ipl-logo

Communist Manifesto Analysis

467 Words2 Pages

The lust for possession that Locke had addressed had grown even more violent and unbridled for nearly two centuries when Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote The Communist Manifesto. The tools of the Industrial Revolution served as levers for use by the wealthy in the agculumuation of even more wealth. As property and money were squirreled away by individuals, the most greedy of men were born into a more wealthy class of society. Written on the eve of the German Revolution, the manifesto speaks out against the bourgeoisie for it “agglomerated population, centralized the means of production and has concentrated property in a few hands” (p. 40). The greed of this upper tier has grown unbearable and intolerable; the bourgeoisie with its absurd means of manufacturing and …show more content…

The solution for Marx was the absence of social classes as well as the common ownership of the means of production. Communism calls forth an idealistic world where the apples are not picked for one’s own existence but for the wealth of society. One gathers all that they are able and the fruit of their labor belongs to the community; society then distributes the apples needed for survival to each individual. This ideology strives to achieve an equal existence for everyone, as popularized by Karl Marx: “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” The redistribution of wealth extinguishes the danger of possession because both the means of production and the products themselves are controlled by the state. The issues with property, the greed of possession, were not supposed to be possible because citizens would not own anything. But as history reveals, this plan of simply removing the cause fails as soon as it becomes acquainted with reality. Mankind is not a nice race; humans thrive on competition for survival and

Show More
Related

Comparing The Views Of Karl Marx And Andrew Carnegie

1777 Words | 8 Pages

In Smith’s theory, he focused on the individual, but Marx preferred to pay much more attention on a specific social class. Marx says, “The distinguishing feature of Communism is no the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property (Marx, 1848).” For example, proletariat needed to build a new social class through revolution, and abolition of private property needed to be established in society. Marx had also offered other policies that helped to get rid of the different class distinctions between bourgeois and proletariat and distribute the wealth equally such as “abolition of all right of inheritance, exclusion of monopoly, equal liability of all to labor, and a more equable distribution of the population over the country (Marx, 1848).” These policies not only prohibited one to hold certain power and rights to rule others, but they also promoted the equal distribution of wealth in

Read More

Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx: A Comparative Analysis

1595 Words | 7 Pages

Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith and “Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels both address selfishness and its effect on society through social and economic means. In Wealth of Nations, Smith defines wealth as the productivity of a nation and the aspects of a commercial society. “The Communist Manifesto” criticizes the idea behind a capitalist society and talks about the class struggle between the working class and the owners of the means of production. Wealth of Nations and “The Communist Manifesto” both analyze how the selfishness of people affects society, however while Wealth of Nations claims selfishness causes increased productivity and increases wages for all, “The Communist Manifesto” argues that selfishness causes injustice

Read More

Communism During The Salem Witch Trials

732 Words | 3 Pages

While communism is meant to help achieve equality for everyone it has been proven we can’t achieve a perfect communist state. Communism first originated from the Greek idea during the Golden Age that harmony and bliss would be achieved without owning private property (Beer, "Origins of Communism"). Lopez 2 It later than resurfaced around 1848 when Karl Marx published his book The Communist Manifesto. During Karl Marx’s time he wanted the proletariat, the working class, to overthrow the government due to bourgeoisie, the high class, having more opportunities and unfair advantages.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Communist Manifesto

917 Words | 4 Pages

The Communist Manifesto is home to the the Communist Program, a set of measures detailed out by Karl Marx, measures that are required to be enacted to achieve the communist state from the capitalist society. These measures range from radical to reasonable; a few have been modified and adapted into the United States, such as free public education for children. Others seem simply farcical to be applied to a capitalist society, even when aiming for communism. Are these measures truly feasible to be applied in a capitalistic society, or would the populace be too caught up in Capitalism to accept the path set before them? As Capitalism is seen by Marx as an essential stepping stone, despite the potential corruption of the proletariat by the bourgeois, it seems unlikely that a portion of these could be applied; specifically ones concerning radical fiscal measures.

Read More

Communist Manifesto's Ideas

316 Words | 2 Pages

An Analysis of The Communist Manifesto's Ideas In 1848, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote The Communist Manifesto, in which predicted the inevitability of new social order called communism. According to Engels and Marx, this so-called revolution would occur because the working middle class would become aggravated enough to the point where they throw over the upper class as well as the entire political system. The pamphlet explained how a modern government would be changed to a socialist society, then to communism. The whole process seems very appealing, but there are many mishaps or slip-ups that can occur in such a significant change in a community.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More

American Exceptionalism Analysis

1055 Words | 5 Pages

Rather than advocating for the assurance of individual liberties, Marx and Engels argue that the government is justified in increasing its power to the point where their authority overrides personal liberties. Karl Marx says “the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.” He focuses on the clash between classes in society and discusses how one class dominates another, which in the end suppresses individual freedoms. In the age where “the Civil War marked the transformation of an agricultural society into an industrial nation,” Marx saw a move towards capitalism, which he felt led to the exploitation of laborers and argued that Communism could put an end to that. Therefore, this document disproves the idea that unity was the solution to the protection of liberty, but rather argues that the elimination of class distinction would erase oppression among society.

