Charles Krauthammer The Moon We Left Behind Analysis

A Critique of Charles Krauthammer’s “The Moon We Left Behind”

In 2009, President Obama’s decision to halt mission trips to the moon until 2020 sparked a response from Charles Krauthammer. Charles Krauthammer is an American columnist, author, political commentator, and physician. The New Yorker was born in 1950. He is a Pulitzer Prize Winner. The article was titled “The Moon We Left Behind”. In his article, Charles Krauthammer, recalls the astonishing accomplishment of traveling to the moon by American astronauts in 1969. Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon on July 20, 1969. This was the first American voyage to the moon. The Russians had already

His level of curiosity is peaked as elaborates on the historic accomplishments dating back to Kitty Hawk in 1903. This recollection shows how far off the ground to the moon that man has traveled. The distinct distant explains the levels of exploration done by humans. His desire for man to return to the moon is evident. He spoke of the outcomes of NASA’s findings. His opposition of President Obama’s decision is clearly seen in the article. Secondly, he elaborations on his opinion using sarcasm. His focus points include the desire for human explorations, the expenses that will be used for the expeditions, and the fact that Americans will behind other countries if we don’t return to the

He speaks about a subject of great importance and his facts can be proven, however his tactics are distasteful. His comparisons have little if any vility. My rebuttal to the article can be considered as partial. I don’t entirely agree when he compares the thrill to explore verses the need to resolve poverty in America. Poverty on earth needs to be equally addressed. Today, forty-six million Americans live in poverty. As long, as human life exit so will problems, not necessary poverty. This is a much simpler contrast. Poverty may be resolved one day. Problems are solvable when ample effort is given to a situation. Krauthammer stated that himself, when he discussed the proposition given by President Kennedy. The distasteful sarcastic comparison was an effort to make readers understand his opposition of the President’s decision. I agree with the author’s ambitious desires for exploration and adventure. Mankind was born with a creative and challenging brain. The human brain is the most complex object in the universe. The brain is hard-wired and the desire to explore never leaves a person. Why kill the desire to discover the unknown? Why limit intellectual capacity of a human brain to Earthly voyages? His statements about America falling behind other countries has some truth. The truth is only when it comes to visiting the moon and outer space. This competitive statement was injected to fuse the reader’s mindset and cause the audience to side