Darwin vs. Dawkins
(An Essay comparing the ideals of Darwin and Dawkins)
Evolution, and physical boundaries can keep people apart, but honestly what about travel? There are things that can hinder and help create genetic diversity, all those things Dawkins and Darwin have gone over and over again to analyses and apply to the real world. They elaborate on the intense reasoning behind all evolution.
In Darwin’s Natural selection essay he explains that the huge genetic diversity is contrived of many factors. Things like where on the planet the species is and how well adapted it is. Things like the environment can harm beings. Change in temperature and physical environment can harm beings. If a climate changes a plant to make it thicker, animals and insects can be harmed by this change if they interact with that plant on an average daily basis. James Wynn writes that “all animals can be affected by climate change, and this huge format of natural
…show more content…
Both from Adam and Eve and millions and millions of human beings reproducing and moving around creating a genetic diversity all its own while connecting pieces of the planet together. “Dawkins explains that DNA will clump and move around during reproduction and that all DNA is comprised of all the generations before. That is much more advanced than the thinking of Darwin, but it is an added though to the thoughts of Darwin.” Jonathan Romaine. All is true, the theory of Dawkins wouldn’t exist without Darwin. Not much about the genetics of animals would exist without Darwin. Michael Ruse explains “that most of the reason that people are not all related is due to people having gate need to move around and meet people from all over the world. But in the same since, most people stay in one region, one country, and reproduce, creating a population abundant with relatives.” This is the same advanced though of