Read More

Communist Manifesto Rhetorical Analysis

354 Words | 2 Pages

Karl Marx discusses in the first section of the The Communist Manifesto about how history mainly consists of class struggles. He explains how there will always be an oppressor and oppressed, where there is an ongoing battle that always ends in ruins or in revolt. He also claims that if there continues to be different classes, the wealthy and ones in poverty, there will never been an end to this conflict over power. Marx believes that if were no classes, there will no longer be strife and everyone would share equal power and wealth. In this prompt, Marx uses allusion, periodic sentences, and cause and effect to support his claim and to apply emphasis to the points he uses.

Read More

John Locke Research Paper

1983 Words | 8 Pages

This ultimately allows Marx to reach the conclusion that society would be better off with no social classes. His political conclusion culminated in the idea that a communistic type government that was very close to anarchy would be ideal. Everyone should have equal pay so that the working class will no longer get exploited (2.12). Capitalism is a type of corruption to a person’s

Read More

Communist Manifesto: A Social Revolution

1203 Words | 5 Pages

When one normally thinks of the Communist Manifesto, you do not think about revolution, especially social revolution. Who would think about that when your mind goes straight to Communism which we associate with bad things? To most, the Communist Manifesto is a work of beliefs that many think are far-fetched and wrong, but what if you read between the lines? The Communist Manifesto talks about Communism but it also talks about the lower social classes overthrowing their current class standings to make way for a newer, better class structure.

Read More

The Communist Manifesto, By Karl Marx

1810 Words | 8 Pages

“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx, Engels 1848) Karl Marx’s theory rests on this foundation explaining that since the beginning of human interaction and society, there has always been a fundamental divide between class interests and goals. Social class can be defined by Karl Marx as societies having been split into two separate groups, those who own the means of productions and those who are the means of production. Marx believed that business owners, or capitalists, had the power to manage wages of workers; therefore, giving owners power over the workers. He believed that this power over workers was a way of manipulation, causing a great divide in social classes. This divide will result

Read More

Class Antagonism In The Communist Manifesto

832 Words | 4 Pages

The Communist Manifesto from the get-go begins with establishing a clear quote "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles". Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich (2014-06-06) Kindle Edition. This quote clearly refers to one main issue that will become clear through out the book, and that is how strong and alive class antagonism was, which simply refers to the division of people. Marx also describes class antagonism as “a group of persons sharing the same relationship to the means of production.” When attempting to oust understand Marx’s stance on communism it is important to understand why he believed that their was so much division and why he believed that anyone in society should have the right to become accomplished in anything one wishes.

Read More

Economic Utopian Revolution Essay

522 Words | 3 Pages

It inevitable struggle between social classes would lead to the creation of a classless society where all means of production would be owned by the community. The idea of Communism is that workers earn wages in the industrial and agricultural sectors. Individual worker rights are secondary to the importance of the state. The government acts as the facilitator for the community and controls all the wealth and there will be not private ownership which means that all the profits that are earned by the workers will return to the community for equal distribution. Marx’s view is to have a classless society.

Read More

Karl Marx And Feudalism

1465 Words | 6 Pages

The ideology of Karl Marx, communism, was the next step of the socialism. Considering the fact that, socialism used to reduce the gap between rich and poor by taking more taxes from rich and helping others, there is a contrast between socialism and communism. Even if it seems like a utopia, communism supports the elimination of economic classes by government and the authors argued on the great possibility of it in the book. In the communist society that was asserted by Karl Marx, all the property should be ruled by the government, thus there would be no upper or lower classes. This book created a reflection in the Europe and in a short passage of time there was a reduce in labor hours, increase in wages and labor unions has been created, which was the association for the protection of rights of proletarian class.

Read More

Karl Marx And Liberal Democracy

1891 Words | 8 Pages

Marx saw capital and liberal democracies as the fundamental reasons for the low standards of living and the low social conditions of workers. Karl Marx in particular is especially concerned with the political assumptions behind these two ideologies. According to him, these two types of government should be replaced by communism, since communism would provide a more equal and socially just society. Although this statement may seem unusual, since we tend to associate communism with Stalin and China, the type of communism implemented in these countries is different from the communism that Marx and Engels envisaged in their Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels’ vision of communism is based on the principle of equality among the people and freedom

Read More

More about Communist Manifesto Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document