Nixon was one of a few suitable contender for the assignment. The decision comes about place Nixon in the White House however under unfavorable conditions. The outsider competitor George Wallace left Nixon with just 43 percent of the vote, scarcely a prevalent command. Nixon never enhanced his powerless political position. 1972 triumph over George McGovern with 59.7 percent of the vote and furnished him with the support of the "Silent Majority" or "Middle America".
First of all, let us look over what circumstances caused the Nixon vs. Condon case to reach the court. In 1927, the Supreme Court flattened the Texas law which prevented black people from taking part in the Democratic primary election of Texas, in the Nixon v. Herndon case. Not soon after that decision was made, the Texas Legislature removed the old law and substituted it for a new law. This new statute called for every single political party from that point on to "in its own way determine who shall be qualified to vote or otherwise participate in such political
In time, the burglars hired under Nixon 's control revealed the truth about their wrongful conduct for the sake of avoiding harsh punishments. Nixon was asked to step down numerous times, but disregarded the requests of many. John Dean kept notes regarding the president 's malicious, wrongful conduct, which he revealed in front of the Senate Watergate Commmitee. A White House employee disclosed that recordings complete with all of Nixon 's Oval Office conversations were acquirable in 1973. Nixon fought against the committee in an effort to keep his precious tapes out of the public eye.
Most say Richard Nixon is one of the most interesting political figures of the 20th century. Nixon began his long political career in 1947 when he was elected to the House of Representatives. During the course of his presidential campaign, Senator George McGovern had complained about the various number of “dirty tricks” performed by members of the Nixon administration during the campaign. Nixon resulted in ordering aides to harass Democratic party leaders. The Attorney General Mitchell would later call these “dirty tricks” the “White House horrors.”
The Nixon presidency is one of the most unusual public offices held in the United Sates because despite his popularity with the Republicans he still resigned his post and left the public eye. Nixon's speech was emotionally charged and really showcased Nixon's public speaking talents. Nixon addressed the people in a speech on September, twenty third nineteen fifty-two when he was a senator in the state of California. Nixon had been accused of stealing money that had been gifted to him for his campaign. The speech lasted a half an hour and in this half an hour he defended himself and defended the fact that he was innocent of what he was being accused of by his opponents.
One of the powers in question is the president’s power to executive privilege, and define what is to be evidence that could potentially breach national security. I understand that this is an appropriate power for a president of a major country, that has friends as well as foes, whose intentions are to be accounted for. But how President Nixon deemed his recordings to be possibly harmful to national security, was visibly contradictory to what the power was meant to
In 1971, Richard Nixon attempted to improve relations between the United States and the Soviet Union. This period in history is known as détente, which is the French word meaning release from tension. In the end of the 1980’s, relations between the U.S. and Soviet Union were freezing, which led to few economic transactions, exchanges of hostel words and gowning concerns from citizens (both U.S. and Soviets) about their countries’’ military completion. It was clear the détente was slowly collapsing (Njølstad P. 135). There were main five factors that lead to the collapse of the détente, lack of mutual trust, absence of common values and visions, no real economic interdependence, mutual lack of restraint, and victim to the dynamics of the arms
President Richard Nixon invaded Cambodia after saying he would bring peace to southeast Asia. He went back on his word when he decided to do just that. He said in his speech that he wanted to drive out the Vietnamese forces and destroy their supplies in hopes of stopping the war from expanding. He also said that this is the future of 18 million in south vietnam and 7 million in cambodia.
One of Nixon’s objectives he wanted to focus on while running for reelection was to have a forceful crack down on crime. Ironically, to carry out with his other ideals, he used wire-tapping, burglary, and cover-ups. “To Nixon and is closest aids, the burglary seemed commonplace because such behavior fell within familiar patterns of activities they already had established. ”(21) Nixon would do anything to get elected. “Nixon’s drove for reelection exhibited the same characteristic that had shaped his approach in other aspects of his administration: concern about public image [and] desire for knowledge about the plans and activities of the opponents.”
Nixon impacted the image of the U.S. presidency in many ways. Richard Nixon did accomplish some good while in presidency however he also performed illegal actions. His wrongdoings completely obscured his greatness, and he was remembered as the only President to resign instead of facing impeachment. As Vice President, he would travel wherever he was needed, and he continued this devoted mentality into his presidential terms (Oates, 338). As President Nixon restored a relationship with China and accomplished the first major arms agreement with the Soviet Union.
Following the Watergate Scandal of 1972, a subpoena was filed by the Special Prosecutor representing the United against President Nixon and those associated with him, ordering the release of tape recordings from meetings between the President and his cabinet that were believed to contain incriminating material of which would confirm or at least provide evidence supporting the claims of White House involvement in the scandal. Nixon refused to comply with the demand, citing protection through the executive privileges granted to the office of president by way of Article II of the United States Constitution, which enable Executive officials to withhold any information or material from the court based upon their sole discretion. Nixon’s refusal
What is even more dishonorable, is that Nixon had secret tapes that he secretly recorded with 3,700 hours of meetings and calls in executive offices. These tapes were the fault of the entire scandal, which was detrimental to Nixon’s presidency. Nixon refused to turn them over and eventually handing over edited transcripts of the tapes. In order to hide the incriminating evidence, Nixon compulsively lied throughout the whole predicament to the press and to the people of America-even the government. Eventually, Nixon handed over the tapes as commanded by the US Supreme Court.
In 1970, President Richard Nixon, in response to the drug use coupled with the hippie counterculture of the late 1960s, signed the Controlled Substance Act (CSA) which enacted a method of classifying drugs by categorizing them into five schedules, schedule one considered to be the most dangerous. Shortly following this act, in June of 1971, Nixon declared “The War On Drugs”, famously naming drugs and drug abuse “Public enemy number one”. (History.com, 2016). Following Nixon’s presidency, many presidents and administrations, including Reagan, Bush, and Clinton, have continued the support for The War on Drugs, but where are the results? It seems today that the abuse of drugs is worse than ever before.
All of this deceit only made Nixon viewed as dishonest and shady to the American people, making his impeachment seem almost predictable. But something that was not predicted was Richard Nixon’s
Some weaknesses exist in their theory that the Court should take into account are Dworkin's theory to political and moral controversies is his defense of the judicial philosophy of the Warren Court against Richard Nixon and other critics. Dworkin starts by insisting that a distinction be drawn between which decision is required by strict adherence to the text of the Constitution and which decision is required by a political philosophy that takes a strict view of the moral rights that individuals have against society. With respect to the first position, Dworkin is willing to be labeled a strict constructionist but thinks that it in the second sense is quite mistaken since it requires that rights be limited to those recognized at a fixed date
