ipl-logo

Colonialism And Imperialism In The 1500's And Early 1900s

946 Words4 Pages

In the 1500s, much land had yet to be discovered. This was a big deal because it meant anyone could colonize the land. You just had to get to it first. The land had a lot of new things like new resources, new trade routes, and new people that lived there. Colonization and imperialism were significant because of all the new opportunities they gave people. The Three main forces most responsible for the colonialism and imperialism that occurred throughout the 1500s and early 1900s were economic, social, and nationalism.
Economics was essential to every kind of civilization because no matter what, people would always need resources to survive and flourish. New land meant more resources and maybe even new resources. If a country that was running …show more content…

It meant their country could be revived because they could expand their country and find new resources to use or trade. Finding a new aid was perfect because it meant you had something that no one else did and could trade it for things to make your country stronger. The Treaty of Tordesillas was an agreement between Spain and Portugal that divided The Americas between them. This was important because it meant Spain or Portugal could explore their part of The New World. The two countries found many resources like iron ore, copper, and nickel. This was very good for them because they could trade these resources with other countries and get back even more. The Treaty of Tordesillas is still a factor today, like how the Latin American nations speak Spanish except for Brazil, where they speak Portuguese. This is because Brazil was on the Portuguese side of the …show more content…

Alliances could help in wars, and having a reliable trading partner was good. Alliances are a form of being social for a country. Being social was very important because it could be the difference between winning or losing a war or having a dying or thriving country. Document 4 talks about the survival of the fittest, competition, and ruthlessness between countries. However, this could be resolved by more social interactions. If countries were more social, they could work together and help each other without losing anything. In World War Two, when Germany invaded Poland, France, and Britain declared war on Germany because they had a relationship with Poland. Later, America joined to help Poland during the war because of its alliance with France. If France, Britain, and America did not come to help Poland, the results of World War two could have been very different. Alliances are critical because sometimes, a country needs help. Alliances do not have to fight to help the other country; they can send resources and supplies the country might be running low on. They could give the soldiers safe passage if they needed to go through the country. If countries were not social with each other, then many significant events could have ended in many different ways, causing today to be very

Open Document