When it comes to government I completely agree with Karl Marx’s communist ideals. Having one social class dominate the political and economic system is not quintessential at all in my views. In Marx’s time there was one class, which controlled the modes of production and were known as capitalists. Capitalism is a mode of production based on private ownership. The main goal of capitalists is to produce commodities for the market and it to keep it competitive they must extract the most they can out of their workers and pay them the least they can. This creates class inequity. In this capitalist government the working class gets just enough money to get by so they can work the next day. If you don’t find anything wrong with this you must be sick. …show more content…
In Marx’s eyes it was necessary for the working class people to rise up and make the needed adjustments to society. In the Communist Manifesto Karl Marx was not calling for complete anarchy and abolition of the government, but he did seem concerned about a few aspects of it. One problem for Marx was when it was based on uneven notions of class. Marx advocated for a government that was part of the people—a government that did not completely rely on the principles and revolution inspiring problems class inequity. Although Marx had his differences with the current government he saw it as an opportunity for his party to capitalize on if they could get in power. Marx explains, “The immediate aim of the communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow the bourgeoisie society, conquest of political power” (Marx). With Marx’s ideals of communism on the rise and the working class growing anxious to be something more than the upper class slaves it only made sense for the working class to extinguish the capitalists. We can also say that the communist ideals of Marx wouldn’t exist if John Locke didn’t compose his original theories of functions and rights of