ipl-logo

Cherokee Treaty Pros And Cons

181 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Injustices of native americans

Whereas twenty-one Cherokees signed away all the Cherokee land east of the Mississippi river without any of Cherokee Council having signed the document or even having taken part in the drafting of the treaty, we the Cherokee Nation Are asking for a review of the circumstances of the treaty.

This Treaty of New Echota was engineered by one John Ridge and supported by John F. Schimmerhorn is not supported by the Majority of the Cherokee Peoples. The monetary offering of $4.5 million to leave Georgia peacefully however generous, will not benefit the Cherokee Nation but will most likely fill the pockets of the drafters of this treaty.

I am aware of the injustice of United States policy toward my people and hold out the hope that America's
Show More
Related
703 Words | 3 Pages

The Louisiana Purchase The Louisiana Purchase was land in North America owned by the French and bought by the United States. Thomas Jefferson the current president in 1803 along with other U.S. ministers, negotiated with France for the purchase of the Louisiana territory. Not everyone agreed with the purchase since the U.S. was already in national debt; yet the buying of the Louisiana territory had more pros than cons. Once the territory joined the U.S., it would expand the USA land by twice its original size.

Read More
185 Words | 1 Pages

Stand Watie was born at Oothcaloga in the Cherokee Nation, Georgia on December 12, 1806. Stand Watie 's name in the Cherokee Nation was De gata ga, which means "he stands. " Watie was also known by other aliases, such as Isaac S. Watie. As a young boy he attended Moravian Mission School at Springplace Georgia, and moved on to serve as a clerk of the Cherokee Supreme Court and Speaker of the Cherokee National Council.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Having ratified the Adams-Onís Treaty in 1821, the United States officially purchased Florida from Spain. Taking control, American officials concluded the Treaty of Moultrie Creek two years later which established a large reservation in central Florida for the Seminoles. By 1827, the majority of the Seminoles had moved to the reservation and Fort King (Ocala) was constructed nearby under the guidance of Colonel Duncan L. Clinch. Though the next five years were largely peaceful, some began to call for the Seminoles to be relocated west of the Mississippi River. This was partially driven by issues revolving around the Seminoles providing sanctuary for escaped slaves.

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

Many Americans believed that the Indian Removal Act would be a series of treaty making with the Native Americans, to form alliances and give them the land that the Americans didn’t believe the US would ever extend to, and the original Supreme Court ruling in 1831 also invalidated Cherokee sovereignty over their land. However, the Indian Removal Act quickly became an excuse for Jackson’s tantrum over the Supreme Court’s second ruling in 1832, which confirmed Cherokee sovereignty in 1832. Though the US believed that they had owned the land, the Cherokee had been there for much longer and held the rights to the land. The US also did not have the legal right to the land though they had the treaty because the treaty had been signed by renegade Cherokee who believed in relocation, not by the actual government of the Cherokee Nation. Chief John Ross argued that it had been made illegally, but it was ratified by a single vote and signed by Jackson.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

The Choctaws, Mississippi's largest Indian group, were the first southeastern Indians to accept removal with the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek in September 1830. The treaty provided that the Choctaws would receive land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for the remaining Choctaw lands in Mississippi. In the winter of 1830, Choctaws began migrating to Indian Territory along the "Trail of tears. " The westward migrations continued over the following decades, and Indians remaining in Mississippi were forced to flee their communal land-holdings in return for small individually owned allotments.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

The Cherokee tribe say if they stay that the laws they would have to live under would ruin the Cherokee people. In the text written by the Cherokee they say, “even though we love the land of our fathers, we believe that moving will be far better than giving into the laws of the states. If we stay we will witness the ruin of the Cherokee people.” this means that even though the Cherokee loved their land they would rather leave than stay and be under the laws of the United States. The Cherokee nation cannot be re-established in the middle of the white men.

