ipl-logo

Charles Colson Should Plead Guilty For Ellsberg Trial

857 Words4 Pages

In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a United States military analyst, released the top-secret Pentagon papers to the public. He is on trial under of the charge of the Espionage Act, theft, and conspiracy. The president, Richard Nixon, in the midst of the media’s attacks, orders Charles Colson, a member of his special administration, to dig up some dirt on Ellsberg to discredit him while he is on trial. Colson hires E. Howard Hunt, a CIA officer, to join the president’s Special Investigations Unit. Hunt’s mission escalates to breaking into Ellsberg’s psychiatrist's office and helping organize a break-in at the DNC at the Watergate in June of 1972. Upon the discovery of the break-in, those in close operation with Nixon faced the various charges from committing and covering up the crimes that became known as the Watergate scandal. It is an undisputed fact that Charles Colson participated in defaming Ellsberg by hiring E. Howard Hunt to find slanderous information on him. Some people believe Colson should not plead guilty in the Ellsberg trial’s charges, while others feel he should plead guilty. Colson should plead guilty to the Ellsberg trial’s charges given three reasons: it dismisses Colson’s …show more content…

He demonstrates his repentance when he pleads guilty to the crimes he committed-- despite his attorney’s urging him not to do so. Furthermore, while imprisoned, Colson places all trust into God to lead him into doing what is right. Colson initially struggles keeping his self-reliance and pride at bay, but by the time he serves his seven month sentence, he understands complete faith in God is of the utmost significance. Similarly, his prison time exhibits the power of prayer. Colson and fellow Christian inmates spend hours begging Christ to lay his healing hand upon Cecil Barnes, who was suffering from an unyielding fever amongst other numerous afflictions. Then, the very day after the prayer session, Barnes awakes feeling good as

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of President Harding

146 Words | 1 Pages

Mr.Doheny bribed Albert a total of $100,000 for the land in Elk Hills, California. Mr.Sinclair bribed Secretary Falls for a total of $300,000 for the Teapot Dome, Wyoming oil reserve. Mr.Falls resigned from his position, but was later found guilty of the

Read More

How Did President George Washington's Use Of Executive Privilege

185 Words | 1 Pages

George Washington refused to share documents related to a military expedition against Native Americans. Congress had demanded White House records and testimony from his staff. Washington met with his Cabinet and together they agreed the president had the authority to refuse Congress — in the public interest. So began the use of executive privilege. Every president, in some form, has invoked executive privilege.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Fred Kaplan's Killing Conspiracy

693 Words | 3 Pages

The assassination of former president John F. Kennedy was a tragic event that left citizens across the United States in grief, shock, and disbelief. The tragedy became the subject of controversy as speculations of a political conspiracy involving the CIA, the Mafia, or the Soviet Union surround the assassination. Some people began to distrust and criticize the Warren Commission’s report of the investigation of events regarding Kennedy’s death. Some conspiracy theorists assert that the assassination was not the act of a lone gunman as reported, and they cite evidence in the theories of the “magic bullet” and the grassy knoll. Fred Kaplan, a journalist, refutes these prominent conspiracy theories in his article “Killing Conspiracy.”

Read More

I Want Constantine's Murderer To Die Analysis

612 Words | 3 Pages

I Want Constantine’s Murderer to Die Olga Polites Newsweek In the article “I Want Constantine’s Murderer to Die”, Olga Polites received a call from her sister-in-law informing Olga that her husbands 22-year-old cousin had been murdered, which, in turn, made her question her formerly unwavering stance on capital punishment. Summary

Read More

Jonathan Wayne Nobles Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

First, Jonathan W. Nobles was sentenced to death row. His crime? He had murdered two people in cold blood. Now, he is in prison awaiting his punishment. In prison, he starts out aggressive, violent, and out of control to get attention.

Read More

Comparing All The President's Men And The Watergate Scandal

850 Words | 4 Pages

When it first happened, the Watergate break-in manifested

Read More

Randy Weaver Primary Sources

1080 Words | 5 Pages

These shortcomings included initial inadequacies in utilizing negotiating personnel, communicating with FBI Headquarters, documenting decisions and securing the site. During and after the crisis, the crime scenes were searched by many law enforcement officials under the direct supervision of the FBI. They found the FBI's handling of the crime scene searches to be inadequate including its failure to use basic crime scene techniques in collecting evidence. Furthermore, the general disorganization and inexperience of some of the participants coupled with inaccuracies in the searches adversely affected the prosecution and contributed to the negative impression of the government generated during the trial. We found no evidence that these deficiencies were intentional or that the FBI staged evidence for the prosecution's benefit.”

