The Pros And Cons Of The Communist Manifesto

917 Words4 Pages

The Communist Manifesto is home to the the Communist Program, a set of measures detailed out by Karl Marx, measures that are required to be enacted to achieve the communist state from the capitalist society. These measures range from radical to reasonable; a few have been modified and adapted into the United States, such as free public education for children. Others seem simply farcical to be applied to a capitalist society, even when aiming for communism. Are these measures truly feasible to be applied in a capitalistic society, or would the populace be too caught up in Capitalism to accept the path set before them? As Capitalism is seen by Marx as an essential stepping stone, despite the potential corruption of the proletariat by the bourgeois, it seems unlikely that a portion of these could be applied; specifically ones concerning radical fiscal measures. …show more content…

One of the major clauses geared toward fixing financial inequality that Marx proposed was an “Abolition of all right of inheritance” which would prevent bundles of wealth being passed down through generations without it being fairly earned (490). Filtering the money back into the state seems like a fair solution - no more generational wealth and the state gets additional funding - this poses potential issues and concerns. The abolition of all rights to any amount of inheritance just seems ludicrous. The removal of the right implies that any inheritance, from twenty dollars to multiple millions would be taken by the state. This indiscriminate form of collection is simply a waste of time for the bureaucratic collection agencies that would have to be in