Civil Rights Pros And Cons

1111 Words5 Pages

Safa 1
Mohamad Safa Professor Sherry Sharifian GOVT 2305-71013 28 September 2017 I) PART 1:
Civil rights are essentially born with citizens of a country. Nobody can take those rights from a citizen. Those rights give the citizen an opportunity to access to certain freedom entitled by law. Civil rights consist of the capacity to give equal treatment to all citizens in term of employment, housing, public accommodations and more. Civil rights are a protection from any unfair treatment to the individuals because of their race, color skin or physic. In the American history, Civil rights movements played a big role to establish equality between black and white people in the American society. Black people were deprived of a lot of liberties, so they …show more content…

As explained in the first sentence, those rights are given and can be taken when national security is in danger. Liberty of an individual stops when the liberty of other begins. Citizen are free to speak to defend themselves, but when they say something harmful for the national security or social environment, they then can be stopped by the government. For example, if somebody screams in a crowded theatre place, fire, chaos will then run everywhere. This person will then be stopped because of his words. His words represent danger for all the people present in the theatre …show more content…

Civil liberties cases concern a bigger size of the population living in the American society, in contrast to civil right cases, where a very small group of individual or even only one individual is involved in the case. Civil liberties cases are usually a concern about some changes in the rule of the country, where a big group of individuals will be affected by the decision held in the supreme court. Civil right cases are not concerning any change in rules or country organization, it is just the life of one or small group of people involved into