Since the settlement of colonial American and the migration of individuals from different ethnicities and backgrounds, the United States of America has been as a melting pot. After the immigration of former Europeans, to colonial Americans, citizens felt displaced with the lack of national identity from 1810 to 1840. Politically, the United States lacked a problem of representation within their government. As former members of Great Britain, Americans were only aware of what they did not want, a monarchy, which led to their dismissal. Voting, Americans could not justify a system that allowed everyone to feel satisfied with. In particular, New Jersey, allocated the plan of one vote per state, which worked for their substantially smaller population …show more content…
McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohen v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden all served great significance to judicial nationalism due to their American legal system impact. The court case of McCulloch v. Maryland was caused due to the dispute between Maryland and the federal government regarding the constitutionality of a tax on the Bank of the United States (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826 lecture). It was determined that the creation of a national bank was an implied power, through the Necessary and Proper Clause. With this expression of power, the state of Maryland was unable to interfere, resulting in the affirmed supremacy of federal laws over state powers (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826 lecture). The McCulloch v. Maryland court case allowed for the priniciple of implied powers to settle in, extending the meaning of federal authority within the United States. In the case of Cohen v. Virginia, the case concerned the legality of lottery tickets, between the state of Virginia, and a private citizen, Cohen. With the influence of the Supreme Court, it was deemed that the Supreme Court had appellate jurisdiction over state court cases when federal questions were involved, leading to the dedicison that federal judiciary possessed the power to review and overturn court decisions made by state courts (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826). This process was established as the prinicple of judicial review. In the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, a dispute occurred between two individuals, Gibbons and Ogden, both steamboat operators. The dispute arose over the usage of waterways between the states of New York and New Jersey. It was decided by the Supreme Court that Congress possessed exclusive power in order to regular interstate commerce, which was protected by the Commerce Clause. The Constitution’s Commerce Clause demonstrated that itwas unconstituaional for