ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Ancient Greece And Us Government

956 Words4 Pages

Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome were two of the most powerful nations in the history of the world. Each of them, at some point, had control of nearly the entire known world at that time. One reason for their successes was their strong governments. The United States government is based mostly on the governments of these two nations and without them, our country would be very different place today.
Ancient Greece’s form of government changed many times over the course of their success. Some of these forms of government worked better than others, but all of them worked well enough to keep their command over most of eastern Europe. Ancient Greece was separated into city-states that traded with each other and worked together for the success of Greece, but otherwise, they were completely independent. As Lauren Luckenbaugh, from Boston University explained, “Each of these city-states …show more content…

As N. S. Gill explains, a republic is a mix of a democracy, an oligarchy, and a monarchy. The power was divided into two groups: an executive branch and a legislative branch. The executive branch consisted of two consuls, who had equal power and worked together to run the everyday government. These consuls were voted for by the popular assemblies and had one year terms. The legislative branch was made up of two parts: the Senate, and the Assembly of Centuries. The Senate had more power than the Assembly of Centuries, and consisted of 300 patrician men. The Assembly of Centuries was mainly responsible for electing the consuls.
The Roman Republic had an extremely good system, but in the early stages of the republic, the power was given almost completely to the patricians, or the rich, landowning families in Rome. The plebeians, or the middle and lower class citizens, had almost no voice in the government. However, this unfairness would not last long and laws were created to distribute the power more

Show More
Related
515 Words | 3 Pages

Despite its name, the Roman Republic was actually quite a mix of both a republic and a democracy. This is said because they used a bottom-up system, allowing even the people with little roles to vote, such as The Assembly. They would vote for their leaders and laws, among other things, as well. One of the main factors in having a republic government is to not have the people involved in selecting leaders, but the Roman Republic did just that. A person cannot say that a republic is a republic if they allow the people to vote because having the people vote is a major part of democracy.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was divided into three branches called the Magistrates, Senate, and the Assemblies and Tribunes, each with their own separate powers. The Magistrates could serve as judges, they could organize games and festivals, and they also originally had some reign over financing the government. The Senate advised leaders and Magistrates, and they eventually took control of finances. The Assemblies and Tribunes could elect Magistrates, protect the Plebeians, ratify or disapprove laws, veto other government officials, and they could declare war. The American Democracy also divides our government into three branches named the Executive Branch (including the President, the Vice-President, and the Cabinet), the Legislative Branch (including the Senate and the House of Representatives), and the Judicial Branch (including the Supreme Court).

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

For example, every adult male had a vote, unless they were disqualified. As stated in our World History textbook, Rome was divided into two group; Patricians, who were the wealthy landowners and the Plebeians who were small farmers and merchants. Each group had a role in government. The Roman Republic's government had three branches, almost like the United States has today.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

There are numerous civilizations that came across the different lands in the world and each played a distinctive role and had its own rules and laws. Geography played a critical role in shaping civilizations, and this is particularly true of ancient Greek. The two rivals of ancient Greece were close together on a map but far apart in what they valued and how they lived their lives. Sparta and Athens had similar forms of government; both city states were in part governed by elected assemblies. However, the top rulers of Athens were elected, while Sparta 's were not.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

The Romans had a system of indirect democracy where the people had the power to vote for representatives who would advocate for them on the state level. The Greeks had a government in which the people directly were involved in the governmental and legislative process. In addition, both systems were flawed in their representation of their people in their respective governments through neglecting a large portion of their population. Both societies did well to create term lengths to decrease the likelihood of corruption and abuse of power through creating accountability. However, the Greek democracy was a caliber above its counterpart.

Read More
394 Words | 2 Pages

The geography of Greece influenced the development of ancient Greek government and politics. When describing ancient Greece, “mountainous land” is the phrase one would use because Greece is made up of many mountains. Because of the mountains, it was difficult to commute from place to place. As a result of that, instead of Greece being ruled by one government, it formed many different poleis, which each had their own government Polis is the Greek word for independent city-states. Greeks had a strong connection with their polis, and they strongly identified with them.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

The Greek system of government was in many ways like that of Rome. Both were democratic. The ability of citizens to make decisions for the country

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

In Ancient Greece, there was diversity not only of the people, but of government structures and styles. The following paragraphs will follow some of that diversity, specifically between the city states of Athens and Sparta regarding their governmental structure. First, some people in Athens and Sparta obtained the right to participate in public life and made decision that would affect their community. Some held public office, and some did not.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

Today, many of the world’s government structures were based on the principle of one of Greece’s city-states. Greece became a country advancing well before its time, strong in both military and brain power. This country was able to produce two city-states that became foundations to advancing the rest of the world. The first city-state, Athens, is thought to be the first to implement a democratic government while Sparta became known for their military power. While Athens and Sparta provide the world with advancements they differ in the ways of government structures, social motivations, and cultural differences.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote.

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

Secondary socialization is a process that teaches people how to participate in society. Agents of socialization refer to the people, groups, and institutions that are the foundations of society. They are often highly influential in shaping our identity and view of the world. The two agencies of socialization that I have chosen to reflect on are media and religion. I will discuss how both topics have affected and influenced my beliefs, values, and role in society.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

In the expected way, government in the ancient Greek world used diverse forms and, across dissimilar city-states and over many centuries, political power could rest in the hands of a single individual: for example, monarchies, tyrants, the oligarchies and

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

Newsletter Article Outlines You were assigned a topic for a Dept. of Communication newsletter article. The first step in writing this article is to outline it. This is due at the beginning of class on October 10 on Blackboard.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy were all forms of government found at different times and in different city-states in Ancient Greece. Elements of more than one of these forms also co-existed, however, and the modern connotations of labels such as these are not necessarily the same as those that prevailed in Ancient Greece. In this paper I firstly describe these various forms of government and provide examples of their use in Ancient Greece. I then compare and contrast the models.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

The General Assembly and Senate established a sense of importance in Rome. The General Assembly was made up of Plebeians, and the Senate consists of Patricians. The terms General Assembly and Senate are two of many terms still used in the US Government today. The Romans were led by a king who was approved by the senate and a vote of the people, which is also displayed in the US Government. This is displayed in our presidential elections.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Ancient Greece And Us Government

Related Topics

Open Document