Read More
116 Words | 1 Pages

The Cherokee people may see the light of self-government, because this document noted that the Cherokee Indians, as a nation, owning the distinct sovereign powers. It stated that the Cherokee people had rights to manage their own territory and the citizens of Georgia had no right to enter without the assent of the Cherokees. The cause of this case was that Worcester claimed that the forced removal of his family was a violation of the constitutional right. The document indicated that the tribes were under the protection of the federal government and the tribal people could not be removed from the land. So this case was in favor of the Indians and they would support it.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

In 1838, the Cherokees were forced to give up their lands and to migrate to present-day Oklahoma, due to the signing of The Treaty of New Echota. The Cherokees were deported from their homes, betrayed by the government whom they treated with respect, separated them from their land that they nurtured; the Cherokee struggled to understand how to make a new life. The Indian Removal led to thousands of Cherokees to die due to starvation, diseases, and exhaustion during their march known as The Trail of Tears. This paper will discuss the effects it had on the Cherokees and what has happened during the trail.

Read More
173 Words | 1 Pages

The Iroquois was a religion that wanted peace throughout the five tribes. The peacemaker believed that the five tribes must follow his laws of peace, to keep the peace between the five tribes. He wanted to the tribes be a peaceful and united religion. The five tribes had agreed with him also. So they made a law called the Great Peace, it was made to let peace flow through the five tribes.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

When the Europeans began colonizing the New World, they had a problematic relationship with the Native Americans. The Europeans sought to control a land that the Natives inhabited all their lives. They came and decided to take whatever they wanted regardless of how it affected the Native Americans. They legislated several laws, such as the Indian Removal Act, to establish their authority. The Indian Removal Act had a negative impact on the Native Americans because they were driven away from their ancestral homes, forced to adopt a different lifestyle, and their journey westwards caused the deaths of many Native Americans.

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

In the letter, the Cherokee nation addresses several reason on why they should not have to move. One reason is that the new land if foreign to them. They are being expected to pack up, leave everything they know, and move to the unknown. Another reason to add on to the above is that there are other Native American tribe already

Read More
98 Words | 1 Pages

Indigenous tribes that live in forests and depend on them to sustain their way of life are irreparably damaged. It forces them out of their home causing many tribes to go extinct or lose their traditional way of life. -Riverside towns and cities are effected when forest cover is lost, and runoff rapidly flows into streams. This elevates river levels and subjects downstream villages, cities, and agricultural fields to flooding. -The runoff from fields and factories may carry other man-made pollutants into water supplies, making it impossible to drink or bath in the water, forcing people to move

Read More
181 Words | 1 Pages

The Cherokee Tribe The Cherokee Indians referred to them selves Ani-Yunwiya witch means Principal People. Nobody really knows why their tribes name is Cherokee, people think that it comes from Choctaw witch means mountain people. There are two main theories of Cherokee origins. One is that the Cherokee, an Iroquoian-speaking people, are relative latecomers to Southern Appalachia, who may have migrated in late prehistoric times.

Read More
130 Words | 1 Pages

The relationship between the Cherokee and the United States has changed over time. When America was first founded, the Americans wanted the Cherokee's land. The Cherokees were forced to leave by the U.S. Army. My evidence from Readworks.org is " In the 1830s, in a famous event know as the Trail of Tears, the United States Army forced the Cherokee to march to Oklahoma." This shows that Cherokee were forced to move.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

Ranging from the south Alleghenies mountain range all the way down to the south of Georgia and far west of Alabama, lived the Cherokee Indians. They were a powerful detached tribe of the Iroquoian family and were commonly called Tsaragi which translates into "cave people. " This tribe was very prominent in what is now called the U.S, but over time has been split up or run out of their land because of social or political encounters with the new settlers from Europe. Despite the dispersion or the split amongst this tribe, they still obtained their core religious beliefs, practices and ceremonies. Their detailed belief system, fundamental beliefs, significant meanings, and their connection to song and dance make up their religious system.

Read More

More about Cherokee Treaty Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document