Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

816 Words4 Pages

MyAccess #3 The beginning idea of Civil Disobedience can be taken in many different directions. Some immediately think of Thoreau, others have little knowledge of him and what he had done to set the image of Civil Disobedience in our world today. Nevertheless, Thoreau did a great amount for the standard of Civil Disobedience, even as of today it shows through in our society. This is quite remarkable considering that he lived in the years of 1817-1862, which is approximately 150 years ago. Yes, this is a very long time for us to imagine, but for Thoreau’s ideas and concepts of Civil Disobedience that is an extremely long time. When looking at Thoreau’s infamous ideas on “Civil Disobedience” there are many aspects inspiring to us still today. …show more content…

Diction is just simply the choice of words. Which seems so simple, but when really considering Thoreau’s writings it stands out and is still evaluated today. Thoreau’s writing style in “Civil Disobedience” was one of the harder to depict. Thoreau was seen as the most iconoclastic square peg of all authors. And it is almost impossible to shove his works into a formal verses conversational stylistic comparison. If someone was asked to depict Thoreau’s writing style in “Civil Disobedience” in one word, after a session of struggle, he would finally come up with something close to vigorous. Meaning that Thoreau’s writings were very strenuous or spirited. When looking at his text overall, his diction would be considered an aggressive or powerful