This paragraph is about the description difference between the main characters in the movie and book. In the movie Ponyboy’s description is tall, darkhair, brown eyes, and light color skin. But in the book Ponyboy’s description is small, good build, greenish grey eyes, and light brown hair. Another character is Johnny, but in the movie Johnny’s description is long hair, dark brown eyes, and dark skin.
One of the differences is that they were fighting a monster in the book but in the movie they were fighting a man, that acted like an animal. In the book the monster was a dragon that they had to fight. In the movie the monster was like a man, but wore animal skin clothes and had paint all over there face. They both were fought in the same way in both the
Many people, if asked what they would prefer, would prefer to read the book instead of watching the movie. It could be because the movie will always leave some parts from the story out. It seems like directors of the movie always leave out parts from the book, only incorporating the important parts from the story. Some also say that they prefer to leave the descriptions of things in the book up to their imagination. Also, when you are reading the book, you get to read the main characters point of view on things.
Also Brain mother in the book got caught at the Mall kissing. In the movie he caught his mom kissing under a tree. In the movie he flew the plane straight into the water and in the book he had made a decision to fly in the water or keep flying. Also in the movie he got attacked by a Bear but in the book he got attacked by a moose. That’s why I said the book and the movie is different.
When seeing the similarities differences between the book and the movie, it is always good to have a set of aspects to see in the book. Also, the to kill a mockingbird book and movie carry out most aspects that are needed in a book or movie. Lastly, it is good to either see or read the book because it gives a sense of all the southern mishaps and good aspects during the
“People are more than just the way they look. ”-A Wrinkle in Time, this is just like a book there’s much more to it than what you see on the cover. In both the movie and the story they are about Meg with her little brother Charles Wallace, and her friend Calvin O’ Keefe go on an adventure through space to save Mr.Murry from IT and the evil IT is spreading throughout space. Also, they Tesser through space with three ladies, Mrs.Who, Mrs.Whatsit, and Mrs.Which. I believe the book was more powerful than the movie because, books let you make up your own visual in your mind wall in the movie, it gives you an image so you can’t use your own imagination, they tell what the characters thoughts and feelings are and, the movie changes major parts of the book that were important.
The first way the movie differs from the book is the portrayals of Jonas. Jonas in the book gets his job and goes out when he is only 12. But in the movie, he doesn 't get his job until he is 18. Also, the way he is marked is different in the book he has pale eyes and in the movie he has a birthmark on the wrist. Lastly, he is a lot more rebellious in the movie he steals a
One of the main reasons they're different is the characters image and how we pictured them. In the book it says Meg is short, has braces, and has glasses. While in the movie she doesn't have glasses, and braces. As for our little character in the book, Charles he's not in school, his
The book is a more powerful representation of the story than the film. This is because the book focuses more on the small details. Also, the book has more scenes which allow the characters to develop more and allows us to understand the personality of our characters. Another reason why the book is more powerful than the movie is that we know what Meg is thinking in the book and don’t have to guess about her thoughts.
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
Books and movies are often very different, although the movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone and the book for the most part are analogous. I liked the book better though, because there is the chance to use your imagination. One major change is the letters that Harry receives from Hogwarts. In the book the first letter is in the mailbox.
The movie however didn’t tell or show what the darkness looks like and what it does. The second reason is that the book had more characters and chapters regarding Meg and the group she
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
The diary of a wimpy kid Do you think the book and the movie of diary of a wimpy kid are the same? 8 years when the book came out it had a lot of success in all the world but mostly in U.S.A and México. In the movie it represents almost every aspect that Jeff Kinney explains in the book because the only thing that is a little bit different is the ending and that in the movie the characters Rowley and Roderick are a little bit different, this is shown using characters, plot, and setting. There are different reasons why I think the book is better, one of them is the characters, for example Rowley the main character´s best friend named Greg is more sensitive because in the movie he cries a lot and he gets mad with Greg, in the book he doesn’t,
