Cognitivism In Human Life

The impact of cognitivism in society has change the lifestyle in human life. For example, in education most of the school shift away from teaching method and towards the freedom of students to choose what type of learning that suits them. Curriculum become more flexible with continuous assessment, group based learning and applied practice into the learning experience. Cognitivism did impact on certain behaviours, but mainly in theory thinking and modelling the mental structures which process so that could explain human behaviour. “Cognitivism did not reject behaviourist science altogether but shifted the emphasis form processes could promote effective learning”. (Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies, 49). Now human live

In human mind, cognitivism tends to rise form unhappiness with various behaviour or actions in human life. This will make human to act without thinking what they have actually done. Happiness, sadness, fear, anger, and others effect on human cognitive perspective mind. While these feelings can be manifested, sometimes human tend to expressed in everlasting variety of emotions. This is why human tending to think twice when emotions comes, for example love, woman tends to think more than one objective than man because woman tend to get emotion quicker than man. In the psychology terms or psychology study, behaviourism has a connection in psychology. The meaning of behaviourism is based on the word of personality. The word personality is from the word persona which mean mask. This term is to describe the behaviour, character or personal of a person in the manifestation of everyday life bringing. The term behaviour refers to anything a person does, typically in response to internal or external

Compliance and obedience is the act of asking someone to do or behave in a certain way. Both of these factors are by far very different though both have the same objective which is asking people to act in the ways that they want. As mentioned by Saundra and J. Noland (2015), “There is a difference between the concepts of compliance, which is agreeing to change one’s behaviour because someone else asks for the change, and obedience, which is changing one’s behaviour at the direct order of an authority figure.” (p. 497). For the example of compliance and obedience, when a person is driving along the road, he sees someone by the roadside who is signalling him to stop the car and he notices that the person is his friend. After a moment of thinking, he then decides to stop his car. In the case of obedience, if that someone he sees is a police officer, then he will have no choice besides to stop his car. To demonstrate how this can affect the society, blind obedience will be an example. A person of authority can command a group of persons to do bad deeds only for the sake of his or her own benefit. Sometimes or even almost most of the time, people follow the authorities without ever evaluating the actions and plus with the words of promises that are given by the authority, promises that they will benefit from their actions though it can hurt or the deed itself are really morally wrong. This can