ipl-logo

Commercial Whaling In Iceland

845 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Positive And Negative Impacts Of Whaling

Therefore, the assorted governmental institutions that characterize the states of Iceland, Norway, and Denmark exemplify the differing political sectors of each country despite the states’ considerably interwoven histories, and ultimately portray how the countries’ respective governments influence their policies and participation in the environmentally controversial practice of commercial whaling.
I. The Kingdom of Norway’s constitutional monarchy, which adopted its constitution in 1814 (“Norway”) demonstrates several unique governmental and characteristics that pervade the state’s executive, legislature, and judicial branches, all of which contribute to Norway’s continued involvement in its historical commercial whaling practice.
A. Norwegian …show more content…

Historical
a. Iceland permitted Norway to construct whaling bases in Iceland in 1883
(“History of Whaling”).
1. After practically exhausting the Icelandic whale stocks, Norway transferred its whaling operations to the Arctic circle: a move that proved to be incredibly lucrative. 2. The Icelandic whale populations had been nearly decimated by Norway’s whaling activities, and “by 1915, about 17,000 whales had been slaughtered”
(“History of Whaling”), thus prompting a national ban on whaling in
Norwegian whaling in Iceland, though that statute was repealed “in 1928, when it was believed that the populations had recovered” (“History of
Whaling”).
ii. Modern continuance
a. Following the implementation of the International Whaling Commission’s moratorium on commercial whaling in 1982, Norway filed a complaint in opposition to the moratorium, thus allowing Norwegian commercial whaling to persist under the guise of “scientific whaling.”
II. The Kingdom of Denmark’s constitutional monarchy, which adopted its constitution in 1953 (“Denmark”) employs a similar monarch and Prime Minister coexistence to Norway, though Denmark’s separation of powers differs starkly from that of its Scandinavian counterparts and from Europe as a …show more content…

2. Hereditary position
b. Head of government: Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen
1. Supervises the Danish cabinet
2. Any power to be exercised by the Prime Minister must first be bestowed upon them by the Danish monarch.
3. Maintains power persistently unless dismissed by the executive branch ii. Legislative
a. Denmark’s legislature consists of the unicameral People’s Assembly, otherwise known as the Folketing
1. The Folketing consists of 179 seats, including 4 seats for Greenland and the
Faroe Islands (“Legislative Branch”).
2. Members of the Folketing are directly elected in “multi-seat constituencies by [a] proportional representation vote” (“Legislative Branch”).
3. Folketing members serve four-year-terms “unless the Folketing is dissolved earlier” (“Legislative Branch”).
b. The Folketing is currently dominated by The Social Democratic Party of
Denmark, The Danish People’s Party, and The Left parties. iii. Judicial
a. Denmark’s highest court is the Supreme Court
1. Court President
2. Eighteen judges (“Judicial Branch”)
b. Danish judges are “appointed by the monarch upon the recommendation of the
Minister of Justice with the advice of the Judicial Appointments

Show More
Related
521 Words | 3 Pages

Sandra Steingraber is an ecologist and author who writes about the relationship between the environment and human health. Her written work titled “Despair Not” discussed how the murder of an abolitionist connects to the greatly relevant environmental crisis. No, the murder of one man did not ruin the environment, but the author uses this as a metaphor and connection between her personal experiences and current environmental and health issues. This method of persuasive writing has numerous advantages and disadvantages, therefore affecting its credibility. Two Crises, One Cause Steingraber writes that it is the time to face the environmental crisis in the spirit of Elijah Lovejoy.

Read More
2120 Words | 9 Pages

There are also no juries or witnesses and it involves only lawyers from both sides that argue the law and answer any questions the judges may have. There are seven judges at this level or one Chief Justice and six judges on the panel. The Chief Justice is elected by the court?s sitting judges and is elected a two-year term. Cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court that were heard in the Circuit Courts or the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court can override those courts decisions. The Supreme Court?s role is to guarantee a firm and reasonable judicial system and is the final arbitrator in disagreements that involve the state?s constitution and laws.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

Khalil Franklin: Response paper; Murphy, Marshaling the Court: the leadership and bargaining, and the judicial process. Decision-making power of individual justices is shared among them. Given the authority of each individual justice, one must persuade only four of his colleagues, but also to sign on to the majority opinion [see page 2]. To measure political leadership, the role of the chief justice can be studied on the basis of political leadership. Personality spectrum.

