Chris McCandless, also known as "Alexander Supertramp," was a young man who became widely known after his death in the Alaskan wilderness in 1992. His story has been the subject of many books, documentaries, and films, and is often debated whether he was a hero or a fool. McCandless grew up in a well-to-do family, graduated from Emory University, and had a promising future. However, he had a deep desire to escape society and live off the land. He gave away his possessions, including his savings, and set out on a journey that would ultimately lead to his death. There are several reasons why McCandless can be seen as a fool. First, he was unprepared for the harsh Alaskan wilderness. He lacked proper gear, supplies, and training. He didn't bring a map or a compass, and he didn't have any experience living off the land. His lack of …show more content…
He was known for taking unnecessary risks, such as hitchhiking with strangers and eating wild plants without proper identification. His lack of caution put him in dangerous situations that could have been avoided. Third, McCandless was selfish in his actions. He left his family and friends behind without any explanation, causing them great pain and suffering. He also put rescuers in danger when they tried to save him, as they had to navigate the treacherous Alaskan terrain to reach him. Despite these reasons, some people argue that McCandless was a hero. They see him as a symbol of freedom, courage, and the pursuit of a meaningful life. They admire his determination to live off the land and his rejection of materialism and societal norms. However, McCandless's story should serve as a cautionary tale. While it's admirable to seek adventure and to live life on your terms, it's also important to be prepared, responsible, and mindful of others. McCandless's lack of preparation and consideration for others led to his tragic end, and he should not be idolized as a hero for these