rather than foreign ones allowed the Romans to unify under the same principles.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

The little records historians have at their disposal are fantasies at best and give little to no facts about the time period. Next came the Republic. This was a revolutionary form of government which has been mimicked time and time again by other countries. Finally was the dictatorship which was ruled by extremely powerful dictators who had full control of the

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

Read More

More about Roman Virtue: The Good Society

Related Topics

Open Document