Read More
1522 Words | 7 Pages

The representatives are granted the ability to remove a judge immediately if he sees fit. Branches-Branches of the government include prime minister, and legislator. The branches for the court system are municipal, circuit, district, appeals, and supreme

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Article 3 tells us how we establish judges, which is called Judiciary. They also decided if a law is allowable, or if it goes against the constitution. Article three section one states that the Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. That a judge will serve for life or until he or she wants to retires. Article three section two informs us that congress says what case the Supreme Court may decide.

Read More
410 Words | 2 Pages

The legislature is also called the Congress. It’s made up into two parts. The first is the House of Representatives, And the Senate. Executive makes sure the law is carried out. The executive includes both the president and the vice president.

Read More
1514 Words | 7 Pages

The Judicial Branch incorporates the Supreme Court, the most noteworthy court in the United States, as well as other government courts. The judges of the Supreme Court are selected by the president and must be endorsed by Senate. Federal cases, such as Marbury vs. Madison, made the Supreme Court "a separate branch of government on par with Congress and the" executive branch (McBride, 2007, P.1). The motivation behind this case was to affirm the power of the Supreme Court to survey law, to figure out if or not that law is sacred, and to set up the check and offsets. We see these techniques existing today in our nation, in light of the fact that every branch can check the other to keep one branch from turning out to be too intense from the others, as legal over official can pronounce official activities illegal, official over legal can select Supreme Court judges, Legislative over Judicial can change the size of government court framework and the quantity of Supreme Court judges, and so on.

Read More
1450 Words | 6 Pages

and have practiced law as a lawyer, judge, or some combination there for at least four years. Responsibilities include, original jurisdiction in civil actions over $200 or $500, divorce, title to land, contested elections, and contested probate matters. Original jurisdiction in felony criminal matters. The sensitive matter juvenile and 13 district courts are named criminal district court, some others directed to give preference to certain specialized areas. Although the cases in the District Court are more sensitive and lengthier I still believe this court should be elected.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

In this paper I will, Discuss the judicial selection process of my state, choose a second state, and describe the qualifications and the selection

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Secondly, the parliamentary executives, the cabinet minister and the Prime Minister, share responsibilities. Therefore, the parliament is “jointly responsible for the actions of the government…primus inter pares (first among equals)”. (Haywood, 2007, p. 95) Lastly, a typical feature of the parliamentary system is that the offices of the Head of State and the Head of the Government remain separate from each other. Union is a key feature of the parliamentary governments worldwide.

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

Liberal Democracy is a democratic system of government in which individual rights and freedoms are officially recognized and protected, and the exercise of political power is limited by the rule of law. The word democracy is greek, the word “demos” means people and “kratos” means power. The idea of liberalism first began in the 1600’s with John Locke as he believed that the people should be allowed to remove the government currently ruling when they have misused their power for ulterior motives. Although the seed was planted in the 1600’s, liberal democracy only properly took form in the 1840’s in Canada. Australia and New Zealand followed not long after as they began to use the secret ballot system to elect political leaders.

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

The branches of government are: (a) The Legislature: makes the law (The People’s Majlis –Article 5 and Article 70(a)) (b) The Executive: implements the law (The President and the independent commissions –Article 6- ) (c) The

Read More
1658 Words | 7 Pages

Review of Literature Environmental issues began to be discussed and debated only towards the end of the 20th century. Since then significant amount of literature has been penned down raising awareness about issues of pollution, deforestation, animal rights and several others however it has failed to result in major changes, ideas or even actions to save the environment. Several species of animals have become extinct; pollution level is at an all-time high, global warming is leading to severe climate changes all across the globe but these problems do not seem to alarm the decision makers. Leydier & Martin (2013) also states that, “despite the increasing expression of concern in political and media debates about issues such as climate change, pollution and threats to biodiversity, “political ecology” (operating at the confluence of scientific developments, political engagement and ethical debates) is still trying to find its bearings” (p.7). It is quite evident that environmental issues are not treated in equivalence to political, economic, social or even religious issues.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

The highest position in the judiciary of Malaysia is the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Malaysia (also known as the Chief Justice of Malaysia), followed by the President of the Court of Appeal, the Chief Judge of Malaya, and the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak. Our courts structure is divided into superior courts and subordinate courts. The High Court, Court of Appeal and the Federal Court are superior courts, while the Magistrates Court, the Court for Children and the Sessions Court are subordinate courts. A

Read More

More about Commercial Whaling In Iceland

Related Topics

Open Document