Read More

Jfk Assassination Conspiracy Theory

942 Words | 4 Pages

It’s the year 1976, the United States Senate has just called for a new inquiry into the infamous assassination of President John F. Kennedy, who was shot in 1963 during his own motorcade in Dallas, TX while running for re-election. The CIA along with the FBI were coaxed into releasing new documents on Lee Harvey Oswald, and individuals who had not given evidence previously were persuaded to come forward. Pieces of evidence such as sound recordings and photographs were being subjected to scientific research analysis using more modern equipment. In 1979 the House Select Committee on Assassinations, or (HCSA), finally came to a verdict that Lee Harvey Oswald shot three times at the president; one of which, hitting his head and killing him. It was also concluded that a fourth shot was taken from ‘the grassy knoll’, which was something that was contradicting to the statement given by the Warren Commission 16 years earlier.

Read More

Why Is The Conspiracy Trial Of 1741 Guilty

1537 Words | 7 Pages

Mariam Saif History of the United States Professor Zachary Bennett October 6, 2015 Paper 1 Final Draft Blame it on the Guilt It was once said that “a guilty conscience does not need an accuser”, that a man who has wronged someone does not need to be told so and no matter how much he consciously denies it, his mind knows. This is exactly the case when it comes to the New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741. There has been much speculation through the years on these trials and whether or not there ever was a conspiracy to overthrow the white supremacists, but sadly, there hasn’t been a single strand of evidence. In fact, the only facts that we have when it comes to this case is that there is no facts; everything is speculation.

Read More

President Nixon's Injustice In The Oval Office

139 Words | 1 Pages

In front of a grand jury, many of President Nixon’s assistants testified that Nixon taped secretly every conversation that occurred in the Oval Office . Therefore, a Special Prosecutor filed a motion of subpoena duces tecum to obtain the tapes and documents from Nixon. However, Nixon in order to avoid relinquishing the tapes claimed an executive privilege. President Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to fire Archibald Cox, but they refused and resigned to show disapproval. They promised Congress that they would not interfere.

Read More

Should Executive Privilege Be Absolute

546 Words | 3 Pages

Should the Executive Privilege Be Absolute In United States, the Executive Privilege played a positive role on the president in domestic and foreign policy decisions, defend national interests and the protection of national defense secrets. However, this privilege can be abused by the president and executive members as well in seizing power, even provide legal basis to disguise their illicit activities at the White House. In my point of view, I think the executive privilege should not be absolute due to lack of transparency and supervision on the matter of personal interest and national security. As the strongest nation across the global, the president and members of the executive of the United States has the power to conduct a number of operations or information in secret and the executive privilege grants them to resist some legislative and branches of government for disclosing those communications if would potentially interfere the functions of executive branch (Legal Information Institute).

Read More

Was Ford Justified In Pardoning Nixon

628 Words | 3 Pages

On June 17, 1972, Democratic Party’s National Committee offices were broken into by Watergate burglars, assumed former President Richard Nixon. The coverup of the scandal made by Nixon resulted to further investigations and assumptions that led to the impeachment of Nixon. Amid to the scandal, Nixon resigned for “the interest of the Nation must always come before any personal considerations “ (PBS). As President, it is their duty and responsibility to make decisions for their citizens and country, those in which are hard to conclude. Although Nixon should be equally treated like any other citizen accused of violating the law, President Ford entirely justified in pardoning Nixon.

Read More

The Burglars In The Watergate Scandal

323 Words | 2 Pages

On June 17, 1972 there were five burglars arrested inside of the Office of the Democratic National Committee, which is located in the watergate building in Washington D.C. The robbers were caught trying to wiretap phones and steal secret documents. It turns out that the robbers are connected to Nixon’s reelection campaign. They weren’t sure if Nixon was connected to the burglary, but he attempted to cover it up. For example, he raised “hush money” for the burglars, he destroyed evidence, fired uncooperative staff members.

Read More

Hester Prynne And Arthur Dimmesdale In The Scarlet Letter

696 Words | 3 Pages

Is there no reality in the penitence thus sealed and witnessed by good works?” She now tells him that his deeds and actions are real, so they must be helping these people. In her words, his sin is being overshadowed by his works. All of these comforting do nothing and Dimmesdale guilt

Read More

The Negative Impact Of Vietnam War On American People

765 Words | 4 Pages

The Vietnam War was a war the United States should have never been involved in. The “Domino Theory” was a direct cause of the war. The war resulted in much death; innocent civilians and young Americans were killed. The Vietnam war also resulted in rioting, distrust for the United States government, and the loss of many lives. 58,000 Americans were killed and 300,000 were wounded.

Read More

More about Charles Colson Should Plead Guilty For Ellsberg Trial

Open Document